Project862006
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 21,197
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
never heard of him is dont care about this character sorry lol
is he even interesting ?
is he even interesting ?
If they aren't going to set it in WWII, then they shouldn't make it at all. It's that simple.
And now this is stuck in my head to the tune of the Iron Man theme.He's Sgt. Rock.
He chats with Spock.
The future's safe with Sgt. Rock!t:
Guy Ritchie back on Sgt RockTodd Brown @ Twitch Film said:What's next for Guy Ritchie after Sherlock Holmes: A Game Of Shadows? There has been talk of Excalibur but Twitch has learned that Warner Brothers is putting the Warren Ellis scripted project aside and instead wants Ritchie to focus on a title from his past: The DC Comics adaptation Sgt Rock.
Ritchie was initially linked to the Sgt Rock adaptation a few years back but eventually gave way to Francis Lawrence, who wanted to take the film away from the comics WWII setting and give it a futuristic spin, instead. But Twitch has learned that Warner Brothers and producer Joel Silver have now put Sgt Rock back in Ritchie's court and are lining it up as his next film.
Though the change has not yet been announced Ritchie is already supervising the current draft of the screenplay, one that retains the original setting and pits the title character against German troops in WWII.
Back when Arnold Schwarzenegger was a mega-star he was attached to play Rock which put it firmly in Joel Silver's plans, and I guess it stayed there even when Arnie moved on. Now maybe with INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS being a huge financial success and CAPTAIN AMERICA being a World War II comic-to-movie adaptation they think a SGT. ROCK film could do good business.Why is this such a priority at WB again?
What makes you say that?what a delightfully uninteresting sounding character...
Back when Arnold Schwarzenegger was a mega-star he was attached to play Rock which put it firmly in Joel Silver's plans, and I guess it stayed there even when Arnie moved on. Now maybe with INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS being a huge financial success and CAPTAIN AMERICA being a World War II comic-to-movie adaptation they think a SGT. ROCK film could do good business.
What makes you say that?
Of course. The addition in the script by Peoples that had Rock's father being an immigrant from Germany was handled very well though, and would work just fine in a non-ROCK WWII project. The rumour a while back was that Bruce Willis was under consideration, I think he'd be a fine choice.Even if Schwarzenegger would've gotten the roll & set in WW2, it still would've been a bad idea, with Arnold's accent etc. Now that the project has been resurrected, it needs to be done right & set in WW2 & not in the future. Lastly, they should get an actor that can act & not ham it up.
Of course. The addition in the script by Peoples that had Rock's father being an immigrant from Germany was handled very well though, and would work just fine in a non-ROCK WWII project. The rumour a while back was that Bruce Willis was under consideration, I think he'd be a fine choice.
I know I may catch a lot of flack for this casting suggestion but I believe Mel Gibson could be good for this role. He's played a soldier before & it be perfect, I do know he's indifferent to comic movie roles but perhaps with the right encouragement they could entice him.
I wonder if Robert Downey Jr would be interested since Guy Ritchie is doing it and Sgt. Rock was the comic he grew up reading.
RDJ is undoubtedly a brilliant actor, but he's not right for Rock. He said as much himself.I wonder if Robert Downey Jr would be interested since Guy Ritchie is doing it and Sgt. Rock was the comic he grew up reading.
Gibson could be a good choice.I know I may catch a lot of flack for this casting suggestion but I believe Mel Gibson could be good for this role. He's played a soldier before & it be perfect, I do know he's indifferent to comic movie roles but perhaps with the right encouragement they could entice him.
Same as with RDJ, Depp is a brilliant actor but not in the Rock mould. Depp said he loved Namor too, and he'd be a-maz-ing for that.That'd be neat. I also remember Johnny Depp saying he was a Sgt. Rock fan growing up. I think either could be cool.
Jack Giroux said:Francis Lawrence keeps himself busy, and it shows when you look at his untrusty IMDB page. The directors name has been tied to a lot of projects in the past few years Survivor, Sgt. Rock, Houdini, and more but many of those films arent ones Lawrence will be making. In my interview with the director, we spent some time discussing what may be next for him, either Houdini or Unbroken, and why certain projects didnt come together.
First off, Lawrence wont be adapting Survivor, which he backed away from over two years ago. Not because the project died while he was working on it, but over a tonal issue:
Well, Survivor I love, love, love the book. It was a friend of mine who wrote the first draft, and he did a really good job. I was trying to find the real human story in that story. Chuck Palahniuk has a very specific tone which I love but sometimes its hard to find a real human story in there, and thats what I was trying to find. I couldnt balance injecting the human into it, without losing too much of that tone; the reason to do it is, really, the tone. I couldnt find right balance, so I eventually gave up. I wanted to give the guys who had the rights, who were desperate to go make it, the chance to go make it. I got off of it maybe two or three years ago, and they still havent done anything with it. Im not sure where it sits now.
The long in development comic book adaptation Sgt. Rock also wont bare the directors name. Producer Akiva Goldsman and Lawrence wanted to make a near-future war film, while Warner Bros. was interested in sticking to World War II:
Sgt. Rock was something both Akiva [Goldsman] and I were involved in at Warner Bros. We werent trying to do the World War II version of it, but something in the near-future. It was really cool, and I really liked it, but Warner Bros. wanted to go back to the World War II version of it.
The recently-discussed Houdini project may be next, as long as Sony gives the greenlight.
As of right now, Lawrence is unofficially prepping the film. Were not in the official prep yet, and were kind of in the research phase. Most of the movie takes place just before the turn of the century, so its sort of figuring out how to do the turn of the century New York, and what thats like, what the people were like, what the landscape of Manhattan looked like at the time, and cataloging all the cool kind of places we could set scenes at; all of this is while the script is being written. Houdini also wont be a bio film as Lawrence pointed out, Its not a bio pic, its actually historical-fiction. Were doing a thing where were taking real characters from the era and putting them together in the film and creating our own story.
If Houdini doesnt come together, then an adaptation of Unbroken may be his next project. But if Houdini does in fact come together, Unbroken still might be his follow-up:
Im focusing on the project Im on right now, but its between Houdini and Unbroken. I got involved in this book, this Laura Hillenbrand book, about Louie Zamperini and World War II. Im also really involved in that as well. If Houdini falls apart, or something like that, thats a definite possibility. If Houdini happens, then I think Unbroken would be next.
As for the possible Constantine sequel: I somehow forgot to plead with Lawrence to make it happen, but Im sure that its still in the same place its been for the past few years. Hopefully that, along with Houdini, will come together for the very good filmmaker.