The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man (Deleted Scenes & Visual Changes) - Part 1

If the article wasn't added and was there originally it could be because he feels his father up and left him and went and died. If he didn't just leave one night he never would of been on the plane.

I can't go into the mind if someone abandoned but I don't think I would be mad at my father in that situation....cause if they didn't leave me with Ben and May I would be dead in the plane crash with them. To me if we never saw the article then we'd think they'd still be out there.
 
If the article wasn't added and was there originally it could be because he feels his father up and left him and went and died. If he didn't just leave one night he never would of been on the plane.

I suppose. But the way Garfield said the line about "Why isn't my father here to tell me that? Where is he?" it came across like he still didn't know what happened to his parents and that all he knew was they had up and abandoned him. In some ways, the scene would have been better if the film did not have the article about the plane crash was not included and would have actually added to the mystery about what happened to them and why they had to leave.

I can't go into the mind if someone abandoned but I don't think I would be mad at my father in that situation....cause if they didn't leave me with Ben and May I would be dead in the plane crash with them. To me if we never saw the article then we'd think they'd still be out there.

Exactly.
 
Sally isn't named in the movie. She's credited as "Hot girl"

I'm actually a little disappointed about that. I wonder if there are more high school scenes, considering her role actually had a name with some familiarity.
 
Is there a scene of Gwen and Pete after they swing away together for the first time?
 
do you guys think his parents will come back in the second one? i know the article says they are dead, but there is still a possiblity!
 
The thing about the whole "untold story" plotline is that when that info leaked out, I remember it getting very bad responses. I can't see how sony execs wouldn't have liked Webb's film when this script was commisioned before they even hired him to direct and for all intents and purposes, is the script they wanted to film.

The changes probably happened for 2 reasons, they either got cold feet after that info leaked or they are saving that stuff for a sequel.
 
It's simple. Sony wanted to create a different origin for Spider-Man. Marc Webb created the concept of Peter being part of a ''bigger plan''. This information leaked. Fans hate change. Fans complained. Sony wanted the movie to be succesful. Sony got scared fans wouldn't watch it if they changed stuff. So they cut all the change.

And now fans are complaing it's ''too similar''.
 
It's simple. Sony wanted to create a different origin for Spider-Man. Marc Webb created the concept of Peter being part of a ''bigger plan''. This information leaked. Fans hate change. Fans complained. Sony wanted the movie to be succesful. Sony got scared fans wouldn't watch it if they changed stuff. So they cut all the change.

And now fans are complaing it's ''too similar''.

Exactly! if they change something is bad for the spiderman fans if they don´t is bad for the GA/Critics
 


Marc Webb talks briefly about deleted scenes in this interview. Looks like he is planning on only putting 4 or 5 on the DVD. Here's hoping for more though!

Great interview.
 
I can't go into the mind if someone abandoned but I don't think I would be mad at my father in that situation....cause if they didn't leave me with Ben and May I would be dead in the plane crash with them. To me if we never saw the article then we'd think they'd still be out there.
Despite Ben and May, he still feels that void, and maybe he could be feeling that it would've been better to be with his parents wherever they are, even if that means that he would've died with them. When you feel abandoned and then that person who you percieve to have abandoned you dies, you may very well feel that they had no right to die and leave you alone in such a definite manner. It's not rational, but not many things are when you've been emotionally scarred. I'm not totally speaking from personal experience so I could be wrong, but that's just how I see it.
 
Great interview, the interviewer asked some very good questions compared to many other interviewers.

Great answers from Marc Webb as well, I really like him. I did before with (500) Days of Summer but now I do it even more. He seems so down to earth but a genious of emotions at the same time! I also enjoyed seeing him with that huge beard haha!
 
Webb did a good job for what he was trying to do with peter parker and spiderman
 
It's not that it was too similar, audiences just didn't want another origin story again. That simple. Fans see the Raimi origin as close to perfect that was movie people loved and its still fresh in everyone's minds.

And having Peter's parents alter his DNA is ****ing stupid. In the Ultimate comics I think his father created the Venom sybmiote and I think that makes a little more sense, having Venom be a lab project rather than a sentient alien.
 
i hope they plan on editing those deleted scenes back into the film ala terminator 2, or lord of the rings.

deleted scenes that solely exist for dvd bonus material are worthless.
 
It's not that it was too similar, audiences just didn't want another origin story again. That simple. Fans see the Raimi origin as close to perfect that was movie people loved and its still fresh in everyone's minds.

