Terminator: Genisys - Part 7

Rate the Movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ya'll talking timelines and time travel, it's time for some purple. Before I go, I'd like to recommend a small low budget time travel movie called TimeCrimes. Ya'll can thank me later.
 
They become meaningless because it means they have no affect on the future. For me I could care less about alternate timelines stories, whether there's one or a billion of them, what I care about is the story that prevents Judgement Day. Whether John Conner exists in another timeline is frankly irrelevant to me, I really don't care.

They are the series of events that lead to the future, they are no more meaningless than any prequel or historical account. So you choose to invest in one timeline where the war doesn't happens and ignore the other timeline where John's father came from. Fair enough. You still know the war happened.
 
Assuming Skynet invented time travel, it was the use of this technology (for the purpose of killing John Connor) that caused both Skynet and Connor to exist. Skynet seemed to unintentionally create itself and the person who destroyed it.

My understanding of the 'single timeline model' is that because the past always precedes the present any change you make to the past should have already occurred before the act of you changing it. Meaning that it's impossible to alter the past in such a way that you prevent the act of you altering the past. This is similar to the story 'the Time Machine' where the inventor is unable to use time travel to prevent his wife's death, because her death is the reason for him using the time machine.

The basic idea of single timeline is that if you plan to go back in time to change something you've automatically failed because history dictates that change never came into effect in the first place. In short, history is written in stone.
 
Am I the only one who was bothered by how fake John's scares look?
 
The basic idea of single timeline is that if you plan to go back in time to change something you've automatically failed because history dictates that change never came into effect in the first place. In short, history is written in stone.

I don't think it's right to say it never came into effect. In a single timeline model, if one week from now I get in a time machine and travel to today, then I should appear in front of me right now, despite the fact that I haven't yet experienced the moment where I travel back in time. At the moment I appear in front of me, I am then predestined to travel back in time in one week. Any failure to do so on my part would be impossible, otherwise I never would have witnessed myself appear from the future.
 
Assuming Skynet invented time travel, it was the use of this technology (for the purpose of killing John Connor) that caused both Skynet and Connor to exist. Skynet seemed to unintentionally create itself and the person who destroyed it.

My understanding of the 'single timeline model' is that because the past always precedes the present any change you make to the past should have already occurred before the act of you changing it. Meaning that it's impossible to alter the past in such a way that you prevent the act of you altering the past. This is similar to the story 'the Time Machine' where the inventor is unable to use time travel to prevent his wife's death, because her death is the reason for him using the time machine.
This is exactly how it works. The machines doom themselves. John can't exist if they don't create the time machine. They don't create the time machine if John doesn't exist.

The machines never learned that old adage. You create what you fear. They are responsible for John Connor.
 
The basic idea of single timeline is that if you plan to go back in time to change something you've automatically failed because history dictates that change never came into effect in the first place. In short, history is written in stone.
But the only one who knows this is John. That is the point. John is the only one who lives the whole timeline. The one who knows everything. It is why he knows when to send his father and the Terminator back. It is why who John's father is, is kept a secret.

How I interpret it.
Is Macbeth ruined because the witches predictions come true? Of course not.
 
The existence of Kyle and John does establish it as fact.

It does no such thing. Kyle's conception has nothing to do with the loop, only John's. The movie starts with them on course to Judgment Day happening but by then end, they've averted it.

Except it is not unknown as established by the first two films. Sarah thinks it is unknown. She is wrong. She is wrong a lot. :funny:

It's not about what a fictional character thinks. It's about what Cameron is telling the audience. He wants them to think that they were successful and Judgment Day had been averted.


You assume that stopping Judgment Day is the only way they can achieve victory. It ignores that by trainng John and keeping him alive, he will save the human race. Defeat the machines and establish his own existence by sending himself back in time. Why do you think the terminator in T2 is there? To keep John alive. It is the same reason Kyle goes back. They need John to live. That is like saying there is no victory at the end of the first film because Judgment Day is coming.

Repairing the relationship between John and Sarah also probably helped a bit.

