• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

The Disney interference

I do have a problem with Disney interfering with Marvel comics and movies. I find the Tron covers and the ESBN covers to be a bit on the nose really.

I remember back when Marvel was independent they could reference just about anything. An arc of X-factor for example was called "Dirty Sexy Monet" (Dirty sexy money). I wonder if they would still be able to do that these days?

As far as we can tell, Disney hasn't actually done anything to interfere with Marvel Comics. They've used Marvel Comics' resources for other Disney properties, but nothing has changed within Marvel (other than them moving to a new office building, I think). I don't see some big wig from Disney marching down to Marvel's offices and telling Peter David that he can't reference a Disney-owned ABC show in one issue of his comic.
 
To a degree, it is similar to how Warner Brothers has always used DC. The WB, honestly, doesn't give a **** about what DC does in it's comics. I mean, they KILLED Bruce Wayne for a year or so. They have Dick Grayson as Batman now. Virtually every minority legacy hero has been killed or retired and re-replaced with their original mantle user. And of course, we still have no end of graphically violent stuff, as well as Arsenal and his dead cat. However, WB will utilize some DC talent for other projects, such as perhaps drawing for ads or whatnot, and use their comics to promote WB films. This doesn't hurt DC, as it nets them ad revenue. The WB also has several networks and uses DC for ore to create TV shows, whether animated or live action, which naturally sell commercial time, merchandise, and DVD's. You think WB/DC hasn't made a mint on "SMALLVILLE"? Why else has it lasted ten seasons? STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION didn't even last ten seasons.

Disney I see as using Marvel in the same way. Disney doesn't care about comics; they don't really publish comics in North America and have even trimmed back on magazines. If anything, Marvel have been MORE eager to stretch every name brand and franchise to their limit with 5,000 secondary, tertiary, and spin-off titles ever since the deal with Disney was announced last year. If Disney did care about comics, they might have told Marvel to knock it off with all the glut of Thor/Wolverine/Deadpool/Iron Man stuff by now, but they don't because they see it as promoting other things that Disney DOES care about. If an ad for TRON or TANGLED is in a comic that has a readership of even, say, 15,000 people (which is cancellation range), that still is 15,000 people who know about it, or are exposed to the ad.

Disney seems to care more about Marvel's film and TV slate. Much like with DC, the alliance with Disney gives Marvel network options, which before they never had (often having to go hat-in-hand to networks owned by competitors, like Cartoon Network or Kid's WB). Now, Marvel can air shows as they want on ABC or DISNEY XD and so on. Disney wants to see Marvel do more live action shows, since Disney has been making a killing on cheaply produced live action sitcoms for tweens for years. They also want to reap film revenue, which is why they paid Paramount $114 million for the distribution rights to "THE AVENGERS" in 2012 and the inevitable "IRON MAN 3" in 2013. And naturally any Marvel film after will be distributed by Disney or a company they own. Disney also reaps and makes cash with Marvel merch. I mean, when was the last time Mickey Mouse was in a cartoon? Almost never. But how much does his merchandise earn in a day? Likely millions, if not hundreds of millions, worldwide, every year. Comics are small fish to Disney, and to be honest they're smaller fish to Marvel; last time I looked at a profit diagram, only about 40% of Marvel's revenue these days comes from comics, and that may be a high estimate. The remaining 60+% comes from revenue from merchandise and other media.
 
Disney changes:
1) Mickey is now the sorceror supreme in the 616
2) Rescue Rangers is now part of the 52 initiative
3)Scrooge Mcduck is now bankrolling Shield
5)The Mighty Thor replaced by the Mighty Ducks
6)Stark International is now headquartered out of EPCOT Center
7)Peter Parker is now a Disney Prince
8)Dark Wing Duck replaces Moon Knight
9)Ultimate Duck Tales
10)The Incredibles move into the Baxter Building
 
They also want to reap film revenue, which is why they paid Paramount $114 million for the distribution rights to "THE AVENGERS" in 2012 and the inevitable "IRON MAN 3" in 2013.

Disney would still get over 90% of the film revenue from those films. They just wanted to slap the Walt Disney label on those films. And since they paid Paramount a minimum of $114 million, it's not like they're making any more money off of them either.

Think about it, Disney paid a minimum of $114 million just to have Disney/Marvel: Iron Man 3 as opposed to just Marvel Studios: Iron Man 3.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,960
Messages
22,042,965
Members
45,842
Latest member
JoeSoap
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"