TheVileOne
Eternal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 70,841
- Reaction score
- 15,078
- Points
- 103
The clickbait articles I'm seeing writing theories about this movie are almost as hilarious as the ones people come up with for Star Wars.
I think people might be thinking too literally about a palindromic film. Like I don't think the film will play in reverse or anything like that. It'll probably be along the lines of Netflix's Dark. This idea that the end is the beginning and the beginning is the end.
I could imagine Nolan forming this film around the Bootstrap Paradox. Imagine you have to build some great piece of tech, but you don't know how. The tech exists in the future though and your future self goes back in time to give your present self the text. And then it turns out this text is written by you. So you build the tech based on instructions you as you know yourself never wrote and inevitably return the text to your past self. And so you have this object that has no discernible origin in time. You receive it in the past, carry it into the future, then return it to the past. The cycle repeats endlessly. The end is the beginning and the beginning is the end. A palindrome.
Nolan being Nolan, I wouldn't be shocked if he made film about trying to find the origin of an object like that. All wild speculation on my part of course.
I didn't get to see it eitherI didn't get to see it during Hobbs & Shaw but I did saw the leak... it's such a Nolan teaser.
Robert Pattinson would make a good Leon Kennedy in a Resident Evil movie.
Jeffrey Kurland's impeccable taste. Excellent costume work in Inception and Tenet looks just as great.
That's what I was thinking a couple of pages back. Kurland does a much better job modernizing classic tailoring than most of the costume designers used on the Craig Bond films. The suit Washington is wearing in the teaser in the bullet hole in the glass scene looks excellent and Bondian, based on what little I can see of it. Similarly, Washington's casual attire with Debicki in the Italian scene is very stylish and Bondian.I am surprised Eon never poached Jeffery Kurland. He would be perfect for Bond.
I don't think that using 35mm or 70mm is a question of progress/regress. Technical limitations, artistic intent - a lot of stuff is considered when they choose tools. Dunkirk was a bit different from other films of Nolan. It had limited dialogue.You thought Nolan would regress back to 35mm after what he accomplished with Dunkirk?