Makeup can take away a lot of years. I don't think they would go the route of CGI to de-age Cox...that would cost a lot of money and take away from the action scenes. I say bring him back. Cox is a great actor.Drago said:How do you adjust for Cox's age if he has a big role in this one though? In X2 he pointed out to Logan that he has aged and Logan hasn't. Wouldn't that cost a lot "de-aging" him for a most of the film?
ISHMAEL said:maye be he should comeback
did u guys know this ?
Quote Also, previously, Arad had indicated the Wolverine spin-off film would be a X-Men 3 sequel, but in this interview he back-peddled. "I don't want to call it a prequel nor a sequel. It is Wolverine's story and it is really concentrating on him. It's about his life, his mysteries, and his loves. It's not really a prequel or a sequel. It's just a story like in the comics where we have X-Men, Wolverine, and books dealing with the other X-Men. Obviously, Wolverine is the number one X-man, and deserves his own story. Hugh Jackman will make the story that much more compelling."
Well of course Stryker wouldn't work for a sequel...he's deadWarhammer said:It better be a prequel, because if it's a sequel, it is unneeded.
X4 would be a better, as a Wolverine sequel to X3 would be a waste of time. We got enough of him in the X-films.
