Dread
TMNT 1984-2009
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Messages
- 21,788
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I buy New Avengers because I thoroughly enjoy it no question. I love the characters, the street level feel, and the stories (save the 1959 Avengers flashback story) and I just keep getting more and more excited at the return of Norman and the (or at least "a") Dark Avengers... along with Daredevil joining the team.
Avengers I'm a little less excited about because I don't care as much for the characters or art and I thought the first arc sucked. But the Hood/Red Hulk/Infinity Gems arc was pretty good and I really enjoyed the .1 issue with Ultron's return, preparing for next year's big story. So I'm sticking with this one out of curiousity moreso than like, habit, or importance.
I just tend to find that Bendis's quirks annoy me less than others and I've grown used to overlooking them to see the plot buried within. Sometimes it's worse than others and even I can't get past them (first issue of the Fear Itself tie-in I'm looking at you) but overall I still find I enjoy his Avengers issues.
Bendis' NEW AVENGERS didn't start out very well at all - in fact, issue #2 still stands as one of my least favorite issues ever. The glaring errors and the disregard for criticism of them afterward online still disgust me. But, at that point I'd liked Bendis' DAREDEVIL run and was still aboard USM so I was hoping he'd get better. And while some arcs and issues were better, I never really liked the title too much. I stayed on for 3+ years for little purpose other than how "important" the title was. And to give credit, quite a few posters on SHH would respond to my consistent hate-fest reviews with so much, but I was too bull-headed to listen and dump the book until after SECRET INVASION wrapped. The last issue that was $2.99, or close to it, was my last. But eventually I did dump the book, and man, I haven't missed it since. Come to think of it, virtually ANY title I have either hated or become apathetic for that I have abandoned, I haven't missed. I haven't missed IIM, even though I read it for years. Same with THOR, or USM, or the volume of MOON KNIGHT that I ditched before VENGEANCE OF THE MOON KNIGHT started.
Sometimes as fans we get so caught up in things, like hype or the universe or wanting to know every little detail of said universe, we sometimes can forget to take a breath and honestly assess whether we truly enjoy what we buy, especially for these prices. I can't say I am perfect at that now, but I do believe I am better at that sort of thing than I was in 2005, or 2008.
Of course, I still genuinely enjoy AMAZING SPIDER-MAN post "BIG TIME" while you lost interest, so to each their own. So long as someone genuinely likes Bendis Avenger titles, or Jeph Loeb books, or so on, buy 'em. Just as someone who's been there, buying books you don't honestly enjoy for any reason sucks, especially for $3.99.
Hell, the fact that I've stuck on SECRET AVENGERS past issue #12 shows that I'm hardly perfect at what I've just preached, either. I would have probably been justified if I'd ditched it after issues #3-#4, which I despised. Those were the worst issues of anything I'd read from Brubaker since X-MEN: DEADLY GENESIS where he killed off Banshee (one of my Top 10 favorite X-Men) for little reason other than to hype Vulcan, his new baddie. In fairness, he did rebound from there, but not to as vast a degree as I'd have liked.
In Brubaker's defense he actually planned on having Nova involved long term. Sadly, he realized too late that the ending of Thanos Imperative negated that idea and Nova only lasted the first arc and had to exit, so we can thank DnA for that failure![]()
Or blame editorial for not knowing what one hand was doing. Given that the role of Nova in that story was to be brainwashed and then beaten by Rogers, you could have inserted just about any space-worthy hero into that role and the story would have remained similar. That said, Brubaker chose to introduce Nova to a wider audience by having him get immediately brainwashed and pitted against his team, and then owned by Rogers. THANOS IMPERATIVE had nothing to do with that narrative decision.
It's fine that Brubaker loves Steve Rogers, truly. His CAPTAIN AMERICA was the first run of that franchise I paid to read, and while I did enjoy Barnes as Cap a little more to a degree, Brubaker does write Steve very well. However, while that is awesome in a solo title, in a team book I usually expect more balance.
The second arc was much better than the first but that non-conclusion absolutely kills me. I'm expecting him to pick up on it in one of his Captain America books but I don't read those so it's just a major dropped plot for me making his run on the book a waste of time. I find that if you ignore Bru's final two issues with John Steele it's a better read and feels more concluded as far as the larger plot goes. Some of the bad guys get away to cause terror another day but the good guys won and we conclude the story that began in the first arc with the resurrection and death of Shang Chi's father.
Agreed.
