The Offical thread to Vent if need be.

What i don't get is in sollitude we see a glimpse of Zod coming out but, when it comes down to it they do the possession thing again. What the ****? I mean i don't mind Lex being Zod but, why show Zod coming out if that's the only tiem we see him.
 
I hate the movies sometime how they interfere with progree. I mean on memoria. How the **** can you have a seen on Krypton where you can't show Krypton.
 
I felt the same way when The Batman cartoon killed and chance of seeing people from Batmans world in JLU
 
All-Star Superman said:
I felt the same way when The Batman cartoon killed and chance of seeing people from Batmans world in JLU


They weren't allowd to cross over?

Personally that is my favorite DC interpretation in an animated series.

Batman: TAS was one of the greatest cartoons ever made.
 
Super_Ludacris said:
I dont know *shrug*
How come you cant spell scene?

I CAN SPELL SEEN I JUST MISPELT IT!

:unishr: :batty: :super: :daredevil :spidey: :doom: (just for fun)
 
i know. It was boss until they made Batman beyond. That was just on its ass. I mean it was liek the joker said he's just a punk kid taking orders from an old man
 
You can still have Batman crossover episodes. Dini/Timm are still doing stuff (New Frontier animated adaption coming soon. Darwyn Cooke is a dope illustrator man)
 
All-Star Superman said:
:(:(:(:cmad: You are right but I still think they could have shown him be little more hurt then what he was. I mean he married her.

No, he wasn't. Not legally, and really, when you consider that she DRUGGED him to even get him to the altar, you could argue that they weren't married in the way that really counts either - he never consented to marry her of his free will.

Sorry, not to bash your gal, but I never trusted her and she was NEVER good enough for Clark. She played him from day one, even after she was supposedly "cured." She totally betrayed him too. after all her coquettish claims of "I'll never tell your secret, Clark *fakecough*, she turned on him quicker than a dime as soon as she got pissed off that he wouldn't do things the way that SHE wanted them to be done.

No.. I do not mourn Alicia. BUT, I did like her episodes a lot. :) Great fun. :up: And I think Sarah whatshername, did a great job creating sexy, but dangerous Alicia.
 
Kaboom said:
um nope. i made one. yesterday as a matter of fact. and it was closed.

I don't understand why that was closed. :confused:
 
All-Star pretty much hates the show cause Alicia'was killed isnt it? Man let it go she was a freak of the week...
 
Oh, and last season they said it was going to be "superman in training". FIVE MINUTES OF TRAINING that's it. A lot of the time when he was there he was moaning to Jor-El. Oh, what would have happened if he went to the fortress after he took Lana to hospital
 
Serene said:
No, he wasn't. Not legally, and really, when you consider that she DRUGGED him to even get him to the altar, you could argue that they weren't married in the way that really counts either - he never consented to marry her of his free will.

When he is on Red K he does the things he would if he didn't have to face the consequences, that's why he couldn't kill on Red K, becuase he would never do that.
Sorry, not to bash your gal, but I never trusted her and she was NEVER good enough for Clark. She played him from day one, even after she was supposedly "cured." She totally betrayed him too. after all her coquettish claims of "I'll never tell your secret, Clark *fakecough*, she turned on him quicker than a dime as soon as she got pissed off that he wouldn't do things the way that SHE wanted them to be done.

She went to Chloe not some crazed maniac that would try and kill him, we all knew how she would have reacted and so did she, she didn't betray him she was trying to make things right between them. As for "quicker than a dime" she was in a mental house for a year because of him and didn't say anything and even took a bullet for him.
 
Red K really just shows a dark side or a rebellious side, I dont think it means he would do things he did with it if he wasnt on it or has a real desire cause there's always the concious side of him that explains logic Like " I cant marry Alicia she's a freak of the week, she's dead next week and anything less is weak" (say that 10 times really fast)
 
MJD said:
When he is on Red K he does the things he would if he didn't have to face the consequences, that's why he couldn't kill on Red K, becuase he would never do that.

So if someone gives a girl alcohol, and then takes advantage of them after they are drunk, does that then mean that the girl can not be considered a victim? Alcohol is known for making people do things they wouldn't normally do, or lose their inhibitions. Does that mean she wanted to have that situation happen...obviously not....she was taken advantage of, just as Clark was. He was effectively drunk and not thinking about what was going on, he was still a victim in that situation. He was rightfully angry when he came out of it, just as the girl would be rightfully angry once the alcohol left her system.

She went to Chloe not some crazed maniac that would try and kill him, we all knew how she would have reacted and so did she, she didn't betray him she was trying to make things right between them. As for "quicker than a dime" she was in a mental house for a year because of him and didn't say anything and even took a bullet for him.

She went to Chloe thinking chloe would print what she saw, thus revealing Clark to the town, and the world. She didn't realize Chloe's strength of character, and her loyalty to Clark. That was still an act out of hurt and anger, she wasn't doing it to better Clark, she was doing it to put Clark in her situation, so he was forced to see what she was going through. She was effectively taking away Clark's right to his own secrets and privacy.

