The Illuminati/Anunnaki power structure.

So?

  • I am willing to consider the possibility.

  • That's stupid! You're insane!

  • I don't know what to think.


Results are only viewable after voting.
If you seriously believed in all of this bull****, why don't you actually do something to stop it instead of sitting in front of a computer monitor all day?
 
Pksoze said:
And yes we're in a planet governed by superstion there are more people like you than me in this world and that is depressing to me.

Yeah, you don't have blind faith in anything, yet you obviously believe that you are right and that I am wrong. Way to go. :up:
 
TheSumOfGod said:
Apparently, this is how they colonize a planet and it's population: by slow and gradual infiltration, and by changing OUR mentality into THEIR mentality, using religion for example. And there were only 9 of them sent to Earth at the beginning, it's a very economic and patient invasion process, which is probably happening simultaneously on thousands of other planets as well.

In your opinion, is EVERY religion on Earth a product of their creation?

If not, name the ones (if any) you believe is outside of the Anunnaki creation and possibility a religion revealed through a Supreme Creator.
 
TheSumOfGod said:
Yeah, you don't have blind faith in anything, yet you obviously believe that you are right and that I am wrong. Way to go. :up:


I never even said that I find your claims ludicrous, yet I'm open to it if you can provide something called evidence.
 
TheSumOfGod said:
When it was first proposed that the Earth was round, there was practically no hard evidence to speak of, no evidence that the public and the authorities of the time would have understood or even have considered, for that matter. It took a lot of people being burned to the stake before people's minds began to change...
No thats incorrect. The earth being round came from the evidence of observing star patterns in the night sky


We do know that Eratosthenes of Cyrene was the first to accurately estimate the Earth's diameter, around 220 BC. How he did it is detailed at Astronomy Online.
What he did was use the information that, at noon on the Summer Solstice, the sun shone to the bottom of a well in Syene (now called Aswan), Egypt. This meant that the sun was making a 90° angle to the ground on that day, in Syene.
Eratosthenes then measured the angle of sunlight to the ground in Alexandria, Egypt, at noon on the same day. He used that angle to calculate what fraction of the Earth's circumference (which is 360°) was between Alexandria and Syene. Since he knew the distance to Syene, and that it was exactly south of Alexandria, he was able to calculate the Earth's circumference.
Actually, he didn't have the distance quite right--and Syene isn't exactly south of Alexandria, either.
This was the first reasonable accurate measurement of the Earth's circumference, and it came to about 40,000 km (25,000 miles). We now know that this is an overestimate, but not by too much
 
cass said:
If you seriously believed in all of this bull****, why don't you actually do something to stop it instead of sitting in front of a computer monitor all day?

no one said they believe it, i don't think. we are just discussing it.
 
photojones2 said:
no one said they believe it, i don't think. we are just discussing it.

From his persistant posting of various theories revolving around "The Anunnaki", Sum obviously does.
 
photojones2 said:
that would go along with the theoretical reports of world leaders (past and current) as shifting into lizard people and eating children. most of those stories deal with third world children. i guess because they won't be missed as much? :(

Eating third world children is stupid... All bones and no meat.
 
Why so many. Why not group every one into one easier religion. That was the philosophy of the Ancient Romans. People are easier to control when they beileve in the same things.

Also if they created the religions. Is it possible that some miracles and works of god in the bible were actually done by reptilian technology as a way to influence them. "Just asking Im an atheist and don't believe any of the bible stories as fact."

Also you said Kennedy was killed in a coup d etat. Are there any other famous people (leaders, celebrites etc.) in the last 30 years that have been killed by the Illuminatti.
 
D.Rex said:
Are there any other famous people (leaders, celebrites etc.) in the last 30 years that have been killed by the Illuminatti.

TuPac.
 
Mentok said:
well, most current life forms (complex) have no pinpointed link between them and a distant ancestor. There is nothing unique about humans not yet having the 'missing link'.