That said, part of me is a little dismayed about Brubaker's major contribution there being the invention of a new "secret evil organization" in a universe that has too many to spare. Fred Van Lente made fun of how many there are in TASKMASTER, and it was brilliant. The Shadow Council is simply the latest to join the Secret Empire, or the Serpent Society, or HYDRA, or AIM (which has splinter groups like RAID), or ULTIMATUM, or the Corporation, or...
I got annoyed when the Secret Avengers would get to fight actual super-villains in every comic appearance BUT their own title. True, those consisted of Captain Barracuda and Dr. Bong, but it's still better than a bunch of nameless extras in black suits. Plus, to be fair to Gregg Horwitz, casting Capt. Barracuda as a modern day pirate like many that have plagued ships lately was a solid move for the final issue of VOTMK. This team seems more like a squad of Defenders than Avengers based on what they fight, which is unintentionally ironic since it has members who have actually been Defenders for stretches of time - Valkyrie, Beast, and Moon Knight.
I think if Spencer were on long term I'd still be buying the book, as I enjoyed his .1 issue and the Beast-centric issue, but with only being around for 4 issues doesn't do it for me. Ellis I might skim and try out but again, with it only being 6 issues and his sketchy track record I'm not sure I'm willing to give him a shot on this title. I might change my mind if I find myself with more buying room and the issues look good or get reviews, but I doubt it.
I would have been more optimistic has Spencer been the new long term writer. The dilemma is he isn't as big a name as Brubaker and Marvel wanted another big name there. Ellis' star has fallen in recent years, but he's still a name. Then...why not have Ellis come in immediately? Because he probably either needed time to write scripts, and/or he didn't want to do crossover issues. Thus, Spencer, like Gillen on THOR, was tasked with some "dirty work" (or "garbage time" as they call it in basketball). Gillen only got extra issues on THOR when Fraction & Ferry needed more time than initially expected, which was for the better for him (and us). That said, while the .1 issue was a neat take on a real story, Spencer's issues have been underwhelming. His first two got VERY preachy by the end, and his 3rd was the epitome of "meh". Even if his 4th and last issue is an A+, that only would make his "run" average out to B-, the high side of average. And I don't expect SA #15 to be anywhere near that good.
As for Ellis, the last thing I read of his was ULTIMATE FANTASTIC FOUR, which was very hit-or-miss. I've read little positive about his ASTONISHING X-MEN run, and he has very weird ideas. But it's the editorial thing. 6 issues is little longer than 4, and it shows Marvel has no clue what to do with SA other than sell it at an inflated price with new stories inside. And I already spend enough on comics that I don't need to take part in an unplanned experiment on how many Avengers books the market can support. Say what you will of AVENGERS ACADEMY, but it at least has had a more consistent premise. 3 creative team shifts in under 2 years is not the sign of a stable, well thought out franchise title, especially one that's friggin' four bucks a pop.
It was definately an interesting book and I still skim every issue on the day it comes out. What hurts it, for me anyhow, is that there's been a small influx of young hero teams lately and it's just become another book of teenagers. The Young Avengers were followed by 2 to 3 teams/generations in the Initiative, which was then followed by Avengers Academy. Add those to various Initiative state teams, the Runaways, the Young Allies, Young X-Men, and the Generation Hope kids and they just get lost in the mix.
As you and I have said before... they're just creating too man teen or new heroes and have nothing for them to do other than play cannon fodder and cameos in events. It gets to a point when people stop carring. If you're going to have up and coming heroes, DO SOMETHING WITH THEM. Make them imporant in some way other than just being there, and follow up with it. Make me care about these characters. The fading away of the Runaways and the Initiative crew and the misshandling of the Young Avengers makes me not want to get too heavily invested in Avengers Academy because I figure it won't amount to much by this time next year.
I WANT to see them succeed but I don't trust Marvel to handle yet another young team.
In fairness, didn't AVENGERS ACADEMY debut before GENERATION HOPE did? While YOUNG ALLIES debuted at the same time, that book's sales were DOA and it was canned so fast, Marvel solicited an issue they never published. The last time I recall that happening was when X-MEN EVOLUTION, the comic based on the then-new cartoon on KID'S WB, ended at issue #9 in 2002.
I was saddened to see RUNAWAYS peter out (although after the Whedon/Ryan run I watched it from afar). It seems nobody has managed to capture the magic with them like their creators did. Still, Marvel TRIED with new creative teams. They didn't even go that far with YOUNG AVENGERS, which was odd since YA sold a lot better than RUNAWAYS did out of the gate. RUNAWAYS was always a cult book.
