A good tache is much harder to replicate than a sweater. :PRemember when everyone got horny for cable knit sweaters because Evans wore one in Knives Out?
I pray that same thing doesn’t happen for this film with creeper mustaches.
I have not noticed that at all. On here, Reddit, and Twitter (although I don't go on Twitter much)I know it’s become a cool thing to **** on the Russo Brothers lately, but TWS, Civil War, Infinity War and Endgame are awesome action movies. I think they’ll do fine here if they came up with a good script.
I have not noticed that at all. On here, Reddit, and Twitter (although I don't go on Twitter much)
Really? I’ve seen a lot of posts in the Superhero Civil War thread lately talking about how Endgame and IW sucked. Maybe it’s only a few people and it seems like a lot though, I’m not sure.
I would say Netflix worries me more than Russo Bros. Not that I'm worried about the movie at allThe Russos have struggled outside of Marvel thats why. I really liked Extraction, even though they technically didnt direct it.
I would say Netflix worries me more than Russo Bros. Not that I'm worried about the movie at all
Netflix keeps giving carte blanche to directors and I feel a lot of directors have done their worst work with Netflix. Especially when it comes to big budget movies. I think it's the fact they don't give any votes
Scott Weinberg had a good tweet about it but he took it down. He said that while he was watching 6 Underground (namely the opening car chase) that maybe studio interference is a good thing. Because even as obnoxious as Bay can be, that 6 Underground scene is a different level of obnoxious. Jordan Vogt Roberts (director of Kong Skull Island) replied to Weinberg "Welcome to the gray area." And even before that tweet I always felt it was a gray areaThat is true, isnt it? You know even though we often complain about studios interfering with directors' visions but...maybe this shows that there really something to be said about studio oversight sometimes.
Scott Weinberg had a good tweet about it but he took it down. He said that while he was watching 6 Underground (namely the opening car chase) that maybe studio interference is a good thing. Because even as obnoxious as Bay can be, that 6 Underground scene is a different level of obnoxious. Jordan Vogt Roberts (director of Kong Skull Island) replied to Weinberg "Welcome to the gray area." And even before that tweet I always felt it was a gray area
Filmmakers aren't these infallible people who will never do anything wrong. Like any job sometimes they'll need oversight or someone proofreading their work. There are countless times studio interference helped a movie. We just don't hear about it often because the headline of "Studio exec saves movie" isn't as grabby.
Idk why but fanboys have this image of studio execs of a bunch of guys rubbing their hands and laughing about how they're going to screw over a movie. And that filmmaker is always in the right. When that's not the case a vast majority of the time.
Filmmaking is a collaborative process. And that include the execs
I will say one correction. Fans, including me, think we know how the cake is baked. It's just Monday morning QBing that we do on here.I think nowadays because we as fans/ movie viewers are so privy to how the cake is baked because of the internet and social media and behind the scenes leaks we throw our hands up when we hear the studio "meddled" with a director's film.
Scott Weinberg had a good tweet about it but he took it down. He said that while he was watching 6 Underground (namely the opening car chase) that maybe studio interference is a good thing. Because even as obnoxious as Bay can be, that 6 Underground scene is a different level of obnoxious. Jordan Vogt Roberts (director of Kong Skull Island) replied to Weinberg "Welcome to the gray area." And even before that tweet I always felt it was a gray area
Filmmakers aren't these infallible people who will never do anything wrong. Like any job sometimes they'll need oversight or someone proofreading their work. There are countless times studio interference helped a movie. We just don't hear about it often because the headline of "Studio exec saves movie" isn't as grabby.
Idk why but fanboys have this image of studio execs of a bunch of guys rubbing their hands and laughing about how they're going to screw over a movie. And that filmmaker is always in the right. When that's not the case a vast majority of the time.
Filmmaking is a collaborative process. And that include the execs