RetroNaz
Bom Bom Bom
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
- Messages
- 6,973
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I guess my beef with Byrne's Clark wasn't that he should have been depicted as weak or a clutz, but he just seemed too together, too confident. I like Clark humble, although extremely competent. I know he was going for the tougher George Reeves Clark (Reeves Clark was tougher than Byrne's Superman even), but to me he just came off as an ultra-successful yuppie. To me Clark should be socially awkward, very soft and retiring...he should seem humble and constantly be underestimated by the people around him, until he (once again) gets the job done, then they realize they were stupid to underestimate him in the first place. I think you can learn a lot about people from how they treat a guy like Clark.
Just because I don't really want the Chris Reeve Clark for now doesn't mean it wasn't entertaining at times. The one scene with his Clark I really hated was in Superman II after he lost his powers when he got his ass kicked in that diner. When he lost his powers as Clark in "Who Took The Super out of Superman" he kicked Lombards ass and got Lois in the sack. So seeing a powerless Clark as a wimp when he wasn't acting...that pissed me off.
I always thought they sold that angle to show that the sacrifice Clark made had it's consequences.
Probably could have been executed better, or atleast differently - but that's what I'll always remember when I think of the Reeves Clark. He was almost baby like without his powers. Kind of realistic when you put it in context of what was happening on screen.
But I still agree with your post, and don't want to see that version made again.