Spiderman 3 compared to 1 & 2 - Why the hate?

Diemtay

Civilian
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
Points
11
Alright, we all know that 10-15 minutes of Peter acting like a cocky *****e bag with the emo hair was embarrassing, but with that aside, this movie wasn't 'that' much worse than 1 and 2, imo. I mean, I enjoyed all the movies, but 1 and 2 were far from being perfect, they were down right cringe inducing at times. I'll accept that Spiderman 3 is the worst of the trilogy, but it's not like 1 and 2 were that much better, at least that's how I see it in my book.
 
It wasn't just Peter's cringe worthy antics in his "dark" mode that brought the movie down. There's so many other things that lower the quality of it from it's predecessors:

- The Butler deux ex machina plot device telling Harry the truth about his father
- The ugly, ugly, UGLY relationship between Peter and MJ (Whining about her career, kissing Harry, not telling Peter she got fired then *****ing at him for not understanding how she feels etc). If ever there was two people who should not be together it's these two.
- Harry's lame plan of just breaking Peter and MJ up as revenge. Even worse was MJ just giving into Harry's weak threat. He never threatened her or Aunt May or anyone else. He just said "If you want Peter to live then you'll do something for me". Why didn't MJ just tell Peter what Harry was doing instead of breaking his heart? She of all people knows he has beaten greater odds and more powerful foes than Harry. She saw it first hand.
- Sandman being made the killer of Uncle Ben. This is self explanatory.
- New York being in love with Spider-Man. At best New York's attitude to Spider-Man should be mixed. We should not be seeing Spider-Man festivals. When have we ever seen NY love Spidey that much? Worst of all, we never even got to see Jonah's reaction to any of that. He should have been reaching for his heart pills.
- Not one of the three villains had a quarter of the villainous presence Goblin or Doc Ock had.
- Other annoying things during some of the action scenes like Peter putting more effort into trying to save a ring instead of stopping a villain, or Captain Stacy's nonchalant reaction to his daughter dangling a hundred storeys off a building, or the annoying extras in the final fight etc.
 
Last edited:
It wasn't just Peter's cringe worthy antics in his "dark" mode that brought the movie. There's so many other things that lower the quality of it from it's predecessors:

- The Butler deux ex machina plot device telling Harry the truth about his father
- The ugly, ugly, UGLY relationship between Peter and MJ (Whining about her career, kissing Harry, not telling Peter she got fired then *****ing at him for not understanding how she feels etc). If ever there was two people who should not be together it's these two.
- Harry's lame plan of just breaking Peter and MJ up as revenge. Even worse was MJ just giving into Harry's weak threat. He never threatened her or Aunt May or anyone else. He just said "If you want Peter to live then you'll do something for me". Why didn't MJ just tell Peter what Harry was doing instead of breaking his heart? She of all people knows he has beaten greater odds and more powerful foes than Harry. She saw it first hand.
- Sandman being made the killer of Uncle Ben. This is self explanatory.
- New York being in love with Spider-Man. At best New York's attitude to Spider-Man should be mixed. We should not be seeing Spider-Man festivals. When have we ever seen NY love Spidey that much? Worst of all, we never even got to see Jonah's reaction to any of that. He should have been reaching for his heart pills.
- Not one of the three villains had a quarter of the villainous presence Goblin or Doc Ock had.
- Other annoying things during some of the action scenes like Peter putting more effort into trying to save a ring instead of stopping a villain, or Captain Stacy's nonchalant reaction to his daughter dangling a hundred storeys off a building, or the annoying extras in the final fight etc.

This. Furthermore, I think that Spider-Man 3 was cursed by its own hype, which amplified the disappointment even further.
 
It wasn't just Peter's cringe worthy antics in his "dark" mode that brought the movie. There's so many other things that lower the quality of it from it's predecessors:

- The Butler deux ex machina plot device telling Harry the truth about his father
- The ugly, ugly, UGLY relationship between Peter and MJ (Whining about her career, kissing Harry, not telling Peter she got fired then *****ing at him for not understanding how she feels etc). If ever there was two people who should not be together it's these two.
- Harry's lame plan of just breaking Peter and MJ up as revenge. Even worse was MJ just giving into Harry's weak threat. He never threatened her or Aunt May or anyone else. He just said "If you want Peter to live then you'll do something for me". Why didn't MJ just tell Peter what Harry was doing instead of breaking his heart? She of all people knows he has beaten greater odds and more powerful foes than Harry. She saw it first hand.
- Sandman being made the killer of Uncle Ben. This is self explanatory.
- New York being in love with Spider-Man. At best New York's attitude to Spider-Man should be mixed. We should not be seeing Spider-Man festivals. When have we ever seen NY love Spidey that much? Worst of all, we never even got to see Jonah's reaction to any of that. He should have been reaching for his heart pills.
- Not one of the three villains had a quarter of the villainous presence Goblin or Doc Ock had.
- Other annoying things during some of the action scenes like Peter putting more effort into trying to save a ring instead of stopping a villain, or Captain Stacy's nonchalant reaction to his daughter dangling a hundred storeys off a building, or the annoying extras in the final fight etc.
All valid points, but I found just as many flaws in 1 and 2 to be honest. I mean, don't get me wrong, I enjoyed all three movies, I thought they were a lot of fun, but as I watched 1 & 2 the other day, I was cringing a lot, just as much as I was during 3.
 
