Secret Fawful
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2007
- Messages
- 2,577
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
I can't believe the Gervais hate in here.
Seems there set on hiring then firing popular comedians.
Week one hundred and fifty-four - January 2011
Thanks to the twitterverse, the blogosphere, all the journos and the coolest stars for coming to my rescue.
It was heartwarming to realise I wasn't losing my mind. Some reactions nearly had me believing I'd gone too far too. Nearly.
Can't wait for the people who thought it was over the top to see my stand-up shows. **** me, they will **** themselves.
Oh, and fans, take this opportunity to tell the world about Karl Pilkington. Tweet about that ****ing head now!
All new Ricky Gervais Show this Friday on HBO and An Idiot Abroad on Science Channel 22nd Jan.
A genuine thanks by the way for all your support.
Cheers.
Back in New York. From 80 degrees to 20 in a few hours. Still it was nice to get a bit of winter sun.
I enjoyed the Globes more this year. I think I had better gags. More along the lines of the Mel Gibson one last year.
Obviously the rumour that the organizers stopped me going out on stage for an hour is rubbish. I did every link I was scheduled to do. The reason why the gaps were uneven is because when I got the rundown I was allowed to choose who I presented to. I obviously chose the spots that I had the best gags for. They couldn't move around the order but I could move around however I wanted.
All the same conspiracy theories as last year too... "So and so was offended"... "hasn't been invited back yet"... exactly the same as last time. "Paul McCartney was furious"... no he wasn't. And nor was Tim Allen and Tom Hanks. I was drinking with them after.
Why do people have to embellish? They're allowed to say they hated it. They're allowed to say they didn't find it funny, that it was tasteless, over the top, or whatever. But why do they speculate and make stuff up?
Don't worry, I know the answer. Because it's more interesting than "it went fine and some people won some awards and then went to a party". But that's all that happened.
Actually, I see what they mean. Boring. So here's what really happened. Bruce Willis and Sly Stallone started a fight with me but Alec Baldwin and Mark Walberg stepped in and helped me out. That's what happened.
JAK®;19519923 said:Considering the fact that the two characters they play are very different, no, he doesn't
I know I'm behind, but The Walking Dead got f'n robbed.
And good grief did the Glee kids butcher Don't Stop Believing.
You seriously think that The Walking Dead was the best drama series ofthe year. Really? I am happy to say that I watch 4 of the 5 nominated shows (TWD, Boardwalk Empire, Mad Men and Dexter) and all of those were better dramas.
As for Glee. She show is spectacular, and amazingly original so it's a well deserved award.
Yeah, both characters were office managers, but their characters aren't similar. The Office US and The Office UK are two very different shows in tone and style of humour, and which one is better depends entirely on your individual preference.Doesn't Gervais play the office manager as well?
Boardwalk Empire bored me to death, Dexter wasn't as good as other years, still great though, Mad Men as well, so yeah the Walking Dead got robbed.
Glee sucks ass, but what I was saying is that they butchered Can't Stop Believing. It sounded like it came from one of those Kids Bop albums that you see advertised on the Disney channel. http://www.kidzbop.com/
They need to stick to covering Justin Beiber and Lady Gaga, and quit butchering classics.
I haven't even heard of The Walking Dead.
I was until Brendan Fraser showed up. Then I was all like