You are correct about the editorial mismanagement and lack of communication or coordination of a lot of these young characters. Part of me wonders if this has happened since Marvel started spitting out TEEN TITANS clones. Did the NEW MUTANTS ever seriously do anything vitally important, or did they just exist in their own merry world and only tag in, briefly, for crossovers? How about GENERATION X? Or even the NEW WARRIORS, a book that Marvel tried to desperately attach to the Spider-Man line towards the end of it's first volume? Did the NW ever defeat a big threat the "big heroes" couldn't? They didn't beat Terrax because he'd beaten any other heroes...they were just there first. Very few of the characters from the 80's and 90's generation got to "step up", thus, expecting more of the 21st century kids could be optimistic at best, for you and me. Which is a shame. Look, readers aren't stupid. They know Spider-Man is older than some of their parents. New blood never hurts.
People care about the characters if they're written consistently well, usually by one writer for a while. The problem is Marvel has bred a market in which quality doesn't sell - importance and name power do. It is very difficult to make new characters "important" because retailers and readers have become very cynical about Marvel's loyalty to them. They tug in their tail and flee at the first sign of a new franchise struggling. For all the loyalty HERC and BLACK PANTHER and MOON KNIGHT get, many other franchises get left for dead.
Still...if one ignores something they truly enjoy for pure editorial reasons, they risk becoming part of the problem. If too few people read AA, it gets canceled and then it negates all hope of them becoming "important". In fairness, Marvel has started to try to promote it - they crossed over into ASM, and had a debut issue reprinted for free in another title.
If Marvel were really bold, they'd make their newer characters like the AA key for a major crossover and all but force readers to embrace them. It has a high chance of backfire...but do does DC relaunching 52 titles this fall, but they're doing that.
At least with the various generations of X-Students they're folded into the larger X-Men fold when their generation fades away. These days Cyclops, Colossus, Cannonball, Chamber, and Anole are all equal in the eyes of the X-Men. The Avengers corner can't say the same.
You are seriously, with a straight face, telling me that Marvel considers Chamber, Anole, and Cannonball as important as Cyclops or Colossus? That's baloney. Just because the Utopia subplot has basically forced everyone who was ever marginally an X-Man to live together and all appear in group panels doesn't mean they're all equal. You will never see Marvel promote an X-MEN event that crosses over to all titles and causes some to relaunch that consists of Cyclops, Emma Frost, Wolverine, Magneto, and all the big characters down and out with the world depending on Anole, Chamber, and Rockslide in a 7 part epic for $3.99 a pop. Not happening. The X-Men universe have been a killing field for new characters. How many members of Generation X or Academy X are now dead? How many have been mutilated? How many depowered and/or forgotten? Jubilee was on TV for 5 damn seasons and Marvel basically forgot about her for YEARS.
Aside for the NEW WARRIORS, and even with them that's only Microbe and Dwayne Taylor, most non-X younger heroes are alive, just in limbo or the fringes.
Plus, the X-Men have usually taken Colossus for granted anyway. He did nothing but mope, be boring, or be ignored for years when he was killed off to end the Legacy Virus saga. Then he returns 4 years later and after one awesome beat-down of Ord (a comedy villain), he does nothing of consequence since. He does nothing but be boring, be mopey, or be "edgy" and join the bad guys. He's a good guy stuck in a franchise that only embraces jerks, monsters, and anti-heroes. Virtually every X-Man who had any sort of positive outlook had to leave the franchise for stretches of time to prosper (Beast specifically, but also Iceman and Angel; even Storm for a spell). I believe Marvel considers No Girl about as important as Colossus. He's just there to stand in back-ground panels and punch/lift something. And even THEN, it's nothing impressive. You won't see him go the distance against the Hulk like Thing does. The last time Colossus did anything that screamed "wow", it was probably INFERNO - which was the late 80's. And guess what? No writer since has remembered a key detail from that, which was Colossus being immune to black magic. That's a great detail to have, which sets him apart from other mutants and "strong guys", that has gone ignored. Now? Despite Illyana and Kitty coming back, he still remained dull or mopey. Now he'll become the Juggernaut - another turn as an "edgy" bad guy.
Then again, Cyclops has become a maniac who genuinely believes reviving Dracula to stop an army of vampires is the best idea, or saving mutantkind from being killed off forever by sticking them on an isolated island that can be ravaged in a single attack. Thus, it makes sense that some of that poor decision sense would rub off. Surely the best idea to stop Juggernaut, who is being possessed by an evil entity, is to yourself become possessed by another evil entity. Piotr's an artist, not a genius.
