@GremlinZilla89
That's so good to hear,now i'm even more excited to see the moviet:
Great Review![]()
:
That's it. Just seen my post where I had 'to' instead of 'from' for some reason.I think it was "I'll take something precious from you".

Therein lies my problem with Harry's motives. The suit healed him, then why was he still after Spider-Man's blood? I was very consfused. To me it seemed like Harry was now trying to complete his father's legacy than try to cure himself and get vegeance for Peter betraying him (especially finding out Peter is Spider-Man). He needed Spider-Man's blood to complete the serum that was suppose to heal him and his father. He was still awesome though.
After hearing all these different reviews I have to say I'm not in the least bit interested in watching this movie now. Growing up a Spider-Man fan they still haven't done this character justice after five movies apparently. Maguire stunk and I'm not fond of Garfield's hip contemporary Peter Parker portrayal and the absence of Uncle Ben???
Screw this franchise. How hard is it to give us a Peter Parker from the original comics with a positive outlook on life and is an actual man??? Like not in high school already??
The MTV Spider-Man was great because I thought Doogie Houser did a great job as Peter AND Spider-Man.
Reboot this reboot, please. They're just throwing all these villains at us now to keep us interested and to keep the rights and keep the cash flowing. Whatever.
Best Spider-Man movie ever? Yes, I would have to say so.
First off I would like to do away with the criticisms I simply don't agree with or think are overblown.
1: Too busy/too many plot threads: Mmmm, not for me. As much as I was anticipating this movie I did expect it to feel stuffed to a degree, but I honestly never once said to myself "Wow, that could have been done away with entirely." I felt all three main character stories were served adequately. I was actually surprised at how well executed Harry's story was and bought into his one film arc more than Franco's Harry over three films.
2: Too campy/silly/goofy/OTT/odd tonal shifts: In my opinion, the camp aspect is being HUGELY exaggerated by some people. I'm not saying they can't feel this way, but I was expecting some flight of fancy tone that never came. This is no more OTT or campy than the first two Raimi films. The difference is this film has the strong acting and snappy dialogue to carry the comic book nature that the Raimi films, imho of course, mostly lacked. The complaints of tonal shift don't ring true either. It doesn't bounce from light to dark to light to dark again like some reviews have implied. It gets serious and intense, but never so much that it clashes with the more whimsical nature of the rest of the film. It's funny when it needs to be, and serious when it needs to be.
I've heard people call Dillon/Electro the campiest, most OTT thing in the movie and I don't see how. He's an exaggeration, but a comic book exaggeration. He's a comic book whacko, not a "lets make this grounded for the hell of it" whacko. I thought he was awesome, especially his major power displays during the finale of the film.
And Dr. Kafka? Really people? THAT is what is getting your undies in a knot? He was BARELY in the film! Maybe, and I mean MAYBE 3 minutes total. Yet again, by the way some people have carried on you would think he's some major supporting role. He's just a mad scientist with a stereotypical European accents. That's it. Absolutely nothing more than that.
The one thing I can semi agree on is that the narrative is...loose. Not crammed, loose. But loose does not equal bad. It follows 3 plot points that merge into one by the end, slowly connecting the dots to offer us one hell of an exciting final battle. It's never confusing or rushed but I can see why people would want a less busy plot. If anything, the film is BETTER written than some are giving it credit for.
What truly makes this movie excel is, like many have already stated, is the sheer amount of heart and exuberance in the performances and the directing. You can really tell Webb was having fun here and wanted this film to resonate with audiences. He goes all out with the visuals. This IS the Spidey we've been needing on screen. If nothing else, you have to agree Spidey and his web-slinging and quipping is ripped from the panel. I found myself getting giddy watching him do his thing more than any other previous film in the franchise.
Garfield has cemented himself as THE Spidey for me (not that it was hard considering I mostly despise Maguire. Sorry, but I do) with wit, charm and charisma. You really get the sense Peter cares for people in this film, more so than any other entry so far. He was a true superhero. I adored the scene with the little kid and the bullies.
Stone shares an amazing spark with Garfield and there scene together are a huge highlight. I honestly can't think of a superhero film romance more natural and appealing than the one found in both of these movies. Only the Lois and Superman romance of the Donner films equal it. And this my friends, is the heart of the film. It's a love story and that is bold for a mega budget superhero franchise to do. Ya, I guess technically the Raimi films were love stories too, but for me they don't have one ounce, one iota of the chemistry that Garfield and Stone have. Ahh, I should stop myself there, I don't want this to turn into a Raimi bashing review. But for the record I still greatly enjoy the first film.
Overall, this is one of the most colorful, heartfelt, and enjoyable entries in the superhero genre lately. It wears it's heart on it's sleeve and bolsters wonderful comic booky action and playfulness while delivering characters we truly care about.
9/10
Hey Ultimate,did you liked the first one?
Yes. Despite the movie having some notable flaws, I enjoyed it. There was room for improvement however the positives outweighed the bad, imo. I give it about an 8/10.
t:After hearing all these different reviews I have to say I'm not in the least bit interested in watching this movie now. Growing up a Spider-Man fan they still haven't done this character justice after five movies apparently. Maguire stunk and I'm not fond of Garfield's hip contemporary Peter Parker portrayal and the absence of Uncle Ben???
Screw this franchise. How hard is it to give us a Peter Parker from the original comics with a positive outlook on life and is an actual man??? Like not in high school already??
The MTV Spider-Man was great because I thought Doogie Houser did a great job as Peter AND Spider-Man.
Reboot this reboot, please. They're just throwing all these villains at us now to keep us interested and to keep the rights and keep the cash flowing. Whatever.
![]()
I've been a Spidey fan since I was 8. My favorite superhero by miles and miles, I've seen every incarnation of Spider-Man except the Japenese and Italian version (and even these I've briefly seen on YouTube).
The order in which I put PP/S-M (Note; I am talking about Spider-Man/Peter ONLY not the quality of the show)
1. The comics (obviously)
Lee-Ditko/Stern-JRJR being my favorites.
2. Spectacular Spider-Man
3. ASM2
'THIS' is how highly I rate the rendition of PP/S-M
4. Spider-Man and his Amazing Friends
5. Spider-Man 90's cartoon
6. MTV Spider-Man
7. Ultimate Spider-Man
8. Raimi's Spider-Man
9. 60's cartoon (Spider-Man, does whatever a spider can)
10. Spider-Man Unlimited *shudder*
So stop worrying NinjaCarm, they knock Spidey AND Peter out of the park.

