Hell some were even complaining about IT and the runtime, which due to the length of the book is justified. If it involves someone we like we'll sit three plus hours through any movie, concert or sports game.
How many times did you sit through Avengers: Endgame?
Here and beyond, it's amazing that people are actually griping about a movie over three hours when just a few months ago they were all-in for sitting in a movie theater multiple times for Endgame. But just a little bit longer for a movie by Martin Scorsese of all people is where they draw the line. Personally, though, a mobster movie by Scorsese that tops three hours sounds like an absolute treat. I'm in.
First of all, relax. I have no problem with long films or sitting in a theater for long films. My favorite film of all time is The Godfather: Part II. I'm a champion of filmmaking and believe that filmmakers should take the time to tell the stories they need to tell.
I also didn't mean to sound like I'm complaining about this, but The Irishman being 3.5 hours long essentially makes it Scorsese's longest film ever. Based on the story he seems to be telling and what we saw in the trailer, that seems kind of unnecessary to me. Longer than Wolf of Wall Street, Casino, The Aviator, Gangs of New York, The Last Temptation of Christ, and a full hour longer than Goodfellas.
I will still be watching this and I'm excited for it, but even incredible filmmakers like Scorsese can make films that drag and don't warrant such lengthy runtimes. Just because I commented on it doesn't mean I'm "drawing the line".
We won't know if the runtime was unnecesary until we see the film, no?
Anything over 3 hours seems excessive to me. If the story demanded a longer runtime, then they should have made it a two-part movie.3.5 hour runtime sounds ridiculous and unnecessary.
First of all, relax. I have no problem with long films or sitting in a theater for long films. My favorite film of all time is The Godfather: Part II. I'm a champion of filmmaking and believe that filmmakers should take the time to tell the stories they need to tell.
I also didn't mean to sound like I'm complaining about this, but The Irishman being 3.5 hours long essentially makes it Scorsese's longest film ever. Based on the story he seems to be telling and what we saw in the trailer, that seems kind of unnecessary to me. Longer than Wolf of Wall Street, Casino, The Aviator, Gangs of New York, The Last Temptation of Christ, and a full hour longer than Goodfellas.
I will still be watching this and I'm excited for it, but even incredible filmmakers like Scorsese can make films that drag and don't warrant such lengthy runtimes. Just because I commented on it doesn't mean I'm "drawing the line".
I'm sorry, no. This is franchise movie thinking.Anything over 3 hours seems excessive to me. If the story demanded a longer runtime, then they should have made it a two-part movie.
Jurassic Park Syndrome?