Im sorry but if you dont think TDK was helped by Heathes death then your crazy. Sure being a great movie is what gave it awesome long term sales. But generating origional buzz was helped by his death.
Except TDKR is the last movie of those listed movies to be released. People will have already seen The Avengers, Star Trek, Spiderman by the time TDKR is out.
Im sorry but if you dont think TDK was helped by Heathes death then your crazy. Sure being a great movie is what gave it awesome long term sales. But generating origional buzz was helped by his death.
Exactly. The average family will have been hit by a whole slew of high profile, high-expectation movies in the space of a couple of months. I wasn't suggesting that this will preclude anyone from seeing The Dark Knight; but what I'm saying is that *the average family/cinema goer* is unlikely to THEN going to go on to watch The Dark Knight repeatedly. Especially if the first few movies have the kind of appeal that encourages repeat viewing.
What I'm describing is, for the summer of 2012, there will be a culture of high-interest movies, all within the space a few months. You cannot expect that the entire breadth of the movie-going public (which is what The Dark Knight managed to reach out to) will show the same amount of (financial) commitment to 1 film, if across that whole space of time there are lots of other films that will be drawing their business (which is unlike what happened in summer 08 for TDK).
Suppose that the Avengers does somewhere close to a billion at the worldwide box office (not far-fetched considering Iron Man 2, a critically lukewarm movie, did 622 million on the interest generate by just 1 movie). Then suppose that The Amazing Spider-Man does as well as the first spider-man movie (again, close to a billion) - and that the Star Trek sequel increases its business on the first movie by 30% (another half a billion). Then if Men in Black does an equal box office performance to the last movie (400 million) - do you really expect the Dark Knight to knock it out of the park, and rake in another billion?
Maybe it will. Maybe it'll be the best year for movie box office of all time; all I'm suggesting is that, from the 2 year prospective, it doesn't look set for a 'perfect storm' unless all the movies mentioned above do unexpectedly badly. The studios for The Avengers, The Star Trek Sequel, and the Amazing Spider-man. Plus the Pirates movie - are ALL going to be looking for the perfect storm scenario. They can't all get it; and even if the Dark Knight sequel is the most likely out of all of them to do exceptional box office, it's very unlikely it'll be a 'perfect storm' - because the conditions just aren't the same as it was in 08.

I agree and I think people tend to forget that its not Iron Man, CA, Thor and Hulk, fans all coming together to see this movie. It is all the same fanbase, there will not be some magical jump for 317m to 500m. Assuming Thor or CA do not make 500m. Iron Man will most likely be the highest super hero in the avengers, so the gross will be around the same as Iron Man's gross.Avengers wont do that well, its hype has been going on for too long. its kind of annoying.
Completely random box office guess -
$420 million domestic
$400 million international
________________
$820 million total
SEE YOU NEXT YEAR!![]()

Exactly. The average family will have been hit by a whole slew of high profile, high-expectation movies in the space of a couple of months. I wasn't suggesting that this will preclude anyone from seeing The Dark Knight; but what I'm saying is that *the average family/cinema goer* is unlikely to THEN going to go on to watch The Dark Knight repeatedly. Especially if the first few movies have the kind of appeal that encourages repeat viewing.
What I'm describing is, for the summer of 2012, there will be a culture of high-interest movies, all within the space a few months. You cannot expect that the entire breadth of the movie-going public (which is what The Dark Knight managed to reach out to) will show the same amount of (financial) commitment to 1 film, if across that whole space of time there are lots of other films that will be drawing their business (which is unlike what happened in summer 08 for TDK).
Suppose that the Avengers does somewhere close to a billion at the worldwide box office (not far-fetched considering Iron Man 2, a critically lukewarm movie, did 622 million on the interest generate by just 1 movie). Then suppose that The Amazing Spider-Man does as well as the first spider-man movie (again, close to a billion) - and that the Star Trek sequel increases its business on the first movie by 30% (another half a billion). Then if Men in Black does an equal box office performance to the last movie (400 million) - do you really expect the Dark Knight to knock it out of the park, and rake in another billion?
Maybe it will. Maybe it'll be the best year for movie box office of all time; all I'm suggesting is that, from the 2 year prospective, it doesn't look set for a 'perfect storm' unless all the movies mentioned above do unexpectedly badly. The studios for The Avengers, The Star Trek Sequel, and the Amazing Spider-man. Plus the Pirates movie - are ALL going to be looking for the perfect storm scenario. They can't all get it; and even if the Dark Knight sequel is the most likely out of all of them to do exceptional box office, it's very unlikely it'll be a 'perfect storm' - because the conditions just aren't the same as it was in 08.
how is tdkr going to make less than inception?![]()
The first 3 are going to do HUGE business - (1 and 3 because they have to, Star Trek because it will be riding on a similar surprise cross-demographic-appeal to Batman Begins).
It's honestly too early to really say but I think that it will make less. The Joker is Batman's most popular villain and TDK had the perfect storm of good advertisement and free non-stop advertisement from CNN and MSNBC about Ledger's death.
I don't really give a f**k if somebody disagrees with me about the Ledger thing because I do think it helped the movie for the reasons mentioned above. It had nothing to do with Ledger being a B-lister before his death. The movie got tons of attention that it wouldn't have gotten if Ledger hadn't overdosed and made the whole thing a goulish James Dean style tragedy that everyone just had to see. I'm sure it still would have been a huge hit with him alive but a billion dollar film? Not a chance in hell.
Catwoman is a popular character and will give the movie alot of interest so Rises should be a hit but I don't see a billion dollars. 880 to 960mil maybe, because people loved TDK and 5 years of ticket price inflation. I would say it has no chance at a billion because that would be a risky bet to make when it has 5 years of ticket price inflation on it's side but I only give it a 50/50 shot. It should break the opening weekend record but it's going to be hella frontloaded.
Domestic: 455mil
International: 460mil
Total: 915mil.
Inception made $60 million more than TDK in international box office. TDKR's international take will probably be even less, and won't be buoyed by the insane domestic take of TDK.
Don't worry, that's still a lot of cheddar.

So much to say...must resist...TDKR will get a boast from Chinese release.. and i think if it isn't as glum as TDK.. it will do better in Japan (where TDK made 14 million and inception 40 million)... Japanese had issue with joker killing without reason and all that crap... they want their villian to be emo with feelings and cry about his actions and ****... Bane will probably appeal more to them as he is more Manga/Anime style than joker... plus Catwoman... they love women dressed as cats... lmao...
So much to say...must resist...
![]()
So much to say...must resist...
![]()