spideyboy_1111
Young Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2001
- Messages
- 66,458
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 33
i'd rather they just announce that the marvel universe just simply ages slower, but time goes by faster.
i'd rather they just announce that the marvel universe just simply ages slower, but time goes by faster.
Things that would help the timeline concerns in the 616 Universe:
1. Stop tying characters to real-world wars and major events. Instead of saying a character was in `Nam or the Gulf War, make up a war that echoes the sentiment and ideals of the war you're aiming for. If the war didn't happen in the real world, then there's no specific date to attach to it.
2. Stop saying the date in the books. Any time a character makes reference to "2008" or "1999", they're putting themselves in a particular era, and that sort of thing will just have to be ignored or retconned later. Marvel time should never be mentioned out loud; Only inferred by the look and style.
3. Stop tying the books to a real-world President or celebrity for a quick buck. Yes, the Obama issue of Spider-Man sold a crapload, but now it establishes that what's happening is happening in 2009, with President Obama. In 15 years, when Peter Parker is supposed to be 15 years older and isn't, you'll still have this story of a late-20's Peter Parker/Spider-Man interacting with the newly-elected Obama, and that sets his age in stone. I know Marvel is all about "the Marvel Universe is just like OUR world" but really, it's not, and it's stupid to stick these known figures in there when they establish an exact year by their appearance. it would be better if the President and most famous people were fictional (Lila Cheney, Allison Blair, Norman Osborn, Senator Kelly, etc.) and thus aged the same way as Marvel Superheroes.
4. Stop referencing major real-world events. Tying the Marvel Superheroes to 9/11 was a bad decision, because it establishes that Spider-Man was in his late 20s on September 11, 2001. Instead of a specific real-world event, they should have written a fictional event that echoed the real-world one. It's especially a bad decision to use 9/11 because, in a world with superheroes, it's doubtful 9/11 would have happened in exactly the same way.
In short:
President Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, Obama = Bad for Marvel timeline
Anonymous or fictional President = Good for Marvel timeline
9/11, Pearl Harbor = Bad.
Stamford incident, Secret Invasion = Good.
The War in Viet Nam, Gulf War = Bad.
Secret Invasion, Latvian-Wakandan War = Good.
Stephen Colbert, 1970s KISS = Bad.
Lila Cheney, Alison Blair = Good.
Senator Joe McCarthy = Bad.
Senator Robert Kelly = Good.
At Times Square ball-drop: "Happy 2009!" = Bad.
At Times Square ball-drop: "Happy New Year!" = Good
It's pretty simple to disassociate fictional characters from a specific time... But Marvel doesn't seem to put any effort into it.
Lilandra cloned him a younger, healthier body, then transferred his mind into it (then he went and got crippled again). As it stands, Charles Xavier is still in his 70s, but has a younger body than he should.Xavier's body has probably been restored somehow as well, but if not, he did spend a while banging the queen of a super-advanced alien civilization. I'm sure they must have conquered aging to a greater degree than humans by now.
But why would you let what Marvel tells you bother you? I think we've had this discussion before, but I still don't understand why you can't just have your cake and eat it too.I personally see it that if marvel insist that the 60s/70s and 80s stories didn`t happen the way i read them and instead occured in the last 15 years then i want my 60s/70s and 80s eras back even if in retroactive form.
If I can`t have spidey gabbin` with Kennedy then I want retroactive 60s superhero gabbin` with kennedy in his place.
I actually would love that idea.
They should look up all the notorious panels which are now out of continuity because they feature marvel characters in 60s/70s/80s settings or talking to 60s/70s/80s presidents/personalities and swap the marvel characters for retroactive historical superheroes. So instead of the FF meeting the beatles you have some 60s retroactive superhero team. Instead of the avengers meeting Reagen you have retroactive 80s superheroes. So those moments sorta still happened but with retroactive heroes.
I know that might disrupt the old issues but these days marvel disavows all knowledge of any marvel characters meeting ex-presidents or the beatles so we might as well take what we can get.
But why would you let what Marvel tells you bother you? I think we've had this discussion before, but I still don't understand why you can't just have your cake and eat it too.
Magneto is tied to the Holocaust.I suppose there's no reason both Charles and Magneto can't be 55ish chronologically as Pietro and Wanda are probably mid 20's, and a lot of parents of 25ish yr olds are 53-55. Physically they could still be that age given their exercise level, but a couple clones and de-aging processes could've turned back the clock a few years to make them closer to 45 physically
It likely woulda been like Ex machina. No Way they could have stopped the first one, but they defiantly woulda stopped the second one.
Magneto is tied to the Holocaust.Bugger, yeah. Good point. Kind of the whole point of this thread huh. Difficult to tie Magneto to any other point in history as his time in the internment camps pretty much definied who he is now. Short of majorly changing his ethnicity, there's not a that can be done to 'slide' him through