DarkKnight FTW
Lantern Honor Guard
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2008
- Messages
- 816
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Thought about him, but honestly... he's too good of an actor to bog himself down to a franchise.
Yea, but he did Knight & Day so there's that
Thought about him, but honestly... he's too good of an actor to bog himself down to a franchise.
and Amy Adams isn't?Thought about him, but honestly... he's too good of an actor to bog himself down to a franchise.
????![]()
He's too british.

Jenny Olsen? So pre-op Jimmy?
Oh dear lord, that guy couldn't act his way out of a paper bag. Horribly annoying too.maybe it his sister lol maybe she helps him get a job at the DP
still hope someone like paul dano gets jimmy olsen
![]()
I'm fine with Jenny Olsen. Superman has been done so many times over 70 years that at this point, changing Jimmy into Jenny is not a big deal. Heck , on Elementary Watson is a woman ,and no one seems to complain. This is the 21st century , and while it could be argued that Olsen being a boy/young man is an important aspect of the character , the aspects of the character aside from being a male can still work with a young woman.
Who knows , they may have her looking up to Lois more as a role model and have her still see Clark as a big brother type...or even have a crush on him. Those would be kinda cliqued routes to go but that could be what Synder and Goyer have in mind. Then again, the whole rumor could be BS.
I cant believe that we're actually entertaining the idea that Jimmy has been made into a Jenny.
but he's Clark's roommate, too.
And in terms of the "young cub reporter" not being believable, I've got one word: intern.
There's a lot they're doing right in MOS, but changing a character for the sake of changing a character? Not acceptable. There are no good reasons for it.
Wow, I'm a little surprised there doesn't seem to be more backlash behind the potential "Jenny Olsen" idea. We're talking about a core member of the Superman mythos, a character so drenched into DC Comics history that he had his own comic book (which had major contributions for Jack Kirby). And if we're following the more modern books, Jimmy is not only the young hotshot photographer, but he's Clark's roommate, too. And in terms of the "young cub reporter" not being believable, I've got one word: intern.
There's a lot they're doing right in MOS, but changing a character for the sake of changing a character? Not acceptable. There are no good reasons for it.
Clark "Good ol' boy from a Kansas farm" doesn't strike me as the type that would.Men and women can share apartments.
Yes, they can. But they don't need to be Jimmy Olsen.Women can be interns.
So why not just keep him as the character he is? What's the point of changing him? If you can't think of a good reason why he should stay a guy, then there isn't a very good reason for him to be a woman, either.Eh, I can't think of any good reason why he has to stay a guy either.
I'm 99.99% sure it's just a rumor since the source is IMDb. But as long as the character acts like Jimmy, I don't care what's between their legs.
I think Blake worked as a character, but not really as an interpretation of Robin (any of them). I'm okay with revamping Jimmy a bit, but how does changing his sex do that?But it's also a character that could use a revamp, just look at Nolan's Batman trilogy, John Blake was Robin not Dick Grayson, that's a major change and that worked.
I think Blake worked as a character, but not really as an interpretation of Robin (any of them). I'm okay with revamping Jimmy a bit, but how does changing his sex do that?
That isn't a franchise flick. But a one and done studio film.
Jimmy Olsen is hardly a "core" character. He's the very definition of a secondary character.Wow, I'm a little surprised there doesn't seem to be more backlash behind the potential "Jenny Olsen" idea. We're talking about a core member of the Superman mythos, a character so drenched into DC Comics history that he had his own comic book (which had major contributions for Jack Kirby). And if we're following the more modern books, Jimmy is not only the young hotshot photographer, but he's Clark's roommate, too. And in terms of the "young cub reporter" not being believable, I've got one word: intern.
There's a lot they're doing right in MOS, but changing a character for the sake of changing a character? Not acceptable. There are no good reasons for it.