BrianWilly
Disciple of Whedon
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2003
- Messages
- 13,275
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
Something that I was thinking about after I read Gillen's Ares mini, and that I was reminded of today reading this issue...
Ares has pointed out that there are two Olympian gods of war. Athena is the one who governs everything that is strategic about war, and Ares is the one who governs everything that...isn't. For those of you who haven't read the miniseries (YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG), Ares would then spend the rest of the story grooming and teaching a small group of specialist soldiers for his own special squad. He acts the gruff general, but it's driven in that he genuinely cares for them and treats them as comrades, even going as far as to place himself in danger or not fighting at his full strength, in order to protect them. He encourages them to look out for one another and to brook no insults to their honor.
And it just got me thinking; being passionate, having camaraderie, forming the bonds between brothers and sisters that can only be forged in war...is not strategic. Emotional bonds and oaths between soldiers is not strategic, and we see Athena constantly discouraging that kind of thinking over in iHerc; she espouses total control of the battlefield, complete predictability and being able to see three steps ahead of everyone, which requires a commander to be detached and critical of all things, including friendship. Emotional ties confuse the chain of command and distract from doing what needs to be done to dominate the field. We see Athena bringing this up over and over again. If wartime friendship and comradeship can help win a fight then so be it, but on their own merits they mean nothing to Athena.
Which means that those kinds of things fall under Ares' province. He's the god of warbonds. He's the god of trusting your fellow soldiers to fight with you to the end. He's the god of leaving no man behind.
When you read Siege with that in mind, it just becomes that much more interesting.
So RIPieces, Ares you magnificent bastard. See you in a few.
Ares has pointed out that there are two Olympian gods of war. Athena is the one who governs everything that is strategic about war, and Ares is the one who governs everything that...isn't. For those of you who haven't read the miniseries (YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG), Ares would then spend the rest of the story grooming and teaching a small group of specialist soldiers for his own special squad. He acts the gruff general, but it's driven in that he genuinely cares for them and treats them as comrades, even going as far as to place himself in danger or not fighting at his full strength, in order to protect them. He encourages them to look out for one another and to brook no insults to their honor.
And it just got me thinking; being passionate, having camaraderie, forming the bonds between brothers and sisters that can only be forged in war...is not strategic. Emotional bonds and oaths between soldiers is not strategic, and we see Athena constantly discouraging that kind of thinking over in iHerc; she espouses total control of the battlefield, complete predictability and being able to see three steps ahead of everyone, which requires a commander to be detached and critical of all things, including friendship. Emotional ties confuse the chain of command and distract from doing what needs to be done to dominate the field. We see Athena bringing this up over and over again. If wartime friendship and comradeship can help win a fight then so be it, but on their own merits they mean nothing to Athena.
Which means that those kinds of things fall under Ares' province. He's the god of warbonds. He's the god of trusting your fellow soldiers to fight with you to the end. He's the god of leaving no man behind.
When you read Siege with that in mind, it just becomes that much more interesting.
So RIPieces, Ares you magnificent bastard. See you in a few.
t:

I would love you long time.