It wasn't just Peter's cringe worthy antics in his "dark" mode that brought the movie down. There's so many other things that lower the quality of it from it's predecessors:

- The Butler deux ex machina plot device telling Harry the truth about his father
- The ugly, ugly, UGLY relationship between Peter and MJ (Whining about her career, kissing Harry, not telling Peter she got fired then *****ing at him for not understanding how she feels etc). If ever there was two people who should not be together it's these two.
- Harry's lame plan of just breaking Peter and MJ up as revenge. Even worse was MJ just giving into Harry's weak threat. He never threatened her or Aunt May or anyone else. He just said "If you want Peter to live then you'll do something for me". Why didn't MJ just tell Peter what Harry was doing instead of breaking his heart? She of all people knows he has beaten greater odds and more powerful foes than Harry. She saw it first hand.
- Sandman being made the killer of Uncle Ben. This is self explanatory.
- New York being in love with Spider-Man. At best New York's attitude to Spider-Man should be mixed. We should not be seeing Spider-Man festivals. When have we ever seen NY love Spidey that much? Worst of all, we never even got to see Jonah's reaction to any of that. He should have been reaching for his heart pills.
- Not one of the three villains had a quarter of the villainous presence Goblin or Doc Ock had.
- Other annoying things during some of the action scenes like Peter putting more effort into trying to save a ring instead of stopping a villain, or Captain Stacy's nonchalant reaction to his daughter dangling a hundred storeys off a building, or the annoying extras in the final fight etc.

This and the obvious lack of enthusiasm with the usage of the symbiote and Venom.

And to top it all of...the closures of certain characters and arcs were just horrible. No resolution to Penny which begs the question why Sam Raimi kept that storyline and half-assed it and then Spidey letting a VILLAIN float away :whatever:
 
Well, it would take too long to list everything that's wrong with the movie. But just off the top of my head... they did a terrible retcon of Uncle Ben's murder. The movie barely had a plot. Venom spent most of the movie on the floor in an apartment. The butler scene... that was the coup de grace.

Or just read what the Joker said, he said it better.
 
I understand what your saying - it's the same type of cheese in all three movies, the same Maguire style awkward oblivious Peter, the same pacing and style.

The problem for me is that the symbiote/Venom was my favourite villain of all time. And i'm first and foremost a Superman fan, so that's saying a lot.

And they failed so epically in depicting it.

The Symbiote is not supposed to make Spidey emo. He's not supposed to make him magically sexy. He's not supposed to make him good at dancing.

He's supposed to increase his paranoia, his impatience, and warp his sense of morality. Make him selfish and greedy and bitter, almost making him capable of murder.

And then when you come to Venom, which is so easy to get right. Look at Spectacular Spiderman. They got Venom right. Eddie Brock was a character Peter actually cared about, and with all the knowledge of what goes in in Pete's head, he was really able to mess with him.

I know that a lot of the reason Venom didn't work in the film is because they used up a lot of the time they could have had him screwing around with Pete's life, showing Sandman's story, and Peter and Harry's fighting...

But that's why it's a worse film!
 
Why?

Because it's terrible. SM3 kept the very worst of 1 and 2 (not saying that 1 and 2 are bad) and took it to the next lower level.
 
I'm in the minority here, but I think Spider-Man 3 is awesome. I might watch it again this weekend. I don't really get what's so "bad" about it. That's just me though.
 
My biggest problems with Spider-Man 3 that I didn't have with SM1 or SM2 was that the humor seeped into scenes and subplots it really didn't belong in, like the symbiote. Instead of the symbiote's influence being self-destructive, like many thought it would be after seeing the trailer, the symbiote's influence made himself look like a jackass in a sequence that felt like it came out of a parody of Spider-Man 3, not what the actual film.
 
I'm in the minority here, but I think Spider-Man 3 is awesome. I might watch it again this weekend. I don't really get what's so "bad" about it. That's just me though.

