- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Messages
- 40,446
- Reaction score
- 6,222
- Points
- 103
The mixture of bringing Duvall back and finding at least a passable actress for Mary would've improved Part III tenfold.
Well maybe not tenfold, but still a whole lot...
I actually don't mind Part III all that much, and I think it might have been close to the greatness of the first two if Robert Duvall had come back and if they cast someone else as Mary Corleone.
I think what makes III not as good is Sofia's acting. It really was horrible , but overall i liked Michael's story in this one, and of course it has a quote i adore: "Just when i thought i was out they pull me back in!". I still like this one.
Choosing between Godfather I and II is almost impossible for me, because i really think they're both masterpieces and i adore them. I'll have to go with I, but only by a hair; II is very close behind.
I liked III too. I really liked Vincent's story arc and how Michael was teaching him. Trying to shape him into a great leader of the family, but also to be a better man than he was.
Agreed with all of this.
The opera scene was pretty great though. Well staged.
I forgot Coppola was broke on the first. But did he do the first mainly because he loved the material or it was strictly because he needed the money?
There's so much about Part II I love. I love that birthday scene with the old cast back. It's eerie and nostalgic at the same time. How it ends with Michael alone at the table is fantastic.