The Halo 3 Discussion Thread!

HUMAN

Sidekick
Joined
Dec 19, 2001
Messages
3,220
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Halo 3 is the third game in the Halo Trilogy and will provide the thrilling conclusion to the events begun in Halo: Combat Evolved. Halo 3 was first revealed at the Electronic Entertainment Expo in Los Angeles on May 6th, 2006. Halo 3 will be available for Xbox 360 in 2007.

Halo 3 will pick up where Halo 2 left off. The Master Chief is returning to Earth to finish the fight. The Covenant occupation of Earth has uncovered a massive and ancient object beneath the African sands - an object who's secrets have yet to be revealed. Earth's forces are battered and beaten.

The Master Chief's AI companion Cortana is still trapped in the clutches of the Gravemind - a horrifying Flood intelligence, and a civil war is raging in the heart of the Covenant. This is how the world ends...


So...

Is it the civil war within the Covenant that's going to make the world end? Is it the Forerunner artifact that's gonna cause the destruction of our home world? Just what is THIS?

I'm glad to see the assault rifle back.

"I have defied gods and demons." (Gravemind/Cortana)

"I am your shield; I am your sword."

"I know you; your past, your future"

"This is the way the world ends."

180px-H3_e32006_storyboard02_cortana.jpg
 
No one else noticed that in the second game you can hear Cortana say that the Covenant were surpised to find humans on earth. They hinted a few times that they came to earth not for the reason of killing humans, but to find the "Arch". Am I the only one that caught that in the second game?
 
This is probaly a stupid question, but do they show you mc face in HALO 2. I haven't beaten it yet i have only beaten HALO 1
 
If Bungie doesn't put the MA5B in the game after that E3 trailer I am going to kill billions.
 
I'll give this game a chance if...

A) It's not infinitely overrated like the prequels.
B) They have the Halo 1 handgun.
C) Get rid of the stupid alien weapons except the carbine.
D) Have more enemies besides silly aliens.
 
I'll be happy if the story isn't as rehashed as Halo 2. But judging from the Halo 3 trailer,I can rest easy. :o
 
DACMAN said:
No one else noticed that in the second game you can hear Cortana say that the Covenant were surpised to find humans on earth. They hinted a few times that they came to earth not for the reason of killing humans, but to find the "Arch". Am I the only one that caught that in the second game?

Yup, I think when people started hearing that is when the theory that the Forerunners are some ancient race of humanity started up.
 
Sabretooth said:
I'll be happy if the story isn't as rehashed as Halo 2. But judging from the Halo 3 trailer,I can rest easy. :o

Rehashed? :confused:

Halo wouldn't be Halo without some appearance of a Halo.
 
Its the "Ark" it's not Arch.

I guess cause the Forerunner if they were early humans than they must have hid in it to protect themesleves from the igniting halo's so that they could protect themselves why they kill the flood.

Well there might be a halo prequel game called Forerunner or something. or maybe sequel or something.