I disagree . . . do you believe in the theory of evolution?
 
cass said:
From his persistant posting of various theories revolving around "The Anunnaki", Sum obviously does.

like i said. discussing it. go away.
 
photojones2 said:
like i said. discussing it. go away.

Um, no. Why don't you go find Thor and ask him to come back to comics?
 
DV8 said:
I disagree . . . do you believe in the theory of evolution?

Why do you disagree? Its a fact. Most current (complex) life forms lack an exact 'Missing Link' between them and a distant ancestor.
 
Mentok said:
They should be eating the fat people of the world :up:

yeah. i would start with rush. then maybe move over to star jones. i've never had a black chick, but i hear there's no going back.
 
Mentok said:
Why do you disagree? Its a fact. Most current (complex) life forms lack an exact 'Missing Link' between them and a distant ancestor.

well . . . millions of years ago, okay . . . there were dinosaurs, and some mammals . . . even though today these mammals are very different than they were then, a squirrel is still a squirrel; a crocodile is still a crocodile; a wolly mammoth is close enough to an elephant.

But an ape to a person . . . . it just doesn't make sense to me. Why wouldn't some other type of mammal have evolved into an intelligent lifeform similar to that of humans? We're just an anomaly in regards to every other form of nature.

I don't want to argue the wrong point here, that's all . . . . I agree that there are no specific 'missing links' pinpointed to evolution . . . I believe that evolution is a sluggish, gradual process, and that it's simply unbelievable that man has evolved in such a way from ape; or that we we appeared out of thin air as the bible states . . .
 
DV8 said:
well . . . millions of years ago, okay . . . there were dinosaurs, and some mammals . . . even though today these mammals are very different than they were then, a squirrel is still a squirrel; a crocodile is still a crocodile; a wolly mammoth is close enough to an elephant.

Ok, Crocodiles have remained virtually unchanged. Evolution has not occured nearly as much because they have not needed to change. Same goes for alot of other animals... Sharks come to mind.

Squirrels are relative newer Mammals.

The Wooly Mamoth is actually quite different to todays Elephant species (but I understand what you are getting to)

But an ape to a person . . . . it just doesn't make sense to me. Why wouldn't some other type of mammal have evolved into an intelligent lifeform similar to that of humans? We're just an anomaly in regards to every other form of nature.

The ape family (I dont like calling it the ape family since we technically didnt evolve from apes, rather along apes) was far less diverse (than some other mammals) with only a handful of species over the past few million years. We are the most intelligent life form because evolution was on our sides. While other lines followed different paths we followed the one that led us to be the most intelligent life forms.

Its not an anomaly at all, todays apes are a good representation of evolutionary processes.


I don't want to argue the wrong point here, that's all . . . . I agree that there are no specific 'missing links' pinpointed to evolution . . . I believe that evolution is a sluggish, gradual process, and that it's simply unbelievable that man has evolved in such a way from ape; or that we we appeared out of thin air as the bible states . . .

Thats cool, that was the point of my post anyway :up:
 
DV8 said:
well . . . millions of years ago, okay . . . there were dinosaurs, and some mammals . . . even though today these mammals are very different than they were then, a squirrel is still a squirrel; a crocodile is still a crocodile; a wolly mammoth is close enough to an elephant.

But an ape to a person . . . . it just doesn't make sense to me. Why wouldn't some other type of mammal have evolved into an intelligent lifeform similar to that of humans? We're just an anomaly in regards to every other form of nature.

I don't want to argue the wrong point here, that's all . . . . I agree that there are no specific 'missing links' pinpointed to evolution . . . I believe that evolution is a sluggish, gradual process, and that it's simply unbelievable that man has evolved in such a way from ape; or that we we appeared out of thin air as the bible states . . .


But the fact of the matter is that human beings exist and there had to be a starting point. Very facinating but unfortunately we will probably never know our true origins. (My theory is that we were from an advanced civilization and we f**ed Mars due to global warming and the few that survived colonized Earth. No place to go after we screw up this planet.)
 
Eh, it's a little too out there for me to believe just yet. Still interesting though.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,080,463
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"