The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man General Discussion & Speculation Thread - - - - - Part 15

[Naked Shia]

I can understand that.

 

[awesome232]

That IMDb guy is full of crap! He missed some things that were shown in the trailers, which means he hasnt seen the film! I'm sure this film will be epic!

 

[Naked Shia]

That IMDb guy is full of crap! He missed some things that were shown in the trailers, which means he hasnt seen the film! I'm sure this film will be epic!

Impossible. This word can only be used to describe the dark knight rises. TAS should be outsawesome.

 

[DeathChill]

Sounds like that MysterioMan is doing the EXACT SAME THING AGAIN. Jesus people, don't believe reviews unless they come from critics or people here we know have seen the movie.

 

[SpideyFan92]

I know many people have already said this but why has he not mentioned anything about the mysterious man who was talking to dr Connors..how uncle Ben actually dies..
Webb also mentioned that there would be hints of future villians..he has not mentioned that either in his review and I don't think a marketing staff member would put the movie in such bad light...she also said that spiderman's shoes looked god aweful (such hate from a member who's supposed to be increasing the hype of the movie and trying to get us to watch the movie)..I call it bluff

and the lizard made 3 appearences?? He's trying to tell us that it's spiderman 3 all over again...

I think it's fake..another troll trying to lower the movie..

 

[Picard Sisko]

If this guy works for Sony, then he must be the lousiest employee I've ever heard of. What he said about

Spoiler

his last words "take care of gwen," isn't that being taken right out of the comic books? He is kind of an enemy in this movie, so why would he randomly become a spider-man supporter right before his death?

 

[SpideyFan92]

btw I think the pole bending will be a deleted scene
he even commented..."spidey's shoes were bad AT TIMES"..arent they the same shoes throughout the whole film...

I seriously can't take the internet seriously anymore

 

[Picard Sisko]

Are sony employees allowed to go write about their review online based off a test screening before the movie is released?

 

[SpideyFan92]

No I don't think Sony would allow that...

Straight redundency for those staff members who do it

 

[Picard Sisko]

Oh dear, look at this guy's comment!

I'd like to see them try.

We're men, we have opinions, just because it's not the same as yours doesn't make it less valid. More so perhaps...that's what I'm doing here, to answer your inane question.

I'll reiterate; Spider-Man 2 was an excellent movie, the best comic genre movie I've seen, and I'm not a Spider-Man comic book fan (I like X-Men, Swamp Thing, Batman, Fables, and Sandman amongst others). I have a hard time believing that this movie will be better than it or it's predecessor, in fact I know they won't top it by regurgitating an origin story done just 10 years before, and I think that the remake/reboot thing is a complete waste of time made by people who have no concept of story telling, they just understand that;

a.) Spider-Man has big name recognition
b.) Origin stories for comic book heroes do well and are easy to write and create because they all follow a very basic pattern
c.) Twilight has done very well in the teen market, despite being totally vapid, so the same can be done for Spider-Man if it makes some compromises. Namely; continuity, story depth, originality, and a true bildungsroman.
d.) All of which means money...big money.

So yeah, support it if you must but understand that this movie is a cookie-cutter film, stamped out of an assembly line like a pizza pocket in a manufacturing plant. It isn't a good story, it isn't art, and it isn't unique, it's just recycled fluff, watered down fluff. Beh, you can have it, enjoy your mush, who knows it might be decent despite it's obvious failings.

 

[Drummerdude7]

Obvious failings of poster are obvious.

 

[Abudefduf]

I have a hard time believing that this movie will be better than it or it's predecessor, in fact I know they won't top it by regurgitating an origin story done just 10 years before, and I think that the remake/reboot thing is a complete waste of time made by people who have no concept of story telling, they just understand that;

Ah that sounds intriguing, but on the other hand the dude who posted it obviously has no concept of Time, since he has seen a movie before the actual release.

 

[Drummerdude7]

Ah that sounds intriguing, but on the other hand the dude who posted it obviously has no concept of Time, since he has seen a movie before the actual release.

....haven't you ever heard of time travel?

 

[mayo23]

Wow, so did this guy really just compare ASM to Twilight?

I don't know what to say. I mean, he could be telling the truth, but really?

Can it really be that bad and that they've duped all of us?

But this guy said he wasn't a Spider-man fan to begin with....

 

[Drummerdude7]

Wow, so did this guy really just compare ASM to Twilight?

I don't know what to say. I mean, he could be telling the truth, but really?

Can it really be that bad and that they've duped all of us?

But this guy said he wasn't a Spider-man fan to begin with....

 

[Abudefduf]

I don't think it's the same person who claims he's seen the movie. Must be one of these smart people who haunt IMDB.

 

[NinjaCarm]

Any reviews of the film hit yet?

 

[NinjaCarm]

^ where are they? Are the positive? Negative?

 

[NinjaCarm]

 

[Drummerdude7]

^ where are they? Are the positive? Negative?

If they're fake, does it matter?

 

[NinjaCarm]

^ Curious to read and then decide the validity myself.

 

[Naite22]

^ go one page back. They're there... and they are absolute and utterly BS.

 

[SpideyFan92]

I don't think we should read any reviews or even make an attempt at finding reviews before June 28 (India release) July 3rd(UK USA) because that could seriously affect your idea about the film and you might go in thinking OMG this going to be bad..

there will always be losers downing a film because that's what they do..they're downers themselves and they're going to ruin the film for you...in my opinion we should wait tim_riggins' review and goran's review and others here going to an actual premiere/screening....

 

[Spiderdevil]

That IMDb guy is full of crap! He missed some things that were shown in the trailers, which means he hasnt seen the film! I'm sure this film will be epic!

He says the Lizard appears 3 times when it probably 4 times(Or more)

1.School
2.Bridge
3.Sewers
4.OSCORP tower
5.Inside some faculty when he is searching for Gwen and she is hiding

 

[Spiderdevil]

And its impossible that a sony employee would Bash the movie,totally impossible
Even if he doesnt like it he would still say it is decent just because it is made at the company where he works