Dark Raven
It's not about what you deserve...
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2010
- Messages
- 62,002
- Reaction score
- 9,675
- Points
- 103
We may be laughing at her soon as they get ready to abandon Shipp.
I really think people are looking at this from such a narrow lens. It takes a lot for folks to develop foresight and understand corporate hegemony. It's much more prevailing than people realize, hence people not giving a **** about the real-world implications of this deal since they get to see Wolverine in the Avengers one day.This is sarcasm right? Please tell me it is because if it isn't this is the problem. This is the stuff that brings down our freedoms. And not, "The government won't take away my right and freedom to conduct business." It's about creating accountability within that freedom. Look, I support competition and a free market in theory, however, it's not so free when it's not equal.
I'm not being hyperbolic here. It begins with the thought of, "Well it's not my problem... now leave me alone while I enjoy this thing that gives me joy." While these people take over our freedoms. They're not doing something like taking us to concentration camps, but that's the point. These people take over our lives in ways that we don't notice as much, only if we don't pay attention when in actuality, they're there. We can't control what conglomerates buy and don't buy, but that doesn't mean we can't take an active role in opposing it and being scared by it. Like this Net Neutrality repeal.
1984 had it right. These are deeper ideas. These things don't normally happen so out in the open. It's not on a street corner we can pick out and identify as proof with our eyes. It's the idea of it and the idea of it and not identifying it or seeing the problem and choosing not to acknowledge it is just as dangerous. It's the same type of thinking that leads to the bystander effect. It begins where we believe something won't happen. Then when it happens, it's still unbelievable and there's no way it can be that, it sounds like something in a story! And when it happens, it'll already be too late. Reality has far outstripped fiction. This is why critical thinking and skepticism of authority is so important.
I really think people are looking at this from such a narrow lens. It takes a lot for folks to develop foresight and understand corporate hegemony. It's much more prevailing than people realize, hence people not giving a **** about the real-world implications of this deal since they get to see Wolverine in the Avengers one day.![]()
Loose lips sink Shipps.![]()
I really think people are looking at this from such a narrow lens. It takes a lot for folks to develop foresight and understand corporate hegemony. It's much more prevailing than people realize, hence people not giving a **** about the real-world implications of this deal since they get to see Wolverine in the Avengers one day.![]()
We may be laughing at her soon as they get ready to abandon Shipp.
Loose lips sink Shipps.![]()
So for all those who didn't want the Disney-Fox merger and having all the characters back under one roof: on the flip side, would you have been okay if the X-Men were split up across different studios instead? Say some like Wolverine, Beast, Nightcrawler and others at Universal, Cyclops, Iceman, Storm and Shadowcat at Disney and Jean Grey, Angel, and Magneto at WB?
Of course it's a hypothetical situation, but it's demonstrating the point that having characters all over the place instead of under one roof is frustrating.
A lot of them wouldn't be made, in part because of not being able to put in other characters, but the more popular ones could be and could work pretty well.
I think the MCU now is a little too big and Way too crossover-y so more crossovers seem a negative. And the X-Men arguably work better/make more sense on their own, without other heroes with powers being popular and generally ignoring or fighting them.
Slight difference.Lol she thinks just cause shes contracted for more films that shes not going anywhere. She should phone up Terrance Howard and Edward Norton...
Yeah there's no way that Feige doesn't reboot the X-Men.
Recast in another Marvel role (Sue StormWhat if Iger and Horn want Lawrence to stay on as Mystique? She is one of the biggest stars in town.
What if Iger and Horn want Lawrence to stay on as Mystique? She is one of the biggest stars in town.
I agree, but for example, when EON rebooted James Bond, they kept Judi Dench as M. Even though it was a new franchise and a new Bond. New universe basically. You can't even go the codename route because Craig's character, his real name is Bond.I don't want her to become the star of the MCU as well and Mystique one of the main characters. It's not doing the X-Men the right way but just importing all the problems from Fox to a new owner.