The Official Flash thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
They're close, but retcon means something either did or did not happen and that they're continuing a story, not starting over completely. Rebooting means restarting completely, and doing new, unconnected stories.

Yeah, I realize. I wasn't being literal I was just restating my point.



That's how you may see it and how DC will try to sell it but the truth is, he is more The Flash than anyone else. Sorry, but it's true. The iconicism is all Barry's, his time as Flash still dwarfs everone else's, if there's anyone who deserves to be called The Flash then it's definitely Barry.

No, that's not true in the least. If it was really true that Barry Allen 'dwarfs' the other Flashes so much then he would have been the Flash in every other portrayal of the character outside the comic medium and he would have returned to main Flash status years ago. He's no more the iconic Flash then Wally and Wally earned the title of The Flash despite what you may think. You could maybe make that argument in say...1992 or something, but nowadays, no.

I'm speaking in the comic sense anyway. I would argue that neither of those character's are really iconic in the broad sense of the word

I agree with you in regard to the death and replacement being the best in comics history, but I do not think he needs to stay dead and am glad that both he and Hal have returned. They are too good to stay dead and have a large and dedicated following. As long as there are still good stories to tell and a market for those characters then there isn't any reason why any character should stay dead.

And I will have to disagree. I see no reason to every bring back Barry Allen. Hal's situation was radically different and that's another story.
 
Last edited:
.................F**k Barry Allen..........That is all.
 
I like to change it up every once in awhile thank you very much. :o
 
No, that's not true in the least. If it was really true that Barry Allen 'dwarfs' the other Flashes so much then he would have been the Flash in every other portrayal of the character outside the comic medium

But he is. They always use his story and elements. Real Wally West has never been used, even on JL/JLU. (here we go again, anyone who's familiar with my posts knows how this will end... :whatever: )

and he would have returned to main Flash status years ago.

He had in more ways than one. Ever since they started giving Wally signature Barry elements; the old costume, book logo, reporter wife/gf, police job, Kid Flash and Zoom of his own, reviving the classic Rogues, even brought Iris West back, only thing missing was actual Barry Allen.

He's no more the iconic Flash then Wally and Wally earned the title of The Flash despite what you may think.

He may have "earned" it, but that is only because Barry gave him something to "earn". Barry started all that **** on his own, with no one to "look" or "live up to". Wally spent his early career being a ***** and ****ing up, despite years of training and being a superhero (that Barry didn't have) as Kid Flash.

You could maybe make that argument in say...1992 or something, but nowadays, no.

I can and will, and it oviously isn't a faulty argument because, hey - the inevitable happened - The Flash is back.

I'm speaking in the comic sense anyway. I would argue that neither of those character's are really iconic in the broad sense of the word

Ditto.

And I will have to disagree. I see no reason to every bring back Barry Allen. Hal's situation was radically different and that's another story.

The short and simple version: The world needs heroes, few guys were more heroic than Barry. Crisis is now irrelevant, and so is Barry's death. Good stories never go out of style, and Barry has plenty left in him. As long as good stories can be told with Barry and he has a fan base/audience, I see no reason to keep him dead. He's a major character who carries his own title, he wasn't created to be dead, let's tell some more stories with him. That goes for any "dead" character.

And if they brought ****ing BUCKY BARNES and JASON TODD (!!!!) back, then it's waaaaaay past time Barry should have returned. I mean get real here.
 
But he is. They always use his story and elements. Real Wally West has never been used, even on JL/JLU. (here we go again, anyone who's familiar with my posts knows how this will end... :whatever: )

That's not my point. They still used Wally West. It may have not been the 'true' Wally West or whatever, but it was him. That shows something right there.

Not sure what your last little bit is suppose to mean.

He had in more ways than one. Ever since they started giving Wally signature Barry elements; the old costume, book logo, reporter wife/gf, police job, Kid Flash and Zoom of his own, reviving the classic Rogues, even brought Iris West back, only thing missing was actual Barry Allen.

Exactly. Elements of Allen were there, but Allen has been absent for all this time. I'm not arguing that Barry wasn't influencial to the current Flash line, but he was gone.

