Siege

I still don't get why he's suddenly so popular. People hated how he was portrayed in the Wolverine movie.

No, comic nerds hated how he was portrayed in the movie. He was universally acknowledged in the movie as an awesome character, except for the fan boys who actually know the history - which shouldn't be a reason to be upset anyway, as this is a completely different universe than 616 or ultimate.

For how little he was actually in it he got a ****load of press about it, he got his sequel that's set just around Deadpool, etc etc etc.

Seriously, the only people I've seen ***** about his role or say it was a **** role were / are comic fans. Everyone else thought it was awesome.

Also, since he's such an easy character to write in his current personality (lol so randum XD) it's incredibly easy to assassign someone to write some 20 page deadpool story and have it turned into a comic. Guess when they launched Deadpool #1 during Secret Invasion they realized it was a good way to print money, and they haven't looked back since.
 
Personally i thought Barakpool was an interesting mock to Deadpool (shutting his mouth) but what ticked me off was that he only used like... 4 super powers when he had like... was it 11 or 13? Still they could have made a cool fight but that didn't happen. :(

Not to mention the Quicksilver cameo.... Don't get me started.
 
"Barakapool" was ok as a created character to fit into the movie's plot. But why make Wade Wilson into him?

And anyone who STILL thinks Deadpool is a shallow, wise cracking ninja or a Deathstroke rip off either needs to actually read some Deadpool books or not comment on him at all, really.
 
I liked the way they explained DP's powers in the movie. Having him get his teleportation by taking it from another mutant is a much better movie explanation than him having teleport tech. However, now they're going to have to come up with some cheap excuse as to why he doesn't have Cyclop's optic blasts in the deadpool movie.
 
His movie has no ties to Wolverine. It's gonna be a "reboot" of the character. I'm sure they'll be some cheeky references to it though.
 
lol yea so far so good. I'll wait until i get proper hyped up though :D

Anyway... has Siege 3 come out yet? Any new major developments in Siege? Since my laptop died i've been lost to the world of comics.
 
Siege #3 comes out early in March. [blackout]Ares died and Cap gathered a bunch of other heroes to join the fray[/blackout] in Siege #2. Those are the main things.
 
And judging by DA, I say Sentry changes sides or they find a way to separate the Void/Sentry, which would actually be a good way to depower him and make him a actually good character.
 
They were already separated back in Jenkins' second mini. That didn't really do much for depowering the Sentry, and he sure as hell didn't become a good character afterward.
 
I think he only separated in the original mini? In the second mini, it was just stating how they're NOT mirror images of each other (as Void killed more than Sentry saved).
 
Bah! I still say separate them and do it for good this time. Then make a Sentry/Moon Knight on going. That would make a crazy comic. Or even let DP join them with Slapstick and name it the Crazies....................yeah I know I went to far but still.............
 
I think he only separated in the original mini? In the second mini, it was just stating how they're NOT mirror images of each other (as Void killed more than Sentry saved).
But he tossed the Void into the sun and was all, "That'll keep him out of my hair for a while!"
 
Oh man, totally calling Chinese food ****s The Voids.
 
I've never had a problem with chinese food to be fair.

Now Indian or Thai...? That's a whole different box of noodles...
 
Gage on "Siege: Captain America"

ac4x2h.jpg



CBR News: Christos, this isn't the first time you've written a Steve Rogers adventure that ties into a big event. You also tackled the character during "Civil War" with the one-shot "Iron Man/Captain America: Casualties of War." Is it a coincidence that you're doing another event tie-in starring Steve, or is it just that there is something you find especially compelling about writing the character in these big events?

Christos Gage: I always find it compelling to write Steve - to me he's Marvel's greatest hero, the embodiment of what heroism means in the Marvel Universe. I don't know if my prior experience writing Steve in the "Civil War" Captain America/Iron Man special influenced editor Bill Rosemann to approach me about writing this one, but this is actually more Bucky Cap's story than Steve's, so it's a bit of a change of pace from the last one.