I don't hate Spider-Man 3, I think it has obvious flaws like every movie has more or less. As the way at looking at things (in this case a movie) is different from being to being and depends on personal taste, background, mindset etc etc. , it actually doesn't make sense arguing...:awesome:

In my opinion many people hate the third movie because of
-beeing comic fans of Venom
-they expected greater actions
-they think of dancing and singing as something disconcerting
-they hated the crying and relationship problems
-are discontent with the Harry/Peter/the Butler-thing
-they don't get the point why Sandman is suddenly Uncle Ben's murderer
-feel like to much stuff is happing in one movie without deep insights
-they are missing the spider-sense in non-Venom related scence
-they don't see an evil Peter/Spidey
....
And really, I'm annoyed with many such things in the third movie, which I just listed, or others listed before.
But after watching S-M3 again after many years and additionally watching the whole trilogy in a row, I must admit I love the trilogy and I like S-M3 more than it's usually liked.
Now I see, even if it's questionably after all, why they make the Sandman to Ben's killer. And I also accept the dancing and wannabe-womanzier Peter, because real dark situations are there, too.
What I like at the Spidey movies in general, is the focus on the persons, the relationships and Peter Parker's growth as a identifying hero with flaws and problems.
Peter hunts and kills in S-M1 Ben's putative murderer. Not everybody would agree, he killed him. But imo Peter could have just rescued him with his web. Thus he approved his dead. Because he wanted revenge. After this, he decided to go the right way. But didn't ever resolve his revenge-problem. Til S-M3. And here you are! Before the symbiont ever grab Peter, he shows his new blazed up thirst for revenge in the police department. So after all, it's not that bad they put sandman in this position into the script. Because it's a great part of telling Peter's development in revenge.
And this time he learns to forgive, he doesn't repeat his flaw of S-M1.

And to te point, S-M3 isn't dark enough...Beside Spidey shows some really ugly flaws even without the symbiont (e.g. damn kiss with Gwen Stacy), he really thought Sandman dead so he comit murder on that plane. And he did push Eddie against the wall, and he did push the bouncer and he did hit MJ. And as to dancing Pete- c'mon he is a nerd after all and maybe it isn't that unbelievable after all, he would act exaggerated silly under the influence of the black stuff.

I could count more things, but to put it in a nutshell, as I appreciate the revenge-story and do see evil Peter beside one-liners and jazz- I really enjoy watching Spiderman 3 and the others movies.
Spiderman is all, dramatic, seriously, comical, morally and a great action trilogy. The third compared to 1&2 is more complicated in some ways (in others lower) and I think it's important to give this movie the chance of a second or third watch.


[sorry for my bad English]:yay:
 
I don't hate Spider-Man 3, I think it has obvious flaws like every movie has more or less. As the way at looking at things (in this case a movie) is different from being to being and depends on personal taste, background, mindset etc etc. , it actually doesn't make sense arguing...:awesome:

In my opinion many people hate the third movie because of
-beeing comic fans of Venom
-they expected greater actions
-they think of dancing and singing as something disconcerting
-they hated the crying and relationship problems
-are discontent with the Harry/Peter/the Butler-thing
-they don't get the point why Sandman is suddenly Uncle Ben's murderer
-feel like to much stuff is happing in one movie without deep insights
-they are missing the spider-sense in non-Venom related scence
-they don't see an evil Peter/Spidey
....
And really, I'm annoyed with many such things in the third movie, which I just listed, or others listed before.
But after watching S-M3 again after many years and additionally watching the whole trilogy in a row, I must admit I love the trilogy and I like S-M3 more than it's usually liked.
Now I see, even if it's questionably after all, why they make the Sandman to Ben's killer. And I also accept the dancing and wannabe-womanzier Peter, because real dark situations are there, too.
What I like at the Spidey movies in general, is the focus on the persons, the relationships and Peter Parker's growth as a identifying hero with flaws and problems.
Peter hunts and kills in S-M1 Ben's putative murderer. Not everybody would agree, he killed him. But imo Peter could have just rescued him with his web. Thus he approved his dead. Because he wanted revenge. After this, he decided to go the right way. But didn't ever resolve his revenge-problem. Til S-M3. And here you are! Before the symbiont ever grab Peter, he shows his new blazed up thirst for revenge in the police department. So after all, it's not that bad they put sandman in this position into the script. Because it's a great part of telling Peter's development in revenge.
And this time he learns to forgive, he doesn't repeat his flaw of S-M1.

