He said the Joker's scars were made by his father. Is that right because he said it?
You miss the point.
The man critizised Kickass based on his personal moral views, and indirectly critizises those who liked the movie (or found it satisfyingly faithful). Give me a break.
Yeah but some of you are saying he said things that he did not say.
And he's gotten old, give him a break. It's not like I think he is infallible lol, there are many many reviews of his that I disagree with. He thought Burton's Batman movies were just okay...I can agree with some of his points on B'89 but he completely missed out on the masterful poetry of Batman Returns.
But hey, I'm sure you and Ebert both agree on how bad Schumacher's films are and the usage of Robin![]()
Ebert loved Spider-Man 2 and TDK.
He has my respect as far as his taste in comic book movies go.
He also has stated he doesn't like Mark Hamill's Joker voice.
http://www.worldsfinestonline.com/WF/batman/motpanniv/backstage/siskelebert.php
So he's not all that wonderful
That was Siskel, and not Ebert who said that.He also has stated he doesn't like Mark Hamill's Joker voice.
http://www.worldsfinestonline.com/WF/batman/motpanniv/backstage/siskelebert.php
So he's not all that wonderful
Siskel: There's more, including The Joker who frankly was better when Jack Nicholson played him in the first movie or Caesar Romero in the cartoon show on TV. I don't like this Joker's voice.
If you want to be technical, the Joker's origin explained in the Killing Joke was verified by Batman in Detective Comics 168 although it's not part of the current continuity. However in Batman Under the Hood (not the movie) the Joker revealed he used the Red Hood identity in the past, which is linked to the origin provided in the Killing Joke and Batman 168. I guess the beauty of it is.... it is however you'd like to look at it.
Is that your blog man? I have to say it's FANTASTIC.![]()
I study psychology, so getting into a character's mind is one of my specialities.
BUT JOKER! Good God, disturbing.
To me for this movie, in what I can understand.
Joker was a philosophical man. The type who would relentlessly think about the meaning of life, trying understand the purpose of why we are here. What is the point of life? I think he was and is suicidal. Finding no other meaning to life other than to cause mayhem, because to him, rules are pointless, just as life is pointless.
Him wanting to exact his thoughts and feelings on Gotham could stem from loneliness and the despair of what he's mentally going through. He's scared of being the only one who thinks those things and wants to make others understand him. Trying to prove to himself that he's not alone, and his views on the world should be how EVERYONE views them.
He see's no point in morals, doing what's right, obeying law and order, cause to him, life...existence is one big joke.
The scars? I think he inflicted those on himself after becoming 'truly' insane.
His hate for his father? Could come from the fact his dad was always bossing him around and being too authoritative with him. A cause for anti-social behaviour. His father is a representation of all that was good and sane with the world, and Joker cant bring himself to love a close family member who he probably had homicidal feelings for. So he paints his dad out to be somebody awful, who hated his son, when in reality its very much the opposite.
I can agree with everything you said.
Nevertheless I have the feeling that they used different types of psychological states for different parts. Just to make him less recognizable and so you couldn't put your finger right on his motivations.