Then it completely undermines the second half of T2. After Sarah's nightmare, she could have taken off to Mexico and hid with John until the bombs dropped but left to find Dyson and prevent the war, once and for all.


Yes, because humanity survives. They defeat the machines thanks to the actions of John, Sarah, Kyle and Uncle Bob.

After most of the planet had already been nuked in a Nuclear fire. THAT'S ONE HAPPY ENDING! :funny:


Look Darth, I'm just not buying your argument. There's nothing you can say to convince me that the entire point of T2 was that Judgment Day was inevitable. A film where they continuously tell us there is NO FATE and spend most of it trying to change the course of history.

What was the point of blowing up Cyberdyne? Or Miles Dyson's heroic sacrifice? Or even Uncle Bob's heroic sacrifice at the end of the film, when he's lowered into the lava, so nobody would ever be able to continue Dyson's work and cause Judgment Day.

All of that is completely UNDERMINED, if you look at the film with the mentality that it was all for nothing because JD is going to happen regardless.
 
I don't think it's right to say it never came into effect. In a single timeline model, if one week from now I get in a time machine and travel to today, then I should appear in front of me right now, despite the fact that I haven't yet experienced the moment where I travel back in time. At the moment I appear in front of me, I am then predestined to travel back in time in one week. Any failure to do so on my part would be impossible, otherwise I never would have witnessed myself appear from the future.

You're basically describing a similar thing but in a different way, more of a future tense. If you go back in time to kill Hitler history dictates whatever you tried failed because ultimately Hitler survived, you're predestined to fail even before you step back in time.
 
You're basically describing a similar thing but in a different way, more of a future tense. If you go back in time to kill Hitler history dictates whatever you tried failed because ultimately Hitler survived, you're predestined to fail even before you step back in time.

You fail in your intended goal, but what ever 'change' you do make will come into effect, or more appropriately already came into effect.
 
You might fail in your intended goal, but what ever 'change' you do make will come into effect, or more appropriately already came into effect.

Which means there was never any change in the first place, you going back in time and failing to kill Hitler, and all the consequences that come with that, is exactly how it should be and how history recorded it. We're on the same page with what a singular timeline is I think, I just choose to ignore it being a factor in T1 and T2.
 
All of that is completely UNDERMINED, if you look at the film with the mentality that it was all for nothing because JD is going to happen regardless.

JD still did happen in the timeline Kyle Reese was sent from, and that truth remains even if T2 took place in an alternative timeline where the war is prevented.
 
All this timeline talk:

cross-eyed.png
 
Which means there was never any change in the first place, you going back in time and failing to kill Hitler, and all the consequences that come with that, is exactly how it should be and how history recorded it.

Yeah, I use the word change loosely. All I really mean is that an object from one point in time did in fact travel into the past.

We're on the same page with what a singular timeline is I think, I just choose to ignore it being a factor in T1 and T2.

It's undeniably a factor in T1 though, because we observe that Skynet's attempt to kill John Connor resulted in his birth. This means that the present in which Skynet alters the past does exist on a single timeline with the past it altered.
I guess you can still argue there is both a single timeline where Skynet creates itself/John Connor, as well as an alternate timeline where T2 exists, but I don't understand under what conditions time travel creates a loop instead of an alternate timeline.
 
It does no such thing. Kyle's conception has nothing to do with the loop, only John's. The movie starts with them on course to Judgment Day happening but by then end, they've averted it.
I didn't say Kyle conception, but his existence. He goes back, he is there, it happened. He can only do that if there is a war in the future and a time machine to send him back. The time machine is built by the machines.

It's not about what a fictional character thinks. It's about what Cameron is telling the audience. He wants them to think that they were successful and Judgment Day had been averted.
So we ignore everything the films tell us because of an opened ended speech at the end?

By the way, using your theory, it doesn't mean Judgment Day is averted. Remember, if it is open ended, all is on the table.

