Simon Gets The Pressure!!!!

Ted is indeed right.

Dosent changed the fact that kinberg and penn lied about other details however
 
The Batman said:
Dosent changed the fact that kinberg and penn lied about other details however

Dont bother man. It seems the mods there refuse to believe that these Two lied & are acting like they never said the things I listed that they said
 
tedw said:
Everyone assumes "Phoenix effect" = fire or firebirds. And I'm not arguing about whether there should've been fire or not. But the atomization, rising water, etc. still constitutes a special effect, no?

That's why I'm saying that that example is subjective. Someone's interpretation of "Phoenix effect" as fire might make it seem like a lie, but the words don't automatically mean there was going to be a firebird and they lied about it.
I understand what you're saying, and this is what I put forward everytime it's claimed that the writers confirmed the firebird. None the less, they knew they were being misleading. They knew people would assume the firebird. Not once did they come out and state there would be no firebird, which wouldn't have ventured into a spoiler given it's only an effect. They made an effort to squirm around the firebird questions because they knew full well there would be some fan outrage.

I'm sounding like a bit of an X3 hater, and I'm not at all. Love it. Kinberg and Penn did mislead however, even if they didn't lie. They knew how fans would interpret things they said.
 
GothicPowerMix1 said:
Dont bother man. It seems the mods there refuse to believe that these Two lied & are acting like they never said the things I listed that they said


Can you blame them? The main reason so many people went to their forums was because of the Q and A. Otherwise, the board was pretty dead.
 
^ No, and I don't have an answer or apology for something like "Rogue will kick ass". Not that I feel the need to apologize anyway, other than to defend trashing of our forum by one person with an agenda.

My point was only that we each individually read responses and interpret what's being said - so when you read "Phoenix effect" and assume fire, that's subjective. When the filmmakers go with the water and atomization and someone involved says the "Phoenix effect" is going to be cool, you can't make a claim that it was a lie unless a firebird was promised to you.

If you think it's misleading, ok. I won't argue against that. At the same time, it's probably naive for us all to expect that either of them would sit down and say, "This movie will be bad. You will hate it because these characters die, we decided to use a different FX for Phoenix, and these other characters get cured."
 
tedw said:
If you think it's misleading, ok

So your telling they NEVER once at all said


Fans of certain Characters will not be disappointed with how each Character Story ends

Only 30 Seconds cut out of the Entire Movie

Cyclops Fans will be happy with Cyclops

Rogue Fans will be happy with Rogue

They also said that the AICN Script review from last year was from an "Idea Draft" & that most of the stuff does not at all happen in the Movie when pretty much EVERYTHING from that Script Review DID happen in the Movie ?

Hopy crap I must have been at the wrong damn site !!!!!!!!!
 
tedw said:
^ No, and I don't have an answer or apology for something like "Rogue will kick ass". Not that I feel the need to apologize anyway, other than to defend trashing of our forum by one person with an agenda.

My point was only that we each individually read responses and interpret what's being said - so when you read "Phoenix effect" and assume fire, that's subjective. When the filmmakers go with the water and atomization and someone involved says the "Phoenix effect" is going to be cool, you can't make a claim that it was a lie unless a firebird was promised to you.

If you think it's misleading, ok. I won't argue against that. At the same time, it's probably naive for us all to expect that either of them would sit down and say, "This movie will be bad. You will hate it because these characters die, we decided to use a different FX for Phoenix, and these other characters get cured."


But, by that same token, did they really have to say cyke fans would be pleased, knowing that they really wouldnt? saying Rogue kicks ass, when she really wouldnt?
 
^

He has a point. Cyclops fans were never going to be pleased with his death, and given the reaction to the AICN script, this was widely known. The Rogue fans were never going to be happy with her taking the cure.

Personally, I loved the Cyclops death scene, but then, I'm not a Cyclops fan. It's obvious the Cyclops fans wouldn't be happy with it. No one could think they would be.
 
The Batman said:
But, by that same token, did they really have to say cyke fans would be pleased, knowing that they really wouldnt? saying Rogue kicks ass, when she really wouldnt?

Like I said dont bother. The mods there are going to obviously stick up for the Writers & obviously think they never said things
 
The Batman said:
Can you blame them? The main reason so many people went to their forums was because of the Q and A. Otherwise, the board was pretty dead.
I'm not sure what's enfuriating people - their idea that the writers lied, or the idea that either Matt or I have an opinion to post on this forum when it comes to discussion of our own forum. :confused:

If you hate this movie, by all means, go tell them. The only thing we asked in the threads was that people at least remain civil in their negativity, rather than launching a volley of swearing and insults.

Gothic, as far as I can see, the writers said they hoped Rogue fans would be happy, and that they did the best they were able to with Cyclops. And I believe it was Brett who said that only a small scene was cut, since both writers admitted they did not have control over the final cut of the film.
 
tedw said:
And I believe it was Brett who said that only a small scene was cut,

& then after that they said the same thing & even also said that they werent sure if it was FOX or Bretts decision to cut the small Scene & as I listed there are other exambles. But hey you can act like they never said anything you can stick up for them if you wnat but I will tell you right now you are fighting a LOOSING BATTLE & if you aks me they never should have done these Q&As. But hey you enjoy sticking up for them. But we all know waht they said & as I said you can continue to live in your dream world & act like what they did was wrong when they said certain things & if you aks me they do AICN an apology for out right calling them liars & saying that Script Review pretty much didnt exist in thsi Movie
 
tedw said:
^ No, and I don't have an answer or apology for something like "Rogue will kick ass". Not that I feel the need to apologize anyway, other than to defend trashing of our forum by one person with an agenda.

