I've always thought that part of Batman's disguise should be hiding his technology and resources. You shouldn't able to look at Batman and think "hm, probably rich".
A veneer of simplicity, or projecting that he's possibly supernatural. Nobody knows how he does what he does.
Really?
Because Keaton as Batman appeared supernatural, but then you have a guy driving around in a jet turbo armored vehicle, and has his own personalized bat shaped stealth jet LOL obviously he has funding and resources.
No **** that this is all subjective, but I was replying to somebody stating as absolute fact that Robert Pattinson suit is a better execution than the Chris Nolan one.
We haven’t even seen enough to determine anything like that, let alone how it looks and functions on the screen.
The jigsaw lower body on the dark knight suit to me isn’t a buzz kill the way it is for other people, never even found it to be that much of an aesthetic distraction either.
The lower body on TDK suit looks more streamlined and not like baggy cargo pants like the Robert Pattinson one.
It was also obviously moto cross inspired which tied into the usage of the Bat pod motorcycle.
There has been nothing shown that indicates the Pattinson suit has a better cape than Bale. Not a damn thing.
We literally haven’t seen anything about it, or its function, or its texture, or its weight, or if it’s a glider, or even it’s length.
Because the best capes so far was the leathery heavy ankle length one for Keaton that looked like actual bat wings in 89.
And then the Bale Cape.
Which billowed in the wind romantically and like the comic book. Had massive length, giving his Batman a more monstrous appearance and doubled as a glider giving Batman abilities on screen we’ve never seen before. Gliding in between real world distances between buildings.