And having Peter's parents alter his DNA is ****ing stupid. In the Ultimate comics I think his father created the Venom sybmiote and I think that makes a little more sense, having Venom be a lab project rather than a sentient alien.

You obviously haven't seen the film. It's never indicated that he altered Peter's DNA.
 
You obviously haven't seen the film. It's never indicated that he altered Peter's DNA.

To be fair to Vile, Oscorp, that is a common belief on these boards (apparently). People speculated that's what happened due to the marketing of the trailers and now people are speculating it was cut in face of the backlash. Plus in face of the parents storyline effectively dropping off for the most part in the movie it's understandable people may suspect parts of it were cut and why.
 
To be fair to Vile, Oscorp, that is a common belief on these boards (apparently). People speculated that's what happened due to the marketing of the trailers and now people are speculating it was cut in face of the backlash. Plus in face of the parents storyline effectively dropping off for the most part in the movie it's understandable people may suspect parts of it were cut and why.

Speculations doesn't matter since there's really, as I said, nothing in the film itself that indicates that Richard altered Peter's DNA. So Vile has either not seen the film, or he just wants to bash it for something that's not even there. In both cases, it's just stupid to make a comment like that.
 
Speculations doesn't matter since there's really, as I said, nothing in the film itself that indicates that Richard altered Peter's DNA. So Vile has either not seen the film, or he just wants to bash it for something that's not even there. In both cases, it's just stupid to make a comment like that.

Actually, I'm trying to get across that Vile's post doesn't necessarily indicate that he meant it was in the film. It could be read as merely a condemnation of the idea itself.
 
And I'm trying to get across that Vile's post doesn't necessarily indicate that he meant it was in the film. It could be read as merely a condemnation of the idea itself.

Ah I see, if that's the case then I'm sorry :)
 
Ah I see, if that's the case then I'm sorry :)

No need to apologise, dude. :yay:

Though I'd like to add that thinking about the possibility of this potential plot line raising its head in a sequel, though I may not like the idea myself, I think it could be made to work in a certain scenario.

I think if Richard Parker did experiment on Peter then it should be out of necessity to save his son's life. You could tie it in with the break through in the Decay Rate Algorithm and the notes left to Peter and why he was possibly killed (along with his wife) by Norman Osborn (or possibly his lackey).

Then that way you still retain the possibility of Peter's accident and getting spider powers still somewhat random and not fated, but at the same time it's influenced by whatever Dr. Parker may have done to save Peter.
 
- Gwen saying "What's next for Spider-Man?"
- Peter saying "Let me show you something my father had been working on." (I think...)
 
No need to apologise, dude. :yay:

Though I'd like to add that thinking about the possibility of this potential plot line raising its head in a sequel, though I may not like the idea myself, I think it could be made to work in a certain scenario.

I think if Richard Parker did experiment on Peter then it should be out of necessity to save his son's life. You could tie it in with the break through in the Decay Rate Algorithm and the notes left to Peter and why he was possibly killed (along with his wife) by Norman Osborn (or possibly his lackey).

Then that way you still retain the possibility of Peter's accident and getting spider powers still somewhat random and not fated, but at the same time it's influenced by whatever Dr. Parker may have done to save Peter.

Thanks! I must say that I've for a long time thought you're one of the good posters here that can discuss in a very grown up manner (something I lack sometimes here haha), and keep things interesting. You should have many creds for that! :up:

About the rest of your post, that's sounds very plausible actually! Would tie Peter to Norman without going the Harry angle. I'm not sure I'd really like the idea but maybe Webb could pull it off.
 
Thanks! I must say that I've for a long time thought you're one of the good posters here that can discuss in a very grown up manner (something I lack sometimes here haha), and keep things interesting. You should have many creds for that! :up:

About the rest of your post, that's sounds very plausible actually! Would tie Peter to Norman without going the Harry angle. I'm not sure I'd really like the idea but maybe Webb could pull it off.

Thanks. :up: You're one of the good regulars on the Spidey board.

Also, yeah I hope if it is introduced that it's handled well by Webb (if he comes back). Although there's good argument that they don't need to really go that route at all since there is essentially a void where it comes to Peter's parents in TASM and the sequel can really go anywhere with that at the moment.
 
I just saw a new commercial on TV and it had a new deleted scene at the end of it we hadn't seen before.

From the part where Spidey is calling Gwen to get out of Oscorp there was a part cut of Spidey next to some guy in a business suit and telling the guy "Can I use your phone can I use your phone?! *guy uses the phone* ...are you serious?"

Not sure why he couldn't use his own, maybe he didn't have it. It was pretty funny, though.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"