And to te point, S-M3 isn't dark enough...Beside Spidey shows some really ugly flaws even without the symbiont (e.g. damn kiss with Gwen Stacy), he really thought Sandman dead so he comit murder on that plane. And he did push Eddie against the wall, and he did push the bouncer and he did hit MJ. And as to dancing Pete- c'mon he is a nerd after all and maybe it isn't that unbelievable after all, he would act exaggerated silly under the influence of the black stuff.

I could count more things, but to put it in a nutshell, as I appreciate the revenge-story and do see evil Peter beside one-liners and jazz- I really enjoy watching Spiderman 3 and the others movies.
Spiderman is all, dramatic, seriously, comical, morally and a great action trilogy. The third compared to 1&2 is more complicated in some ways (in others lower) and I think it's important to give this movie the chance of a second or third watch.


[sorry for my bad English]:yay:

Agree, for the most part. Another thing was the hype: We were told that SM3 was going to be better than SM2. In hind sight, the signs were there. We knew that Sandman would be revealed as Uncle Ben's killer, we knew that the symbiote suit would look like a black version of the red-and-blue suit, we knew that Sam Raimi didn't want to use Venom, we knew that there would be multiple villains, as opposed to one as in Spider-Man & Spider-Man 2 (where they considered multiple villains and decided against it). I think we all just believed that with Raimi at the wheel, it would all turn out to be that film we were promised that would top Spider-Man 2.
 
To me, it made Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer watchable.
 
I thought it was just fine. The first two had their flaws and silly plot holes or coincidences and so did the third film and most movies out there. If I hated it, you all would know by now lol.

To each their own.
 
I don't think I've really spoke to a poster who was a huge Raimi fan and hated Spider-Man 3, so it'll be hard to imagine if you spoke up if you didn't enjoy the film, imho.

But, yes, the first two installments may have had silly plot holes and/or coincidences, but S-M 3 had much, much more of that. And as much as I hate Spider-Man 3, I did enjoy the films best scenes: the birth of Sandman and the birth of Venom.
 
While I'm totally aware of the flaws I still enjoy this movie.
 
When I hate something, I let people know.

Like, the new suit. :o
 
Joker said:
- Other annoying things during some of the action scenes like Peter putting more effort into trying to save a ring instead of stopping a villain, or Captain Stacy's nonchalant reaction to his daughter dangling a hundred storeys off a building, or the annoying extras in the final fight etc.

Pete saving the wedding ring during the fight, c'mon, that was a nice touch, it was not as if the villan was threatening the public, he was just after Pete, it would have been different if he was doing something along the lines of the Goblin at the parade.
and you're exagerating the focus put on it, he tried webbing the ring while going through a window, not exactly changing his direction there at all, and only the once after did he specifically web swing in the direction of the ring.

Of course I agree with the Captain Stacey scene, that is the worst moment of directing in the entire film.

Joker said:
- The ugly, ugly, UGLY relationship between Peter and MJ (Whining about her career, kissing Harry, not telling Peter she got fired then *****ing at him for not understanding how she feels etc). If ever there was two people who should not be together it's these two.
- Harry's lame plan of just breaking Peter and MJ up as revenge. Even worse was MJ just giving into Harry's weak threat. He never threatened her or Aunt May or anyone else. He just said "If you want Peter to live then you'll do something for me". Why didn't MJ just tell Peter what Harry was doing instead of breaking his heart? She of all people knows he has beaten greater odds and more powerful foes than Harry. She saw it first hand.

- MJ was supposed to be acting badly sometimes, same as her counterparts Pete and Harry. The movie was about everyone's dark sides.

- on Mj and her reaction to Harry's blackmail. Ok, you have a good argument there, but you could also say that she had never been wrapped up in this superhero business before, she didn't want to risk Pete or Harry killing the other in combat, so she played along with Harry's plan for the time being, not knowing what else to do, biding her time until she could think of a way to approach Pete about the situation, without him rushing off to take on Harry, after all the Burglar and GG1 both were inadvertantly killed during battles with Pete, and MJ at least knew about the burglar's death, as she said.
Whole different ball game it being one of their friends as the villan.

It is wonky though, for other reasons, she was acting like it was a genuine break up at the jazz club, whereas it was done under duress.

- Not one of the three villains had a quarter of the villainous presence Goblin or Doc Ock had.

- The Butler deux ex machina plot device telling Harry the truth about his father

- I thought Harry carried weight as a villan, we watched his build up over the two previous movies, knowing, as far as he was concerned, he had good reason to get Pete/SM, so when he finally confronts Pete it is in one of the most satisfactory action face offs in sh movies, second only to the train fight in SM2.
We also got to see him struggle over the friendship and his misguided duty to his father, the butler scene was not even needed in that regard, it can be ignored.

that is the thing about the butler scene, it *can* be ignored and the movie can logically progress without it, Harry just realising that aye, maybe he should take his friend's word over his deranged visions of his dead father. The fact of his friends being in mortal danger making him face up to that all too possible reality.