It ultimately was a selfish act.
 
MJD said:
She went to Chloe not some crazed maniac that would try and kill him, we all knew how she would have reacted and so did she, she didn't betray him she was trying to make things right between them. As for "quicker than a dime" she was in a mental house for a year because of him and didn't say anything and even took a bullet for him.

You aren't reading what I wrote accurately. "Quicker than a dime" refers to her going from avowed loyalty to keeping Clark's secret, to betraying him as soon as he refused to do things her way (i.e. reveal himself to the world like she was). Thank goodness it was Chloe, someone that wouldn't betray him, that Alicia tried to "out" Clark to.

Oh.. and the bullet.. to the shoulder.. Smart girl. :rolleyes:

One of the things that makes Alicia such a great character is how differently she came off to people. I'm very cynical about all her motivations and actions, and I just think Clark deserves SO much better.

But I understand the "hotness" factor and how that plays into it too.. she snowed Clark, and I think she was so good, she snowed a lot of viewers too.
Give that girl an Emmy. ;)
 
Brainiac 8 said:
So if someone gives a girl alcohol, and then takes advantage of them after they are drunk, does that then mean that the girl can not be considered a victim? Alcohol is known for making people do things they wouldn't normally do, or lose their inhibitions. Does that mean she wanted to have that situation happen...obviously not....she was taken advantage of, just as Clark was. He was effectively drunk and not thinking about what was going on, he was still a victim in that situation. He was rightfully angry when he came out of it, just as the girl would be rightfully angry once the alcohol left her system.

Completely different, how is it different? Watch the epsiode again and see how Martha reacts to it, if he was as inocent as you claim she wouldn't have reacted in that manner.

She went to Chloe thinking chloe would print what she saw, thus revealing Clark to the town, and the world. She didn't realize Chloe's strength of character, and her loyalty to Clark. That was still an act out of hurt and anger, she wasn't doing it to better Clark, she was doing it to put Clark in her situation, so he was forced to see what she was going through. She was effectively taking away Clark's right to his own secrets and privacy.

It ultimately was a selfish act.

Just as it was selfish for Clark not to go to press to help clear her name. When I said he went to Chloe I meant that she knew Chloe that if Chloe printed the story she would put a postive spin on it, not to mention Clark was the most popular guy in the town, he would have been protected.

You aren't reading what I wrote accurately. "Quicker than a dime" refers to her going from avowed loyalty to keeping Clark's secret, to betraying him as soon as he refused to do things her way (i.e. reveal himself to the world like she was). Thank goodness it was Chloe, someone that wouldn't betray him, that Alicia tried to "out" Clark to.

He had refused to do things her way all the time, it was always his way or the highway. BTW Clark betrayed her first by taking the scarf to the shrief. And its not like Chloe hasn't protrayed him before.
Oh.. and the bullet.. to the shoulder.. Smart girl. :rolleyes:

What your point? Should she have taking it to the heart.

One of the things that makes Alicia such a great character is how differently she came off to people. I'm very cynical about all her motivations and actions, and I just think Clark deserves SO much better.

Other than his parents and Pete she's the only one that always just saw him as a person, right from the start, Lex saw him as a mystry, Chloe as a scope, Lana as a web of lies, Jessie(was that her name) as Narmard andLois as an idoit. And he wouldn't trust her, if anything she deserves better
But I understand the "hotness" factor and how that plays into it too.. she snowed Clark, and I think she was so good, she snowed a lot of viewers too.
Give that girl an Emmy

If the hotness factor came into it I would never question Lana, yet I do
 
Alicia tried to out Clark for her selfish desires, Clark "outed" Felicia because she allegidly tried to kill Lana (as if anyone else in Clarks life was in danger...)
 
MJD said:
Completely different, how is it different? Watch the epsiode again and see how Martha reacts to it, if he was as inocent as you claim she wouldn't have reacted in that manner.

The reason Martha reacted the way she did was because Clark allowed himself to get into that situation in the first place.

If a girl was taken advantage of due to alcohol, then the parents would be angry that the girl put herself in a situation that resulted in her getting drunk. Clark should have avoided the situation in the first place, and she was right in that. It still doesn't make him any less a victim.
 
Syn (Mercenary) said:
Alicia tried to out Clark for her selfish desires, Clark "outed" Felicia because she allegidly tried to kill Lana (as if anyone else in Clarks life was in danger...)

who is felicia?
 
Kaboom said:
who is felicia?
LOL Whoops. I was typing while thinking, bad idea for me. I meant Alicia. I typed Felicia cause I was looking at something with Black Cat and my mind typed that instead of...lets just leave it as I'm stupid. lol
 
dont be so harsh on yourself...try occupied?
 
Kaboom said:
dont be so harsh on yourself...try occupied?
No, I gotta go hard core emo. Cut myself till I die! LOL No I'm kidding. Thats just a sterotype. But, you know that "Treat others as you would treat yourself" thing? I like to bash others for being stupid, so I have to bash myself too. I don't want to be bias. LOL
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"