Ebil Gig
Superhero
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2005
- Messages
- 9,830
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
farmerfran said:Oh my Ebil, not you![]()
Yes, me.
I know nothing is really in his eye but I do see Venom's face in it. Does that make sense? 
farmerfran said:Oh my Ebil, not you![]()
I know nothing is really in his eye but I do see Venom's face in it. Does that make sense? 
Ebil Gig said:Yes, me.I know nothing is really in his eye but I do see Venom's face in it. Does that make sense?
![]()

BillLoomis said:http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/spiderman3/blog/ and they added some new words to the tagline.
Jubba said:ok for the record....i didn't see anything in here at first...then something of an outline was pointed out to me and really that's all i see now when i look at it
i do think it's coincidence since doc ock was so clearly visible in the sm2 poster
but anyway here's what i see...step by step....i added the colour and the extra lines to show what i'm thinking...haha go nuts
![]()
because i have not noticed this size in this thread. and i see those ''something in the eye'' comments and they are using the small pic.Jubba said:^that size has already been posted...why again?

Jubba said:^that size has already been posted...why again?
There is a face in the lens.It looks like it could be the original Goblin mask with the eye lens raised up,or it could be disfigured Harry with a hood on.
BillLoomis said:It's his eyeball! I just asked if anyone else noticed the translucent look of the lens and saw parker's eye.

so i am stupid?Mr 7000+ said:Because stupidity comes in abundance within these boards.
dark_b said:so i am stupid?
Except maybe an ink blot...damn Sony and their mind games.venom4life said:i'll say it again, there is nothing in either eye.