Also, he was good cause he knew how to push Pete's buttons.

Venom was better here than in the books, a weak, spineless fantasist guy getting access to that kind of power, scarier than the bodybuilder of the books, who was used to having power over his fellow man, and had a code of honour.

- New York being in love with Spider-Man. At best New York's attitude to Spider-Man should be mixed. We should not be seeing Spider-Man festivals. When have we ever seen NY love Spidey that much? Worst of all, we never even got to see Jonah's reaction to any of that. He should have been reaching for his heart pills.

The 'NY loves Spider-man' plot was necessary to explore the nature of pride before a fall, that was a theme of the film.
Having it at all in that way, acknowledges the fact that previous to this he was regarded with a mixed reaction.

I agree Jonah was wasted in the film in that regard though, good point.

Joker said:
- Sandman being made the killer of Uncle Ben. This is self explanatory.

Agreed. If you wanted dark Spidey to have a reason to kill, have Sandman put Aunt May into a coma during his rampage.
Raimi obviously wanted to explore the themes of pride, fall, and redemption through forgiveness, and have Pete confront Ben's killer and forgive him, to give the trilogy some kind of closure to that pivotal moment in his genesis.

But, not at the expense of screwing up one of the greatest sh origins in comics and film, great because it is so simple, but effective, any kid can understand that origin, now, it is clumsy and complicated.

Something else I was thinking about the last time I watched the film, I've always thought the 'Saturday Night Parker' sequence was pretty funny, but the thing is, the Jazz club scene takes place right after it, that is overkill with the musical numbers.
What they should have done was just make the jazz club scene straight drama, because everything else in the scene in fine as played, we get some good dramatic scenes with Pete acting crazy and violent.
 
Last edited:
I still like the film alot and still have an obsession with it,although over the years I've lost a bit of my love for it. I still find the movie fun,entertaining and in a few places,rather heartwarming. But...the more and more I watch it,the more some things kinda bother me. There are the little things,of course. Like the butler moment,Harry's memory loss and the bad crowd scenes. But two things that REALLY stick out are....


-Of course,my biggest beef with the movie has always been how Venom and the symbiote storyline were screwed over. The symbiote should've scared the hell out of not only Peter,but us as an audience. The film should've had a more complex and darker story about how this thing affects Peter. No explaination was given about where it came from(besides from space,I mean),or how it really enhanced Spidey's powers or even how it transferred all of Peter's memories to Eddie and how Venom could block Spider-man's spider sense....we really got nothing! Instead it was played for laughs. And Venom was barely in the movie,and when he was he wasn't the least bit scary or seemed to be a threat. He looked awesome,but we barely got to see him because Topher kept pulling back the symbiote from his face. Probably the only moment in the film that represented what I wanted(and hoped)to see was when Peter removed the symbiote in the bell tower and Venom"s creation(Awesome scene! Probably my favorite in the series). And then there's Venom asking Sandman for help,kidnapping MJ;etc,etc.... Just such a waste of one of Spidey's greatest villains.

- Mary Jane. Now,I understand what Raimi was trying for. He wanted to show that Peter was neglecting the people in his life that mattered most because of his own pride and arrogance,and that was even before he got the symbiote. But MJ just comes off as a whining,jealous,self important,stupid cheater. I mean,she agreed at the end of part 2 to accept that Peter is Spider-man. She understood,or at least I thought she did,that sometimes Peter's responsibilities as Spider-man would have to come first. But she acts like a little child at times,constantly sulking because she doesn't get her way. Watching the film now makes me always ask myself,"Why does Peter love this girl and why are they even together?!" I mean,where's the communication between these two?? Like at the dinner scene. She gets pissed off at Peter because he can't seem to figure out that she was fired from her show. Huh? How is he supposed to know this? Then,later on she runs to Harry and almost cheats on Peter(btw,she seems run to different men alot in these films) and when Harry threatens Peter,she decides it's better to break up with him then tell him what's really going on? Peter IS Spider-man and fights super criminals all the time!! Doesn't she think Peter can handle this??! Ugh. I don't know. I don't blame Kirsten at all,but MJ was just a horrible character in this film.
 
The entire trilogy was a complete mess.
 
:facepalm:

Just, don't listen to anything KAW says. His opinions are something of comedic value.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,153
Messages
21,907,325
Members
45,704
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"