Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]537851[/split]
Originally posted by Tacit Ronin
If that was the case, more Hollywood movies would follow that template. I think it's because of streamlining production time.
Why set up complex lighting and set ups for interesting shots when you can just shoot it like s sit com.
2 hrs 15 mins.We have a runtime for BP yet?
Different shots will produce different results. This comes with the odd way they finish Marvel movies. Their green screen love and all. Why film at an actual location with sets, when you can just green screen 60% of it?
The images on the previous thread looked bad, these look gorgeous. Which one will we get?
This is well... accurate.They need the flexibility to completely change the location of the shot in post...
Well from what I can tell those are not screenshots, they're official pictures. Clips are more accurate because that's the closest to the finished product. Besides, I don't get what's so gorgeous about them aside from the costumes? The cinematography itself is still weak.
Well from what I can tell those are not screenshots, they're official pictures. Clips are more accurate because that's the closest to the finished product. Besides, I don't get what's so gorgeous about them aside from the costumes? The cinematography itself is still weak.
I screencap those from this link.
https://video-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v...=13bf7caabea06a30190d13d2a3b1c391&oe=5A7004CE
You mean casino?
Based on the few reactions we've seen, I don't think it's going to be Marvel's first miss.7 minutes to find out if the MCU is a consensus 18/18