He may have "earned" it, but that is only because Barry gave him something to "earn". Barry started all that **** on his own, with no one to "look" or "live up to". Wally spent his early career being a ***** and ****ing up, despite years of training and being a superhero (that Barry didn't have) as Kid Flash.

Yeah, and Barry wouldn't have had it to give if not for Jay Garrick, the original Flash. Even if Barry was created as a new generation era hero he was still based on him. Without Jay Barry probably wouldn't exist in the form we know him as. The point is, so what, it doesn't matter who created the torch, the torch was passed successfully and rightfully. If the torch is passed again it should be passed forward, not backward.

If DC hadn't totally blotched Bart's series and character of The Flash, and made something worth a damn out of him as that character to make him at least equal to Barry and Wally, I may very well be in this same position when/if Wally had returned to reclaim The Flash name in 25 years.

I can and will, and it oviously isn't a faulty argument because, hey - the inevitable happened - The Flash is back.

I beg to differ. If your logic was so flawless Barry would have been back a long time ago. There was no movements to bring him back and the main reason everyone is jumping on it now is the big name behind it, the loads of hype and just the overall apathy I believe most readers have about who is really under the mask. When Johns leaves the title, leaves DC or his name begins to fade, we will see when the dust settles where the real 'legacy' of Barry Allen stands

The short and simple version: The world needs heroes, few guys were more heroic than Barry. Crisis is now irrelevant, and so is Barry's death. Good stories never go out of style, and Barry has plenty left in him. As long as good stories can be told with Barry and he has a fan base/audience, I see no reason to keep him dead. He's a major character who carries his own title, he wasn't created to be dead, let's tell some more stories with him. That goes for any "dead" character.

Much of Crisis has been rectonned but that doesn't make the story irrelevant and it sure as hell doesn't make Barry's death either. I'm not a comic book historian or anything but I think you could say that Barry's death may have been the death of the Silver Age of comics, or at least been a significant part of it, like Gwen Stacy (Another character that I believe has no right being revived). And since I refuse to believe an age can be reborn or rebirthed, despite how hard DC is trying, Barry Allen should stay dead in my eyes.

You don't agree, whatever, you're opinion, but I can tell you now that you aren't changing mine as I assume I'm probably not changing yours. However, I stick to my guns on this subject, probably more so then any other issue in comic books

And if they brought ****ing BUCKY BARNES and JASON TODD (!!!!) back, then it's waaaaaay past time Barry should have returned. I mean get real here.

I never thought Jason Todd should have been brought back either and it's mostly been complete crap on his return. As far as I'm concerned they should kill him off again and move the **** on already.

Bucky is different. They brought Bucky back in a pretty radically different role. He didn't come back as Bucky the lovable sidetrack character. DC is just bringing Barry back in the same role to regress continuity.

And, to be honest, I never felt the way about Bucky that I did about Barry and Jason. I figured if they could bring back Cap. Bucky wasn't such a far fetch.

Even if I had I doubt I'd feel nearly as strongly about his death as I do Barrys. Barry's death is probably about the only death that's all important, that's well written, just flat-out epic and actually 'feels' like a book closing ending. It's literally the perfect ending that no other superhero death has come close to even glimpsing as far as I believe.

It almost seems to me that fans would love this for 'their' character. A good, long 30 year run, influencing the future of the line and a perfect death. To me the "Well, I like Barry though..." just isn't relevant. I could understand if his replacement had sucked or something, but Wally didn't by any mean, and it was a natural progression that his sidekick took over to boot; it's perfect.

Of course the next thing to say is the criticism of 'Woah man, you are taking this way too seriously'. And, yes, it's true that I probably am. As I said before though, I don't ask a lot from this medium, but what I do ask I do feel pretty strongly about. Deaths like Barry Allen and Gwen Stacy don't happen often and, frankly, we may never see them again. There's zero reason, in my eyes, to undo these deaths and, in fact, I think they devalue the character.
 
