MadVillainy
C'mon Son
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2008
- Messages
- 32,733
- Reaction score
- 9,402
- Points
- 103
I've been saying it for years. The release date is irrelevant if the movie is good. About bloody time hollywood caught on.
Truth.
I've been saying it for years. The release date is irrelevant if the movie is good. About bloody time hollywood caught on.
I've been doing a little digging, and jmc is absolutely correct. Back when movies were still a novelty and had to be seen in theaters (1910-1970), the release date was irrelevant.
I don't know why studios changed their minds, but glad they're embracing it again.
The blockbuster movie season is officially dead after this weekend with Deadpool. Good riddance.
January is actually the dumping ground. September is the month where they drop the stuff that wasn't quite good enough for blockbuster season but not good enough for the holiday season either.
January is actually the dumping ground. September is the month where they drop the stuff that wasn't quite good enough for blockbuster season but not good enough for the holiday season either.
I think studios are testing October as a potential ground for blockbusters now, what with Gravity and The Martian doing phenomenally well. WB originally had Aquaman slated for October 2018 before they saw a Christmas opportunity, and moved it there. Then Sony dated Venom for the spot Aquaman just vacated.
And Blade Runner 2049 is the ultimate October wild card this year. The fact the studios moved it up from January 2018 shows they have confidence in it.