
Interesting and heady stuff, raybia. I'd never heard this theorem before, but I'm definitely going to have to read more. If you think about it, Teilhard is basically predicting Skynet; all the world's AI essentially coming online with it's own collective self-awareness.
jag

2012 is when the party starts...i guess

Concerning Skynet, perhaps that is where Cameron got the idea.
this it the thread I've been waiting for
Thanks. I really find this concept fascinating.
I, personally feel that this day is coming but sometimes I look at some of the people around me and still think we're a bit far off . . .
however, the notion that people are more open to excepting the idea of collective consciousness is apparent . . . just that it might occur like a smack in the face for most dumb asses . . .

so you're saying for this people have to be smart and self aware? I recently heard a story about a woman throwing a WWE John Cena box set at a Best Buy clerk for telling her it was 4 to a customer when she was trying to buy 7. So I'm gonna go with, no, and at this rate we'll probably never get there.
Seriously, if you look at history, human conciousness and the level of how smart people seem to be is all cyclical. We get smart, we get dumb, rinse, repeat. I think we've had our time with the smart people, and are slowly headed back to another dark ages of anti-science, pro-religion to the point of insanity times. As proof, just look at anyone who's against stem-cell research. It could save millions of lives, and these abortions are happening anyway, but yet these people still would rather just toss these fetuses away then make it into something constructive.
But yeah, there's now way we're headed for anything but a fall![]()
Interesting however I don't believe that the Earth will be physically destroyed anytime soon. When it is destroyed mankind will have been long gone from the face of it.
However I do believe some future event will have life altering ramifications on mankind's potential and destiny. Now whether it happens in 2012, well I doubt it
but the Mayan theory is definitely interesting.
You aren't really going out on a limb with a prediction like that, it's like saying 'In the future something big will happen, I guarantee it!', as those things happen all the time.
How ironic that this article kind of relates to the subconsciouss or intuitive nature of the direction we're heaing, only in simpler terms:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/71514/page/1
Well we live in a period where mankind has never been as technological advanced as we are now even though we don't always use our knowledge for good.
Maybe mankind can still move towards a collective consciousness in spite of our immorality. Maybe the continued growth and advancement of our intellect
will eventually determine advancement of our ethics.
And the Romans were at the height of technology too, before the fall into the dark ages...all it takes is incompetent leaders, a public too scared or stupid or both to know what's right, religion influencing daily things (look at the thread about the Reverend in SD wanting to rename Hooker street to something less offensive for a good example of this), and apathy among the masses. We've got all of those in spades right now.
Those are good points and I agree with you.
Tell me though, what came right after the dark ages?

ah, but the religous crazies in the dark ages didnt have nuclear weapons![]()