Last edited:
The Hawkgirl and John Stewart that appeared on JL/JLU certainly weren't the "real" Hawkgirl, and John Stewart of the comics. But that doesn't mean they weren't Hawkgirl and John Stewart. Hell, compared to them, Timmverse Wally was practically a mirror version of his early comics incarnation.
 
No, that's not true in the least. If it was really true that Barry Allen 'dwarfs' the other Flashes so much then he would have been the Flash in every other portrayal of the character outside the comic medium and he would have returned to main Flash status years ago. He's no more the iconic Flash then Wally and Wally earned the title of The Flash despite what you may think. You could maybe make that argument in say...1992 or something, but nowadays, no.
I agree completely with you. Wally is the Flash. He established himself like this. And all that was "part of Barry's universe" (Like Iris, or Kid Flash) was, in my opinion, to make Wally universe richer. I mean there is no reason to erase Iris just because Wally is the Flash, I think it is a good idea to keep her, or Jay. I did not like the idea of Kid Flash at all, but i thought that if a kid Flash was needed in the Flash mythos , then let be it. But I think it was because of the whole mythos, not to do "like the old days". Bringing back the Rogues as full villainy was not in order to copy Barry but, IMO, to make stronger the establishment of Wally as Flash. Wally earned the title. He is Flash. There was no need of bringing back Barry Allen (except if WB pushed it for a film :nono: ). I agree with what you are saying, Wally was established as the Flash. He is the Flash.
And I will have to disagree. I see no reason to every bring back Barry Allen. Hal's situation was radically different and that's another story.
One more time I completely agree with you. There was no need to bring back Barry.
And more important, you are right, Hal's Situation was completely different, that's another story, as you put it. Wally and Kyle were 2 different way to deal with a reboot of each title.
 
Haven't you been banned for trolling yet? :whatever:


hateyous.jpg
 
Dan DiDio says something awesome for once:

Right now, we’ve got Ethan and Geoff pushing pretty hard on Flash: Rebirth, and once we get a little closer, we’ll be announcing the team on the Flash monthly comic. It’s all part of a bigger announcement, because it’s not just about one Flash book.
 
Can I get a "Duh, totally called it forever ago"? 'Cause I did. :oldrazz:
 
Cool then, at least Wally probably won't get outright shafted then with that, whatever it ends up being
 
Umm are we not getting an issue of Rebirth this month?
 
That's not my point. They still used Wally West. It may have not been the 'true' Wally West or whatever, but it was him. That shows something right there.


*sighs*.....

Not sure what your last little bit is suppose to mean.

You're about to find out. :hehe:

Because I have this debate a lot with people over who's been used most in alternate media appearances, here's my pre-made response from the Flash film thread about why Barry has been used in all the alternate media appearances:

You gotta be kidding me. You think that was Wally West? :lmao:

Puh-lease. Now I'm beginning to doubt if you've ever read any Wally comics.

The JL/JLU Flash was a combination of the 3 Flashes. They used Barry Allen's story, Wally West's name and appearance, and Bart Allen's impulsive personality.

Barry Allen's story elements: He lived in Central City, was a forensic scientist who was hit by lightning in a lab (Barry's origin), he has Barry's job, all his silver age foes, status as being the first scarlet speedster and co-founded the Justice League - all Barry Allen's story. The REAL Wally West doesn't have a single alternate media appearence that he can call his own. When have they ever delved into the "legacy" and Wally's origin and his history as Kid Flash that makes him so "special" and movie worthy? Not even once. I don't even think Keystone City was mentioned.

The Wally West elements were his name and appearance. That was about it. Oh, and Linda Park appeared in an episode and the speed force was referenced once. That about rounds out the Wally West elements of the JL/JLU Flash - kinda sucks if you were expecting the guy from the comics.

Bart Allen elements: The impulsive personality. It was a less punkish Bart Allen. The creators were even going to use Impulse when they originally pitched the show so there would be some kid memebers in the JLA. They were pitching to Wb originally, and WB likes shows with kid protagonists over adult ones. But they actually ended up using The Flash, as we all know, but they kept that personality. Wally West in the comics is much more intelligent than the JL/JLU Flash and acts more like Anakin Skywalker. A lot of this Flash was how the creators of the show wanted to characterize him and not necessarily how he was displayed in the comics.

