Well i think i'll pass on the game since i'm not much of a 'gamer'. The dvds is another kettle of fish; i'm buying the ultimate set and the SR dvd.Showtime029 said:Right now, all I care about is the DVD's and the video game. Almost time.
I SEE SPIDEY said:Tremendous legs? You obviously don't know what that means, although it's legs aren't bad at all and are pretty decent for a summer movie, they are far from tremendous. Tremendous is opening with a little over 70mil in five days and reaching 305 million dollars.
We get 13 instead of 14 discs in the Ultimate set.Showtime029 said:I already put my reserve in on the Ultimate Collection, and I'm excited about Superman Returns and Justice League Heroes for PS2.
I just realized that you and most of the people who like the movie know absolutely nothing about the boxoffice. Thats okay, because it isn't important but it does mean that I'm going to ignore your opinions on it.Freddy_Krueger said:The movie made $800,000 three weeks in a row and made over a million Labor Day weekend. The fact that the film is still kicking 100 DAYS after it's initial release is tremendous.
I SEE SPIDEY said:I just realized that you and most of the people who like the movie know absolutely nothing about the boxoffice. Thats okay, because it isn't important but it does mean that I'm going to ignore your opinions on it.![]()
Most films released in the summer time are still playing in the dollar theaters 100 days later unless they are like poseidon. So this is no big feat. Happens all the time to even really bad films.Freddy_Krueger said:I know
A) it usually takes double the production budget to cover a film's cost
B) The more money the better (duh)
and
C) If a film is still playing to audiences 100 days after release and makes more than the 185-190 it was said it would make, that it has some nice legs as opposed to the no legs many on here were clamoring it had.
But then again, what do I know? I'm dumb. But go ahead and ignore me.![]()
buggs0268 said:Most films released in the summer time are still playing in the dollar theaters 100 days later unless they are like poseidon. So this is no big feat. Happens all the time to even really bad films.
Actually it was touted as making Spiderman 2 numbers before it's release. so the fact that it is struggling to make 200 mill is embarrassing. More so that Warner's was begging first run theater chaing managers to keep the film in their theaters one more week for 75 percent fo the gross, and the theater manager stating 75% of nothing is still nothing.
buggs0268 said:Most films released in the summer time are still playing in the dollar theaters 100 days later unless they are like poseidon. So this is no big feat. Happens all the time to even really bad films.
Actually it was touted as making Spiderman 2 numbers before it's release. so the fact that it is struggling to make 200 mill is embarrassing. More so that Warner's was begging first run theater chaing managers to keep the film in their theaters one more week for 75 percent fo the gross, and the theater manager stating 75% of nothing is still nothing. It is an embarrassment as it was tipped to be the big hit of the summer and to go head to head with POTC, and not the very smaller fare. And a film that was released on the same weekend, Devil Wears Prada, is still in a lot of first run theaters and beat it out of weekly many weeks this summer. SR just had a bigger 1st and 2nd week that put it ahead. but after that it was fighting with DWP. Now that is sad. DWP was also not in Imax 3D, which gave SR's domestic another 20 something million.
\S/JcDc\S/ said:http://www.tmz.com/2006/07/10/exclusive-super-200-million-man-or-else/9#comments
Posted Jul 10th 2006 8:13PM
Status. The first run theaters charge more money, and the more money a film makes, the bigger it's box office. Warner's wants it to make 200 mill domestic to get hit status, and the way it was looking, keeping the film in first run theaters longer is a better way of doing it.Freddy_Krueger said:Please please please post a source for your "Warner's begging the first run theaters" claim. I've read or heard no such thing, and the very idea of it makes no sense. Why offer 75% of the first run theater gross? Even if it were making tons of money, that does nothing for Warner Brothers or the film itself. So I'm calling bull.
And I think if a film can make more than the pessimists claimed it would make, like SR has, then it's not pathetic.
I didn't say that you were dumb I just said that you don't know s**t about the boxoffice and you don't, so don't be offended.Freddy_Krueger said:I know
A) it usually takes double the production budget to cover a film's cost
B) The more money the better (duh)
and
C) If a film is still playing to audiences 100 days after release and makes more than the 185-190 it was said it would make, that it has some nice legs as opposed to the no legs many on here were clamoring it had.
But then again, what do I know? I'm dumb. But go ahead and ignore me.![]()