Cain
Gentlebane
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2005
- Messages
- 6,174
- Reaction score
- 143
- Points
- 48
And if you actually, literally, cover your face when walking into or out of your local comic store - wow, that's sad.
lol true indeed.
And if you actually, literally, cover your face when walking into or out of your local comic store - wow, that's sad.
This post has so much promise.DC Needs to simplify things.
You don't understand...what? A whole bunch of superheroes live in one universe. It's relatively simple. As for all of the arcane continuity...of course you don't. You're casual. A few years ago, I was casual too. That didn't stop me from thoroughly enjoying the Batman titles. Then I started picking up JLA books. I got interested in Green Lantern, and from there Flash. I finally started giving Superman a chance. Infinite Crisis, for all its faults, made me a full-blown DC fan. I'm not saying that will happen to you, because you're clearly too hip and cool to ever like something that's just plain fun, but you could very easily understand the DCU without too much effort, and even if you couldn't, you could very easily read individual books while giving the finger to the rest of them. As a matter of fact, that's how the majority of DC and Marvel readers do it. It's not all-or-nothing. Can you handle all this complexity I'm throwing at you?As a casual reader, I HATE the whole concept of "the DCU." I don't understand it, I don't want to take the time to understand it.
What's the point or impetus for a teamup book without the constituent characters living in the same universe? The majority of the reason superhero comics have been made to work for adults and older kids is that the stories matter after they're published. When everything exists only unto itself, and there's nothing to interact with, you have to rely solely upon a writer's "plan" for a long-range narrative arc. Some writers don't do superhero books that way. Some writers just want to write.As far as I'm concerned, all the superheroes should live in their own worlds in their own timelines. (Unless we're talking JLA or a combination series like Batman/Superman)
You know, a friend of mine has a moped. I asked him once why he didn't just get a motorcycle. He said, "If I'd wanted a motorcycle, I'd have bought a ****ing motorcycle."Also they should put less of an emphasis on superheroes and more of a TV-show style approach. Imagine something like House as a comic series, or Law and Order. Blow the whole "superhero fanboy" image of comics out of the water, it'd go better to a casual audience.
No, hipsters like you who are still ashamed that you like comics, superhero or otherwise, and who therefore actively choose to perceive that image and tell all your friends about it so you can distance yourself from it...that's who's killing the general perception of comics. The fact of the matter is, most everyone on this board is an upstanding member of his or her community. I don't know if everyone wants to go into details of their personal life at the moment, but I'm a successful Social Work/History major preparing to graduate in December with honors and a job waiting for me in a child permanence agency. I am a National Merit scholar, I scored a 34 on the ACT, and I was a four-time State Debate champion in high school. My high school baseball team, which I pitched and played second base for, placed fourth in the State two years in a row. In my summers I work at a camp for people with special needs. I will be leaving college with no student loans, having paid for everything with academic scholarship money. I have a beautiful girlfriend.I know, but I have no problem saying it because I'm of the belief that fanboys are killing the general perception of comics and preventing them from reaching a wider audience.
You walk in, you buy your books, you leave. Simple.Many people are intimidated by the whole "comic shop" scene because it's not in their personality.
Sooooooooooooooo predictable. If you want reality, go watch a security camera. I want fiction, so I embrace it in all forms, as long as it's done well. I suppose you don't like Transmetropolitan, Fables, Hellblazer, Sandman, Maus, or Sin City either because they're about, respectively, a futuristic gonzo journalist, anthropomorphic fairty tales, a street magician, a dream-god, mice playing out the Holocaust, and ridiculously caricatured gangsters taking way more physical punishment than is physically possible?Hell, Batman's the only superhero I can really get into because his world is (somewhat) reality-based.
Fortunately, you don't have to. There is no quiz at the end of the comic book. Read what you want, and if it's too arcane and convoluted, stop reading it and stop buying it. On the other hand, that seems impossible for fanboys to do, so maybe you won't be able to do it either.It's too complex to understand years of continuity and how every book ties into each other in some sort of way.
Here's a little slice of my life: I love the X-Men. They exist in the Marvel Universe. Thor also exists in the Marvel Universe. However, his book is boring and slow, and his character appeals to me less than rotten snail-*** appeals to my tongue. So I don't read his book. Sometimes, problems are really easy to solve.I have no interest in reading The Flash, for instance.
Actually, because of your ilk, it's the opposite. Almost nobody will acknowledge that superhero comics can be good, because you people emphasize Maus, Persepolis, Ghost World, and ****ing Blankets as if they were God's gift to literature. Oh sure, EW does a story on Secret Invasion, and then one on Final Crisis, and high-profile books like Hush and Geoff Johns' early Green Lantern get a few cursory nods from the mainstream, but it's just the literary snobs giving their bastard children some token recognition. Your kind has successfully pigeonholed superhero comics and superhero comic-book readers for the foreseeable future. Thanks so much, snotnose.Many people don't realize great comics like Maus, Persepolis, Ghost World, etc. exist because there's so much emphasis on superheroes.
The form has survived more dire straits than any that you've been around for, Joe Hipster.I think it's essential for comics survival to promote more comics like these, and get out of the comic shops and onto newsstands/have more prominent space in Barnes and Noble and Borders.
(and more morally gray, which you'll like, since you don't believe in things like "good people" and "the right thing," as a House fan)
I like House because he's an *******, because I'm an *******.I think that's a little unfair. I enjoy House, mainly because I find him and how he and the characters interact interesting. I still think he's an *******, but he's an ******* who's interesting to write about and watch. I think.
Many people are intimidated by the whole "comic shop" scene because it's not in their personality. I cover my face and make sure no one I know is around before I walk in and out of my local comic shop. Hell, Batman's the only superhero I can really get into because his world is (somewhat) reality-based.
I, for one, proudly show my face when I make my daily adult paraphernalia runs.Wow, I really hope you're 15 years old and there's still time for you to grow out of that ****. I can't imagine anything more awful than a grown man who can't walk into a store and buy a book he wants to read without worrying how people are going to judge him for it. Or at least any store that doesn't sell nipple clamps and double-ended dongs.
Fixed that for you.Superman always seemed to do good for it's own sake, and didn't really have a compelling reason which is fine, but I always found every fictional character ever to be boring unless handled by a really really good writer.
Yeah, but he'll be back eventually, I'm sure.
*reads Wikipedia*
....Aquaman's dead?
This is.....unfortunate.![]()
That's the second component of why I was sad about all the Outsiders upheaval.Yeah, but the guy that wrote that wasn't gonna be writing Outsiders anyway. The entire dynamic could have been ignored by What's his name in favor of unnecessary clone angst.