That is especially true in the case of John Stewart, Hawkgirl, and The Flash. John Stewart in the comics was a black stereotype for a long time, and the marine, hardass, by-the-books, no onsense angle they added to him and has since become part of the comics. Same with Hawkgirl, she was kind of a ***** on the show, not quite how she was in the comics either.


So, in short:

They used Barry's story because it's the simplest to "get", i. e., not bogged down by legacy continuity and grew up with Barry/were most familiar with him, they used Wally's name and likenes at the end of season two because he was The Flash in the current comics which were very popular at the time because of Geoff Johns, and they used Bart's impulsive personality because they were originally going to use Impulse in the JLA instead of Flash because they were pitching the series to WB and WB likes mostly kid/teen characters in their shows. When they sold the show to Cartoon Network with a phone call they decided to use The Flash because he's such of a staple in the JLA and because they were doing CN and they don't mind cartoons with more adult protagonists, but they kept the personality so young kids would have someone to identify with.

So the JL/JLU Flash is really just a red haired, idiotic Barry Allen.



Quote:
Clearly, there is a divide in the fanbase over which Flash they should use, which is why IMO thye should honor both characters by doing the movie as a "passing of the torch" story.

This is the type of thing that will drive away new audiences and exactly why the creators of JL/JLU gave Wally Barry's story in the first place:

From http://jl.toonzone.net/flash/flash.htm


Quote:
Fundamentally the Flash is a difficult character to adapt, as his history from the comic books draws heavily from what has become known as the “Flash Legacy,” a mythos that has become both a blessing and a curse for the character. Here, Wally West is the third man to take up the mantle of the Flash, with Jay Garrick (the Golden Age Flash) and Barry Allen (the Silver Age Flash) coming before him…and this doesn’t even take into account the presence of Johnny Quick, Max Mercury, Jesse Quick, Impulse—a literal army of speedsters that spans hundreds of years, with each of them connected to the Speed Force, a fundamental energy source that all speed-related individuals tap into. While it is true that this mythos does provide a rich tapestry for writers to draw upon, it also holds the character back, as most modern-day Flash stories seem to be mired in it (in the comics, Wally West fights crime as the Flash in memoriam of Barry Allen, who died in 1985's Crisis on Infinite Earths series, and is constantly in his shadow). As a result, readers often see the current Flash as nothing more than an extension of the mythos and not as an individual character; as he races through the pages of his monthly comic he drags his back-story behind him. "


That is exactly what a movie about a character most people have never even heard of does not need - a long ass, strings attached, mountainous continuity. A continuity, that, according to the way you want to do things what with just having Barry die at the beginning and then shoe-horning Wally into his suit, isn't even there because Barry is so un-established. Recipe for disater because no one will care.

Let's read on:


Quote:
To combat this, the creative team took a big risk by severing Wally West’s ties to the Flash Legacy. On Justice League Wally is the only superhero to ever bear the identity of the Flash, and this distance from the mythos allows the character the chance to be something that he has never been able to be in his previous incarnations: unique. He doesn’t have to operate in the shadow of two prior incarnations; he is free to live his life without being compared to another hero. And while comic fans have complained about the absence of Jay Garrick and Barry Allen, their omission provides Wally the opportunity to be his own man. "

That's exactly what is needed for the first movie; an interesting character who is self contained that can support his own movie. Wally West does not have that, Barry Allen does, which is why the creators used Barry's story instead of Wally's on JL/JLU.