Wow, a big fan of Lee-Ditko, Stern-Romita Jr fan loving TASM2 makes me excited!![]()
This version of Spider-Man will blow you away. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but if anyone says they don't like this rendition of Peter/Spidey thenI don't know what they want from the character because they take the best elements of Peter (guilt, genius, charm, empathy) and the best elements of Spidey (quips, determination, speed, strength) and put those elements front and centre on the big screen.
I've been a Spidey fan since I was 8. My favorite superhero by miles and miles, I've seen every incarnation of Spider-Man except the Japenese and Italian version (and even these I've briefly seen on YouTube).
The order in which I put PP/S-M (Note; I am talking about Spider-Man/Peter ONLY not the quality of the show)
1. The comics (obviously)
Lee-Ditko/Stern-JRJR being my favorites.
2. Spectacular Spider-Man
3. ASM2
'THIS' is how highly I rate the rendition of PP/S-M
4. Spider-Man and his Amazing Friends
5. Spider-Man 90's cartoon
6. MTV Spider-Man
7. Ultimate Spider-Man
8. Raimi's Spider-Man
9. 60's cartoon (Spider-Man, does whatever a spider can)
10. Spider-Man Unlimited *shudder*
So stop worrying NinjaCarm, they knock Spidey AND Peter out of the park.
t:I thought in The Amazing Spider-Man the character was more well balanced. In The Amazing Spider-Man 2 spidey was a little over the top. I still liked him, but a lot of the stuff felt extremely forced and unnatural. They hired new writers, and maybe that´s why everything felt so different.
Dan Slott's Amazing Spider-Man #1
Are you talking about Peter or Spidey himself? If you are talking about Spidey, I thought the quips were hilarious and for me he is the best big screen rendition of Spidey by miles. Raimi's Spidey doesn't have a personality and as much as it pains me to say it (because I like the movie) ASM1 Spidey is a little unlikeable, especially when he starts laughing after webs the crook to the wall.
Wait? What? Without spoilers, what is this?

Neil, dude. How on Earth don't you know about that, man?
It's literally EVERYWHERE. Are you reading Superior Spider-Man in trades?

Stopped reading Superior when they killed 'ghost' Peter.
Will pick up Amazing #1. Thanks for the heads up![]()
Both Peter and Spidey felt more likeable to me in ASM1. They were more subtle in every way but still got the point across.
I thought spidey had some good moments in ASM2, but after a while i couldn´t help but think that they were trying way too hard to make Spidey as comical as possible, and frankly, not everything was funny.
One interesting thing:
I rewatched AMS1 right after ASM2 and was shocked by how much younger Andrew looked in that movie. I mean, it´s only two years between movies but he looks like a 20 yo in AMS1 and a 27/28 yo in AMS2.
Here's the cover of Amazing Spider-Man #1:
![]()
I'll say no more. *ninjaface*

Nice cover. Disappointing Ramos is the artist. Oh well, will still pick it up
When's it out?