My point was only that we each individually read responses and interpret what's being said - so when you read "Phoenix effect" and assume fire, that's subjective. When the filmmakers go with the water and atomization and someone involved says the "Phoenix effect" is going to be cool, you can't make a claim that it was a lie unless a firebird was promised to you.

If you think it's misleading, ok. I won't argue against that. At the same time, it's probably naive for us all to expect that either of them would sit down and say, "This movie will be bad. You will hate it because these characters die, we decided to use a different FX for Phoenix, and these other characters get cured."

phoenix26pu.jpg

phoenix30gj.jpg

phoenix13jp.jpg
 
You're putting words in my mouth. I never said they are not liars, or that they did not say things you have listed. I'm not fighting a battle at all, I'm posting an opinion on a message board.

I disagree with a post I saw made by another forum member who acted as though people's disappointment in Jean's role was influenced directly by lies from the writer. I did not say, "These writers are the most pure and virtuous people in the world!" I have nothing to gain by defending them, since the movie is over and out at this point.
 
tedw said:
You're putting words in my mouth. I never said they are not liars

Ah okay never mind I apologize there mattc was the one that said they werent liars when they are
 
Puleeze. Simon and Zak were very aware of what the fans considered the Phoenix effect. I don't buy that it was some sort of miscommunication.

If you want to give them the benefit of the doubt and say their answers weren't outright lies, you have to admit they were (at the very least) deliberately misleading.

I do believe Simon and Zak's participation was more carefully orchestrated than some people think. Either the Xverse admins knowingly allowed the writers to use their messageboard for damage control or they were merely innocent pawns that were used by Fox.
 
Hugh'sMrs said:
Puleeze. Simon and Zak were very aware of what the fans considered the Phoenix effect. I don't buy that it was some sort of miscommunication.

If you want to give them the benefit of the doubt and say their answers weren't outright lies, you have to admit they were (at the very least) deliberately misleading.

I do believe Simon and Zak's participation was more carefully orchestrated than some people think. Either the Xverse admins knowingly allowed the writers to use their messageboard for damage control or they were merely innocent pawns that were used by Fox.
After asking about interviews, we asked them if they would take part in the message board because we thought it would be interesting for fans to be able to ask questions. Good intentions and all that.
 
Did they lie? Yes, but it was a necessary lie in order to protect the movie from spoilers

they clearly states that the AICN was drastically revised. <~ clear lie

they also said cyclops fans will be happy <~ cant really call it a lie but what would you expect them to say.

so for this, they will feel the heat, cyclops is just part of it a lot of other fans are pissed at them :)
 
what they need to do is come clean to the fans, they already talked about "parameters" ... now tell us about it ... and tell us what originally was the idea or concept behind certain characters
 
tedw said:
Good intentions and all that.

With most of the things they said turning out to be crap how can we really know if they did what they did was for good intentions ? At the time fans were believing the AICN Script Reviw & hating it with a passion. It would not be surprising at all if FOX asked them to do this to mislead the fans purposely. But we will never know & I still stand by that they owe AICN an apology
 
I mean that our asking of them to participate was good intentions on our part. ;)
 
tedw said:
I mean that our asking of them to participate was good intentions on our part. ;)

Ah okay. Any big Movie Site would do that when given the chance. Then they probably asked FOX first if they can do that & then FOX came up with a dirty little plan :o
 
tedw said:
^ No, and I don't have an answer or apology for something like "Rogue will kick ass". Not that I feel the need to apologize anyway, other than to defend trashing of our forum by one person with an agenda.

My point was only that we each individually read responses and interpret what's being said - so when you read "Phoenix effect" and assume fire, that's subjective. When the filmmakers go with the water and atomization and someone involved says the "Phoenix effect" is going to be cool, you can't make a claim that it was a lie unless a firebird was promised to you.

If you think it's misleading, ok. I won't argue against that. At the same time, it's probably naive for us all to expect that either of them would sit down and say, "This movie will be bad. You will hate it because these characters die, we decided to use a different FX for Phoenix, and these other characters get cured."

There seem to be quite a few people who are upset with Simon and Zak so it's not just one person with an agenda against your forum.

I don't think people are necessarily upset with you and Matt because you had no control over S&Z's answers.

I also don't blame you for feeling you owe them a measure of protection. But it's not like they weren't aware there would be backlash. Yet they continued to mislead people even after it became apparent people weren't accepting their responses. They worked pretty hard to convince us that ours fears were unfounded when they had to realize we'd find out sooner than later. They could've (and should've) retreated instead of continuing their PR campaign. I wonder if ultimately they'll feel it wasn't worth the ego-stroking they enjoyed.
 
GothicPowerMix1 said:
With most of the things they said turning out to be crap how can we really know if they did what they did was for good intentions ? At the time fans were believing the AICN Script Reviw & hating it with a passion. It would not be surprising at all if FOX asked them to do this to mislead the fans purposely. But we will never know & I still stand by that they owe AICN an apology

Unfortunately that hatemongering was back in June of 2005 as I recall. FOX said it was an older released draft but as we can see it wasn't as about 90% of everything stayed in the film.

The writers obviously orchestrated the "Q&A" after a so called "review" hit the wire back in January of 2006 along with leaked images. At that point is when the writers decided to take up Ted & Matt on their offer to answer some questions as damage control.

Again, if it wasn't for those images the Xverse would still be deserted and Penn&Kinberg would never have participated in the first place as their Q&A Forums were abandoned, along with the Xverse for months.
 
Hugh'sMrs said:
I don't think people are necessarily upset with you and Matt because you had no control over S&Z's answers.

Exactly none of us are upset with Ted & Matt. They did what any other Movie Site would do they had an opportunity & they took it like anyone else running a Movie Site would do & that is totally understandable on their part. No one is blaming them at all for what they said
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,467
Messages
22,113,553
Members
45,906
Latest member
uglygoblin
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"