Quote:
In keeping with the concept of Wally West being the only Flash, it should come as no surprise that, without a mentor in Barry Allen or the presence of the Teen Titans to hone his skills with, the creative team decided to make his character fill the category of “the rookie” in the team’s dynamic. Portrayed as still learning the full range of his abilities and being inexperienced in terms of sacrifice (his bewilderment over Wonder Woman’s banishment in "Paradise Lost," his inability to comprehend leaving a teammate behind in "The Savage Time" or in "Hearts and Minds"), the Flash provides an interesting contrast when compared to his more seasoned teammates, who have been doing the job for years (and, in some cases, for centuries). In truth, the character is more Kid Flash than regular Flash, and the opportunity to see his evolution as a hero sans Barry is a new wrinkle for an old, Silver Age character. In addition, his lack of a mentor provides Wally with a measure of uncertainty when it comes to what his powers are actually capable of—as shown in "Only a Dream," the thought that his powers may one day lock him into super-speed mode permanently is one that will keep him awake at night for years to come."


^ All that fits perfectly with Barry, as he was 24 when he became Flash/got his superpowers and had ZERO experience at what he was doing. Truthfully, Wally West had much more experience at being a superhero than Barry when he became The Flash because he was a superhero most of his whole life! Unlike Barry, he had been a sidekick since he was a kid. He had all this experience, yet anything Barry did still dwarfs Wally. Speaks volumes about the characters, I think. :woot:

So like I said, everyone benefits from a Barry Allen movie or two first. It is self contained, will get people interested in The Flash, and lays the groundwork for the legacy aspects. Plus, it is compatible with the other DC films that are starting at the beginning of their respective characters and would work best for a JLA movie. And you will be able to tell the best Wally story this way. Anything else is a moronic way to go and will **** up the characters, all of them.


^ Read that before you say anything back to me, please.


Exactly. Elements of Allen were there, but Allen has been absent for all this time. I'm not arguing that Barry wasn't influencial to the current Flash line, but he was gone.

But bringing him back was the last piece of the puzzle, he was the only thing missing. The Flash book was like Barry Allen without Barry Allen. Almost like how Smallville is Superman without Superman.

Yeah, and Barry wouldn't have had it to give if not for Jay Garrick, the original Flash.

:pal::lmao:

Man, that's some ********. Jay never "mentored" Barry when he became Flash, in both silver age and post crisis incarnations. Jay lived in some other reality when Barry created The Flash identity. Jay was nothing more than a comic book character. Then you have the post crisis version where Jay doesn't even come out of retirement until after Barry has already been Flash for a while, so even there there's no influence or "mentoring". Whatever reason Barry became The Flash for, it was much more than "I read this comic". :whatever: Jay never passed anything to Barry. Barry Flash and Jay Flash are two different animals, just like Hal and Alan Scott GLs. Show someone unfamiliar with comics a picture of Barry and a picture of Jay and they won't believe they're related. Even if it is inspiration that prompted Barry to make the suit, inspiration and legacy aren't even synonymous of each other.


Even if Barry was created as a new generation era hero he was still based on him. Without Jay Barry probably wouldn't exist in the form we know him as.

In a publication sense, of course not. You want to talk like that, you could say everyone exists because of Superman. The Superman legacy. As a publication material, Hal would not have existed if not for Alan. But like Jay and Barry, those characters are completely unrelated and stand on their own (unlike Wally and Barry and Kyle and Hal).


The point is, so what, it doesn't matter who created the torch, the torch was passed successfully and rightfully

So you want to give Wally credit for "earning" his place as The Flash, yet you don't want to give Barry any credit for creating it in the first place? :wow:


If the torch is passed again it should be passed forward, not backward.

You're a Wally West fan and you're complaining about consistency. :pal: Wally West. The most inconsistent character in comics. The guy who's had a costume change every decade, the guy who was a sidekick/supporting character then a "a-list hero", the guy who was a straight laced republican then a "blue collar" hero, the guy who was a womanizing ***** who's now a faithful husband, Wally West, the guy who was a millionaire then a poor man, Wally West, the guy who had a secret identity, then went public, then gets a secret identity again, Wally West, who's been a mechanic and is now jobless, Wally West, the most inconsistent character in comics.

Really ironic, dude.

If DC hadn't totally blotched Bart's series and character of The Flash, and made something worth a damn out of him as that character to make him at least equal to Barry and Wally, I may very well be in this same position when/if Wally had returned to reclaim The Flash name in 25 years.

