- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Messages
- 5,799
- Reaction score
- 687
- Points
- 73
If the Rock is Lobo, does that make Lobo the first minority led superhero film since he's half black?
Does Will Smith in Hancock count?
If the Rock is Lobo, does that make Lobo the first minority led superhero film since he's half black?
They kind of have to. Undertaker hasn't worked with anybody new at WM since Edge at 24. If anybody not named Cena is going to end The Streak, Sheamus is the best choice of the fresh roster. He's over, is freaking huge, a good worker, and a former world champion. If he defeated The Undertaker, a "new guy" would get the rub and it would be believable.
While I personally wouldn't have a problem with Cena ending it, I know many would be against it. Better to have to a guy whose been around for a years get the nod than a veteran like Orton, Batista, or Sting.Sheamus couldn't beat Big Show and isn't even close to being as over as several guys on the roster, I don't see how this match would work at all and Taker doesn't necessarily need to face someone new, at this stage he needs to face a name player.
I'd like to see Rock/Orton, so many parallels and they have a history that not only goes back to their youth, but goes back a couple generations. They also had a segment back in the summer of 2004 that ended with Bischoff kicking Rock out of the building after verbally tearing Orton a new one.
I'd like to see Rock/Orton, so many parallels and they have a history that not only goes back to their youth, but goes back a couple generations. They also had a segment back in the summer of 2004 that ended with Bischoff kicking Rock out of the building after verbally tearing Orton a new one.
lol, they brought up continuity when addressing the handshake with Hunter. The Sage should be pleased with that.
Heyman dissing Dave sets up the feud between them. Guess Lesnar Vs. Undertaker is off the table unfortunately, but maybe I can finally get Sheamus Vs. Undertaker after all.
If Dave Vs. Brock does main event WrestleMania, I guess Rock Vs. Brock II really was going to be the main event of the show, Vince just got another wrestling actor to take the spot, lol.
Undertaker is getting old . They need to end it before he looks weak otherwise ending the streak will be pointless .
According to PWInsider, if "Stone Cold" Steve Austin was to be involved at WrestleMania 30, it would not be as an active pro wrestler. In the past, Austin has talked privately about the idea of working CM Punk in the past, but Punk is currently slated to wrestle Triple H at the event.
PWInsider also noted that Austin has not been receptive to the idea of working a match this year, which given his age, may completely close the window on Austin ever having another match.
http://www.pwpix.net/pwpixnews/headlines/390524166.php
Rollins also thanked a fan who commented on the match and wrote "It was rotten." Pretty sure he meant the match or his loss which he also acknowledged.So CM Punk didn't like his match with Seth Rollins. Wonder if the mistimed spots annoyed him.
I have a bad feeling about Wrestlemania 30.
I have a bad feeling about Wrestlemania 30.
So are the Wyatt's going to feud with the Authority or is the Wyatt's/Shield thing still supposed to happen?
Oh FFS. Really, people? How many times does the WWE have to prove you wrong, how many times does the WWE have to show you that they know what they're doing, how many times do they have to show you that you need to wait until a storyline plays out before you stop overanalyzing every move and reacting based on the assumption that they're going to do something stupid when there is no fact based reason to think that? This happens every time. EVERY. FREAKING. TIME. WWE does something you didn't expect, which means you didn't like it, and you all run to your little computers and either cry about how stupid it was without giving any thought whatsoever to where it's leading or you cry about how stupid it is because you're absolutely certain you know where it's leading and it must be leading somewhere stupid. Then the storyline plays out, it turns out WWE had the whole thing planned out perfectly, you were wrong about what they were going to do, and it all works out for them. Then you somehow either conveniently ignore the entire thing, or find some way to nitpick it or call it predictable. Because, afterall, that's what everything is; stupid or predictable.
Daniel Bryan is not going to be in the Wyatt Family for long. He's not going to stay heel. They're not doing this to bury him because their big egos are taking over or because they were upset he got cheered at the ascension ceremony. Seriously, that is absolutely freaking asinine.
This is the one of the oldest story lines in the book. Heel has some kind of control over the face, forces the face to do his bidding to great drama, eventually the face snaps and takes out the heel(s) in grand fashion. They just did it with Big Show and The Authority. They did it when John Cena was in Nexus. They did it with JBL and HBK. On and on.
I don't know where or when or how, but Daniel Bryan will turn back face(not that he'll ever really be a heel) and break free from the Wyatt Family, destroying Bray along the way, and will be even more over because of it. It's baffling that anybody could even consider any other possibility.