Bill Rosemann: One of Christos' great strengths as a writer - in addition to his experience writing these characters and nailing their individual voices - is his ability to maneuver within an extremely tight storytelling space. By that I mean, if you say to Christos, "Okay, I need a story that accomplishes This Emotional Beat for this character, and I need it to take place between Panels X and Y of issue #Z," not only can he figure out how to pull that off, but he will do so in style with a story that not only gets your pulse racing, but hits you right in the gut. It's a rare talent, and one that should never be taken for granted or overlooked.

This story also features Bucky in his Captain America guise. Christos, is this the first time you've written Bucky Cap?

CG: It's actually not my first time writing Bucky Cap, but only by a nose - the two Caps are in "Avengers: The Initiative" #34 (fighting Taskmaster!), which I wrote a couple weeks earlier. What's interesting to me about Bucky Cap is that he approaches being Captain America in a different way than Steve Rogers. He's been shaped by his experiences as the Winter Soldier, and also by the fact that by nature he's more of a pragmatist than the more idealistic Steve.

That's what's compelling to me; both men share the same dream, the same ideals, but they take a different approach to getting there, and I find that intriguing to explore. There's also that element of confidence Steve has - not arrogance at all, but self-assurance and comfort in his role. He's at a point where he doesn't really second-guess himself much, he does what has to be done, and that's it. Bucky - especially when he's wearing the Captain America uniform - has more questions and uncertainties, based on his troubled past as the Winter Soldier. That's something I'll be examining as well.

It sounds like this one-shot is very much about the dynamic between Steve and Bucky as dual Captain Americas. Is that correct? And how would you describe that dynamic at the beginning of this issue?

CG: What we're really delving into here are Bucky's feelings about remaining Captain America now that Steve's back. Of course, Ed Brubaker showed us beautifully how Steve feels about it, and why he arrived at the decision he did, in "Captain America: Who Will Wield the Shield." What I'm doing is looking at how Bucky feels about it. As far as Steve's concerned, it's been decided: Bucky stays as Captain America. But now that they're in the thick of battle, fighting side by side, does Bucky feel the same? Does he believe he should keep the mantle? It's something he only picked up because, with Steve presumed dead, he didn't think anyone else should have it - but now that Steve's returned, does he feel he's up to it? Does he even want it? Is he at all resentful at being asked to carry on, or is it an honor? These are some of the questions we'll be examining.

What else you can share with us about the plot or themes of this one-shot? From whose perspective is this story told?

CG: Primarily Bucky's, although we'll also get some insight into Steve's mind and also see "Siege" through the eyes of ordinary citizens of Broxton, Oklahoma.

Speaking of Brockton, what can you tell us about the settings of "Siege: Captain America?" Does this story take place entirely in present day during the course of the battle, or are there flashbacks involved?

CG: The story takes place over a very short time, at a specific moment toward the end of "Siege" #3. I can't say more without giving too much away, but it's one of those stories that occurs during the chaos and fog of war - a kind of story Captain America is well suited to.

What obstacles and adversaries were you interested at throwing at Steve and Bucky in this story?

CG: They'll be facing off against enemies from "Siege," but again, I'm limited as to what I can say by not wanting to put forth spoilers. Having said that, I did want to complicate matters for our heroes by having civilians put in harm's way and seeing how they react. So, we'll be meeting a civilian family - citizens of Broxton, Oklahoma - who are caught in the midst of the Siege of Asgard. I wanted to examine how ordinary, non-powered people feel about what's going on and how it affects them - and how the heroes respond.

The artist on the story, Federico Dallocchio, is a relative newcomer. How did you discover him and what was it about his style that makes him the right fit for the one-shot?

CG: I'd seen his work before on a WildStorm book, "StarCraft," but as good as that was, when his first pencils for this one-shot came in I was tremendously impressed. The art's both finely detailed and viscerally hard hitting at the same time, which is the perfect feel for this story. So far he's been great to work with.