The so called legacy aspect they will play up when it's convenient for them, don't you understand? There was no such thing as the "Flash legacy" back in the silver age, before Wally was Flash. Then Wally became Flash, and suddenly everyone with super speed is now a "legacy character". Legacy was never what The Flash was supposed to be about in the first place, so it isn't surprising to me that it didn't work with Bart. They'd beat that horse to death already with Wally West.

I beg to differ. If your logic was so flawless Barry would have been back a long time ago. There was no movements to bring him back

Do you know anything about the writer/editorial history of The Flash? Nearly every writer who wasn't Mark Waid at DC had tried get DC editorial to bring Barry back. Everyone from John Byrne to Alan Burnett.

and the main reason everyone is jumping on it now is the big name behind it, the loads of hype and just the overall apathy I believe most readers have about who is really under the mask.

Perhaps. But it could also be because The Flash book is actually about The Flash again, a guy who runs fast, not about a guy trying to fill some other guy's boots by pretending to be him. See how long the substitute charade lasts with Batman.

When Johns leaves the title, leaves DC or his name begins to fade, we will see when the dust settles where the real 'legacy' of Barry Allen stands

Kinda like what happened when Waid and Johns left Wally. :lmao: Johns isn't the only one who can write Barry. If they cranke dout enough crappy Wally stories at DC for this long, Barry will surely be around for the long haul, Johns or not. When Johns evetually leaves the book (which isn't a "bad" thing, no one can stay on anything forever) Grant Morisson should write Barry. He did a great job with him in Final Crisis, Barry is his favorite character and someone he has wanted to write for a long time. I think he would do well. Or even Darwyn Cooke would be good for Barry. I thought he did great with him in New Frontier.

It sounds to me like you want really badly for Barry to fail because you're a petty Wally fan who can't have his fave character headlining everything with the word "Flash" on it.

Much of Crisis has been rectonned but that doesn't make the story irrelevant and it sure as hell doesn't make Barry's death either.

As a publication/comics history material, none of those stories are irrelevant. But Barry's death and Crisis are more irrelevant to today's stories as stories than the Death of Superman arc from the 90s.

I'm not a comic book historian or anything but I think you could say that Barry's death may have been the death of the Silver Age of comics, or at least been a significant part of it, like Gwen Stacy (Another character that I believe has no right being revived).

That's true, he birthed the silver age, so it only made sense that he would go out with it, back when that meant something.

And since I refuse to believe an age can be reborn or rebirthed, despite how hard DC is trying, Barry Allen should stay dead in my eyes.

No one is trying to "Rebirth" the silver age. You're not going to start seeing self contained stories with flimsy characetrization and plot heavy elements take over the market again, the silver age is dead, Barry Allen and Hal Jordan are not. These are Post Crisis (although I'm beginning to wonder just how much that term is "relevant" to today's comics anymore, what with Crisis being invalidated) or Post, Post Crisis characters. They aren't "silver age' characters anymore. You need to get over that.

You don't agree, whatever, you're opinion, but I can tell you now that you aren't changing mine as I assume I'm probably not changing yours. However, I stick to my guns on this subject, probably more so then any other issue in comic books

Well, I'll keep an open mind, and if you say anything that is good or makes sense to me that I haven't heard before, I will change my way of thinking. You haven't so far, so don't count on it. I'm sure you'll say likewise no matter what I say anyway....


I never thought Jason Todd should have been brought back either and it's mostly been complete crap on his return. As far as I'm concerned they should kill him off again and move the **** on already.

Bucky is different. They brought Bucky back in a pretty radically different role. He didn't come back as Bucky the lovable sidetrack character.

Right, they turned him into the Marvel Wally West. :whatever:

DC is just bringing Barry back in the same role to regress continuity.

"Regression" is a point of view. They brought him back to tell new stories with him,because they can still be told. As long as there is a market/fan base for a particular major character, not a supporting character, and good stories can still be told, I have no problem with comic book resurrections. I want to read good stories about my favorite characters. I want to read good stories, period, which is why I've read all Wally's mid nineties stuff.

