bunk
superhero fan
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
- Messages
- 9,483
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 56
You don't see a reason for them to strike while the iron is hot? People have short memories so you do need to strike while the iron is hot.
After four year people will forget whether they liked the movie or not?
Would it have been fine for them to wait five or six or seven years just because they could get the cast and crew back together?
It wouldn't be fine for the studio. I'm sure they would prefer to make the money as quickly as possible (Transformers anyone?), but there's no reason a sequel couldn't be just as successful after that much time. It would be a matter of creating a story that works accounts for the difference in age.
I'm not saying that the movie will fail or not be a huge hit but this wait is a huge risk. And also, people age. Do they all want the youngish cast to be in their 40's when/if the 3rd movie comes out? There are just so many reasons that this wait is ridiculous IMHO.
The cast aging is actually good point, though it doesn't concern me so much. To me, the idea of switching directors is even more ridiculous.