BR: Federico's style is a beautiful mix of gritty realism and hyper-realized heroism. Ever since I saw his work in "StarCraft" and "Gears of War," I was itching to unleash him on Marvel characters. One of the most enjoyable aspects of being an editor is "casting" your project - finding and uniting the right voices and styles for a particular story - and if you can combine that with giving an opportunity for a deserving talent to be seen by a large amount of readers - well, that's what this job is all about. So if you're unfamiliar with his art, once you read this issue you'll see that Federico is a perfect fit for Marvel and a welcome addition to the next generation of rising stars.

Ultimately, it sounds as though the tone of "Siege: Captain America" is both epic and personal to the characters involved.

CG: It's about personal moments occurring against the backdrop of an epic setting during epic circumstances. There's big, important stuff happening all around, but there are equally important - if less overtly earth-shattering - developments as well, and that's our focus.
 
"Barakapool" was ok as a created character to fit into the movie's plot. But why make Wade Wilson into him?

And anyone who STILL thinks Deadpool is a shallow, wise cracking ninja or a Deathstroke rip off either needs to actually read some Deadpool books or not comment on him at all, really.

Deathstroke rip off? no. Shallow? When written by Way-Yes. Cable and Deadpool spent 50 issues redeeming Deadpool in a convincing and believable manner. He went from remorseless killer to almost being an honest-to-God hero. Way, much like Bendis, chose to completely ignore this character development and return him to a murderous merc-for-hire.

And before anyone says that I don't know what I'm talking about, I own every issue of Cable and Deadpool and the current Deadpool series. Just sayin'.


And X-men Origins: Wolverine was the worst movie of 2009 and I know ONE person who actually thought it was good. Baraka-pool was pure crap. Fanboy or not, I know bad when I see it. :o
 
Deathstroke rip off? no. Shallow? When written by Way-Yes. Cable and Deadpool spent 50 issues redeeming Deadpool in a convincing and believable manner. He went from remorseless killer to almost being an honest-to-God hero. Way, much like Bendis, chose to completely ignore this character development and return him to a murderous merc-for-hire.

And before anyone says that I don't know what I'm talking about, I own every issue of Cable and Deadpool and the current Deadpool series. Just sayin'.


And X-men Origins: Wolverine was the worst movie of 2009 and I know ONE person who actually thought it was good. Baraka-pool was pure crap. Fanboy or not, I know bad when I see it. :o

Now you know 2 and I know numerous people who loved it. Again, you can't judge by a comic website by how many people in the GA hated it because comic fans judge it differently. Although I don't agree with how DP was treated, I don't think the movie is as bad as people say.
 
When people say Wolverine was the worst of 09 I first laugh, then roll my eyes.

Seriously... worse than GI Joe, Dragonballs, Hannah Montana and literally dozens of other dog **** movies? C'mon...

It was disappointing because of the talent it had in front and behind the camera didn't make a brilliant movie, they made a ok movie.
 
I thought it was worst than GI Joe....I at least found GI Joe mildly entertaining
 
I didn't think it was that bad either. I liked the Paris chase scene. But the acting by pretty much everyone was crap. At least in Wolverine there was some good acting. And it had someone slicing bullets in half with katanas :D
 
The only reason to like GI Joe over Wolvie? Sienna Miller. That's really the only thing that would possibly make GI Joe better than WO, otherwise, no. =l
 
Hey, you know when talking about the Wolverine movie was fun? Nine f***ing months ago. :cmad:

Gage's Cap one-shot sounds good. I kind of wish it were more about Steve, though, given that the Cap ongoing is now about Bucky and Bucky will be Cap for Avengers. It seems like Steve is drifting into the background a bit. Although, I guess Steve will be the "main" Cap for Siege itself. Either way, I'll definitely pick the one-shot up. Gage is usually a sure bet for a good story, and as Rosemann pointed out, he does seem to be one of the better tie-in writers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"