I think it's totally dickish to skip out on certain stories, GOOD stories, just because they're not about your favorite version of a character. The people proudly spouting "I don't read Hal's book ever because it's not about Kyle, I only read Kyle's" and are now saying that they won't read Barry's book because he isn't Wally are quite small minded in my opnion. If Barry and Hal fans wanted to read Flash or GL they had Wally and Kyle. That was it.

I grew up with Wally West. I know everything about Wally. I could write a book on him. I also know everything about barry, and could also write a book on him. I'm a Flash MMA fighter, I'm the Farry Allen scholar you said you weren't, I have read nearly everything about both Wally and Barry, and I still prefer Barry as Flash. All the people bashing Barry because they grew up with Wally and know nothing about Barry are giving uninformed opinions. Biased to the nth degree.
 
I guess I'm a true Wally West fan because I usually hated the JL/JLU version. Way too much of a compromise rather than a real character. My favorite bit was predictably when he harnessed the power of the Speed Force and kicked Dark Heart/Brainiac/Lex's ass, since it was the only thing that approached how cool Wally was in the comics.
 
What about when Wally referenced his uncle coming to the museum, or when Michael Rosembaum played Kid Flash in Teen Titans?
 
I agree completely with you. Wally is the Flash. He established himself like this. And all that was "part of Barry's universe" (Like Iris, or Kid Flash) was, in my opinion, to make Wally universe richer.

Writers at DC (like Johns) figured if they couldn't do Barry, so they would turn Wally into Barry.

I mean there is no reason to erase Iris just because Wally is the Flash, I think it is a good idea to keep her, or Jay. I did not like the idea of Kid Flash at all, but i thought that if a kid Flash was needed in the Flash mythos , then let be it. But I think it was because of the whole mythos, not to do "like the old days". Bringing back the Rogues as full villainy was not in order to copy Barry but, IMO, to make stronger the establishment of Wally as Flash.

Writers wanted to do the Rogues for years, Johns wanted to do new Zoom stories for years, but DC (and Mark Waid) had this stupid editorial mandate that "everything old cannot be cool" so anything even remotely Barry or silver agey did not show up. The only reason why Wally got a Zoom is because Johns wanted to do Zoom stories, DC wouldn't let him use the original, so he made a new one.

Wally earned the title. He is Flash. There was no need of bringing back Barry Allen (except if WB pushed it for a film :nono: ). I agree with what you are saying, Wally was established as the Flash. He is the Flash.

Saying that "Wally is the Flash!" over and over again does not make it any more real. The fact (Flash Fact :hehe:) remains that Barry Allen is THE FLASH
, the definitive Flash, has been so, and has been Flash longer than anyone else (his run is still longest, and that was when comics sucked!). Barry is The Flash, Wally is the substitute runner up, he's a close second at best. :hehe:
 
I guess I'm a true Wally West fan because I usually hated the JL/JLU version. Way too much of a compromise rather than a real character. My favorite bit was predictably when he harnessed the power of the Speed Force and kicked Dark Heart/Brainiac/Lex's ass, since it was the only thing that approached how cool Wally was in the comics.

Yes! You are right. You know Wally West. That was the most actual Wally we ever saw on the show. And they put Linda in an episode. But I'm glad someone here actually knows their stuff...
 
What about when Wally referenced his uncle coming to the museum, or when Michael Rosembaum played Kid Flash in Teen Titans?

One reference does not make up for their pathetic portrayal of the character. And Teen Titans is more in line with the Batman than JL/JLU, and Barry and Hal were Flash and GL on The Batman, so that would make sense.
 
You know, people might take you more seriously if you weren't such a jerk about Barry. Weren't you the one who was asking why people can't be happy about getting all the Flashes in good comics earlier? The reason is because people like you feel this need to rub everyone's face in the idea that your preference for the Flash is somehow superior to all others. You may feel that way, but saying it over and over again and bolding and underlining stuff doesn't make it anymore true for those who prefer Wally than saying Wally's the Flash makes it true for you. It's all subjective.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,348
Messages
22,089,848
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"