Then it completely undermines the second half of T2. After Sarah's nightmare, she could have taken off to Mexico and hid with John until the bombs dropped but left to find Dyson and prevent the war, once and for all.
Do you remember when Sarah is about to kill Dyson? She doesn't. Why? She is a human, a mother. She cares. The second half of T2 reestablished her relationship with John. They also stopped the T-1000 and thus kept John alive. The final 20 mins of T2 is about keeping John alive. They move on from blowing up Cyberdyne, to protecting John.

After most of the planet had already been nuked in a Nuclear fire. THAT"S ONE HAPPY ENDING! :funny:


Look Darth, I'm just not buying your argument. There's nothing you can say to convince me that the entire point of T2 was the Judgment Day was inevitable. A film where they continuously tell us there is NO FATE and spend most of it trying to change to course of history.

What was the point of blowing up Cyberdyne? Or Miles Dyson's heroic sacrifice? Or even Uncle Bob's heroic sacrifice at the end of the film, when he's lowered into the lava, so nobody would ever be able to continue Dyson's work and cause Judgment Day.

All of that is completely UNDERMINED, if you look at the film with the mentality that it was all for nothing because JD is going to happen regardless.
I never said Judgment Day being inevitable is what T2 is about. Judgment Day is inevitable, that is the arc of the series, but that isn't the point of T2. T2 is about the relationship between John and his various parents (Sarah, Bob, fosters), Sarah's paranoia, and how it has effected both her and her son. Have you ever considered why Uncle Bob is sent back specifically to when he is? Or why John didn't just send him with Kyle back to 84? Because he knows what is suppose to happen.

People doing what is right is never undermined, as the entire objective is to win the war against the machines. Does Kyle's death undermined the first film? of course not, because the entire mission is to keep John alive. They start undermining the series starting with Salvation and now this film.

And yes, I find ultimate human triumph against all the odds, quite uplifting.
 
I'm not versed in Shakespeare so the comparison is lost on me.
Basically, a man is told how he will die by a group of witches, and goes out of his way to prevent it. In doing so, he ensures it. That is what the machines do in Terminator. In their attempt to stop John, they ensure his existences and thus their downfall.
 
And yes, I find ultimate human triumph against all the odds, quite uplifting.

Sorry, I just don't see it. Not the way you do. T2 symbolizes that a person control's their own destiny. That was always Cameron's intention and that's why the film resonates with me.
 
Ya'll talking timelines and time travel, it's time for some purple. Before I go, I'd like to recommend a small low budget time travel movie called TimeCrimes. Ya'll can thank me later.
I saw it years ago and I liked it quite a bit.
 
Sorry, I just don't see it. Not the way you do. T2 symbolizes that a person control's their own destiny. That was always Cameron's intention and that's why the film resonates with me.

Unless you're Skynet, in which case you're doomed to cause your own destruction.
 
Sorry, I just don't see it. Not the way you do. T2 symbolizes that a person control's their own destiny. That was always Cameron's intention and that's why the film resonates with me.
So lets just ignore that the movie can't function without the loop. That is up to you. Of course, it makes no sense, but fine. But frack narrative and actual sense. Forget that both films firmly establishes things that need the loop to exist. It is why you ignored the rest of the post anyways. There is no answer to why John sent back his father and terminator to two different times otherwise. :funny:
 
So lets just ignore that the movie can't function without the loop. That is up to you. Of course, it makes no sense, but fine. But frack narrative and actual sense.

It can function without the loop. They break the loop and Judgment Day is averted. It makes perfect sense. The films screams NO FATE at you. It spells it out but you choose to ignore it.
 
So lets just ignore that the movie can't function without the loop. That is up to you. Of course, it makes no sense, but fine. But frack narrative and actual sense. Forget that both films firmly establishes things that need the loop to exist. It is why you ignored the rest of the post anyways. There is no answer to why John sent back his father and terminator to two different times otherwise. :funny:

You edited your post. :funny:

Just to respond, I ignored most of your post because I've been trying to explain it to you for the last six hours but we haven't gotten anywhere. Would another counter point have changed your mind or gotten us anywhere other than going in the same circle?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,338
Messages
22,087,604
Members
45,887
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"