HALO 3 DEAD?
BUNGIE'S NEXT PROJECT: FORERUNNER

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it true there will be no Halo 3? If you ask Bungie or Microsoft, the current answer will be, "Yes." In fact, at the time of this writing, both companies have flat-out denied that Halo 3 even exists. And yet the game has not only been the constant subject of talk and rumors by both fans and the industry itself, online retailers have thrown up bogus release dates from time to time to stir up the masses. How can a game that supposedly does not exist be speculated about so much? We know that Bungie is working on various projects, and despite employment advertisements asking that applicants love "combat on the high seas," Game Informer has learned through its network of industry spy pirates that Bungie's next release will be a Halo Xbox 360 project. However, as of now, it's not even called Halo 3.
The relentless confusion over Halo 3 starts with the powers that be at Bungie. Shortly after the release of Halo 2, the company's studio manager Pete Parsons told the BBC, "After Halo 2 we are planning to do something different. We will do something else and we have a few ideas." This led the public to the logical conclusion that the next project wouldn't be Halo-related. None other than Microsoft's Bill Gates himself put down the gauntlet on Halo 3 and seemingly confirmed the game's existence in the spring of 2005 when he told Time that the game would release alongside and compete with Sony's PlayStation 3. Gates would later recant this exact release date of the game, but didn't deny the project existed. That job has instead been left to others such as Microsoft Game Studios head Shane Kim who dubbed the game “the mythical Halo 3” in a February update of the website Next Generation. And, of course, all the while Bungie has held the course that Halo 3 does not exist.
In its customarily clever way, Bungie is not telling a lie – it’s just not telling you the whole truth. A well-connected Game Informer source has seen this game up and running, and tells us that the project is dubbed Forerunner (and no, this is not an April Fool’s joke). At this time the game is not being called Halo 3, which is perhaps how Bungie has been able to deny the existence of a title that literally bears the name “Halo 3”. Of course, when all is said in done, the game could be officially dubbed Halo 3: Forerunner or some variation thereof. It is very common for a game in development to be tagged with a temporary codename. For the time being, however, our source tells us that it’s being referred to simply as Forerunner. We contacted Microsoft about the game, but it would not comment on “rumor or speculation.”
The game is being designed around huge persistent worlds that will be created with what we’re being told is a modified Halo 2 engine. “Big” is the operative word, and many aspects of the title will be affected by the large scale of the game. For instance, Forerunner will showcase four-player co-op in a move away from a strict linear single-player experience. Make no mistake about it, though, Master Chief is in the game, and gamers will play as him to drive along the story. However, the world itself and the events that draw from it will be more malleable to the player and any co-op friends that join in on the action.
If you are charged to capture a weapons depot, for instance, you might not choose to do it, or may fail trying. Although our source says the game still has a definite mission structure, your failure at this particular task will mean that whatever extra firepower may have been yours for the taking had you captured the depot will instead strengthen your enemies from then on. This cause/effect concept applies to the game’s destructible environments as well. Of course, this philosophy is nothing new in video games, but it clearly embraces Bungie’s love of multiplayer and the lessons learned from the series’ success online. We imagine that these tidbits are surely only the tip of an iceberg that hopefully includes plans to merge the offline and online worlds together to great effect.
We’re told the game’s storyline will delve into the origins of the Forerunners, the long-absent, technologically advanced civilization that inspired the Covenant’s Great Journey. Up to this point, the Forerunners are a mysterious element within the Halo story that has yet to be fully explained. However, the plots of Halo and Halo 2 imply that humans, the Master Chief, and the Forerunners are linked, but with as little we know about the actual plot of this upcoming project, we don’t know how everything is going to fit together. Although our source has seen the Chief in action, even his presence could be half the truth. After all, this is from the company that surprised everyone with the introduction of the Arbiter as a playable character in Halo 2.
Bungie’s denials that Halo 3 exists have led fans to surmise that the company says so simply because the next Halo project doesn’t involve an actual halo, unlike the first two titles. That would make sense, given what our source has told us regarding the game’s focus on the Forerunners. However, that does not preclude the title from picking up where Halo 2 tantalizingly ended – with the Master Chief returning to Earth with a mandate to kick some ass.
The project could also be aligned with the Halo movie scheduled for release in the summer of 2007, which has Peter Jackson at the helm as executive producer. Our source tells us that the film will be based on the book Halo: The Fall of Reach, chronicling a time leading up to the first game. If the mysterious Forerunner project is in fact related to the movie, then perhaps the video game’s title could not only refer to the civilization, but to the game being a prequel set during the early part of humanity’s war with the Covenant.
Clearly there are more questions remaining that have been answered with the information we’ve brought to light. Does this Forerunner project actually mean that there won’t be a legitimate Halo 3? Could there be a game called Forerunner and an entirely other project entitled Halo 3? What if Forerunner is simply a side project meant to explore storyline tangents within the Halo universe? If “Forerunner” is indeed the actual name of the game our source has seen, and not simply a temporary codename, we can’t imagine a Halo product leaving Bungie’s doors without a Microsoft marketing executive slapping the word “Halo” somewhere on the box for maximum effect.
As always in the development process, there are myriad aspects that can change at any moment. But for the time being, our source has assured as that the tantalizing snippets that have come our way are indeed true. Whether or not they point to the whole truth is something we won’t know until Microsoft pulls back the curtain on the project at E3. Bungie clearly delights in winding up the public, so we wouldn’t at all be surprised if what we know now are merely isolated pieces of a larger puzzle that Bungie has cleverly constructed. Regardless, any project from the developer is a big deal and one that’s guaranteed to get fans excited, regardless of what it’s finally called.

- This article was taken from page 18 of the April 2006, issue 156 of “Game Informer” –
 
Am I the only one who thinks that the Halo franchise is extremely overated? Don't get me wrong I loved playing Halo 2 online but that was about it. The single player was boring and very repetative, and the story sucked ass. I don't think Halo comes even close to classics like Doom or Half-Life, or even Goldeneye.
 
Halo 2 is so much better than Half-Life(1) and Doom, wtf are you talking about?
 
The Halo franchise was and still is the only respectable console FPS series. All these "overrated" comments are as asinine as they are baseless and insubstantial. And Halo 2 had a great (albeit incomplete) story. The only reason it gets such a knee-jerk reaction from many gamers because it didn't give them a BJ that would blow away their roofs with orgasmic ecstasy. Just play it again (without any preconcieved notions this time) and you'll see that Halo 2 has some of the finest writing you've ever seen in a videogame.

Oh and Halo 3 will own each and every other game that dares show up anywhere near it's release calendar. :up:
 
Starship Troopers sucked anyway. :down::o
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,164
Messages
21,908,493
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"