I think Titanic got to 240 mill. That is why he had to go to Paramount for the extra money. That is why it is a 20th Century Fox and Paramount Production.Michael Corleone said:Harry Potter was around 130 million dollars. I'm not sure if Returns is the most expensive, but it's certainly up there. I know Titanic was 200 million. All I've heard is 200 mill or more. Nothing concrete. It's certainly going to be ONE of the most expensive..but the most...who knows.
gdw said:That wasn't Singer who said that, but it was someone on the production.
As for Titanic, it was $200 mill, the same as Spider-man II, both currently hold the highest, produced, film budget.
It is the Goblet of Fire, the most recent Harry Potter movie that is rumoured to be in excess of $300 million.
i think Dougherty said so. one of the planet posters asked him the question.Excel said:it was me and according to imdb and austrailian newspaper,its budget is "limitless". hell some guy said he asked singer how much it was and he said "it changes...it keeps getting bigger" i believe it went.
well over 3 hours??? where did you get that?coast city said:the fact that it's going to be well over 3 hours could jack up the budget. as well, the kids can only work 4 hours a day. that means longer time on locations, studio, etc. don't know if that accounts for 300 mil, but it certainly elevates an already expensive movie.
Mentok said:Singer has only said "Its going to be as long as it has to be."
Mr. Freeze said:No it was rumored to be , but the actualy facts pointed it out not to be as much as it sounded to be
But what do i care the movie still sucked
fo sho... that movie blew..M.E.H.Z.E.B said:War of the Worlds was disappointing...
well over 3 hours??? where did you get that?
Mentok said:Potter wont be the most expensive film ever made... that was just marketing BS.
I believe adjusting for inflation CLEOPATRA is still the most expensive film ever made.
I heard somewhere that Singer said it was just over 2 hourssf2 said:well over 3 hours??? where did you get that?