The Paris Hilton Fiasco Threads Merged

[Drakon]

So much great art in this thread

Is it wrong for me to get a sick pleasure out of these pictures?

See those tears? Those are the tears of sweet justice prying her from her safe haven.

It's a beautiful thing.

Agreed. These pics are probably the best in SHH history. Someone should go back and get all the pics and TiVo them.

 

[Dew k. Mosi]

Yeah someone do that because I don't want to scour all the pages

 

[Spider-Bite]

Yeah someone do that because I don't want to scour all the pages

there is this

then the robo cop one above, and somebody made a close up, and I think there is one that has the words "OWNAGE" written on it.

 

[Spider-Bite]

the video isn't working

 

[Warhammer]

Doesn't...... Work.....

 

[Showtime]

This is the funniest pic seen on the Hype in a loooooooooooooooong time... t: t: t:

That's classic.

 

[jaguarr]

I guess the sheriff is under a federal court oder to reduce overcrowding, and most non violent inmates only serve 10% of their sentence. What's 10% of 23 days?

The jail the Sheriff is responsible for is a county jail, so I'm not exactly sure how much jurisdiction the federal mandate has. At any rate, he was under a DIRECT and EXPLICIT order to NOT release her under house arrest, which is what he did and why he's in trouble over it.

Your post is true. I'm just saying that Jaguar claimed that from his knowledge working in the courts, the judge could have done it if he wanted to, and I merely provided a link showing that's not true.

He was using his history as a way of saying he knows more than I do, therefore I shouldn't argue with him. But I was right. I've given links showing what I stated was true, and others said that what I was saying was untrue, and that I needed to provide links, so I did. but nobody has provided links stating the opposite.

It's sort of a funny little law, actually. California state law requires that inmates get time off their sentences for each day they serve. However, if the inmate shows failure of good behavior, those good behavior days can be added back to the sentence by the judge. Failure to show up for a court date and making the judge send a patrol car to get you isn't good behavior. So, it's sort of a catch 22 because the judge has the discretion to decide whether an inmate's behavior is good enough to qualify them for the good behavior laws that cut days served off of an inmate's sentence. Do things that don't constitute good behavior (like not showing up for court or showing outward contempt for the judge and the ruling) and you don't necessarily get your automatic days off.

Sorry you were unable to comprehend what I was saying in the first place.


At any rate, I'm out for dinner and a movie. Have fun.


jag

 

[bulok]

Just to help lighten this thread up a bit.... this had me laughing my rear off!

These are all great

 

[Memphis Slim]

As far as I know, he didn't. Her sentence is, and always was 45 days. With good behaviour taken into account it's reduced to 23 but her actual SENTENCE that she was given by the judge is still 45 days. If he said that she had to serve out the remainder of her 23 day sentence than he would have actually changed his initial sentence and with good behaviour she could be out in 12 days.

That was strange even when that happened. She wasn't even in jail yet and it got reduced for good behavior???

 

[Memphis Slim]

I think they need to check that sheriff's bank records....see if he's made any "large" deposits lately. He's just a little too concerned about Paris. It kinda' bordered on suspicious to creepy.

 

[Golgo-13]

Yes, her original full term. Instead, of the commuted 23 days.

Wow, out of the frying pan and into the fire. I got a funny feeling she'll attempt suicide.

 

[incubat]

those police car pictures would make an awesome collection

 

[fangrl06]

You know, at first I felt kind of bad for Paris because she's being treated kinda harshly because of her celebrity...

Then I heard about her screaming, "it's not fair" in court.

What a pansy...

 

[Spider-Bite]

The jail the Sheriff is responsible for is a county jail, so I'm not exactly sure how much jurisdiction the federal mandate has. At any rate, he was under a DIRECT and EXPLICIT order to NOT release her under house arrest, which is what he did and why he's in trouble over it.





Sorry you were unable to comprehend what I was saying in the first place.


At any rate, I'm out for dinner and a movie. Have fun.


jag

I was able to comprehend it. I merely disagree with your assessments. And the sheriff is not in trouble. He has the legal right to overrule the authority, and he could do it again, but he said he wont.

 

[Spider-Bite]

That was strange even when that happened. She wasn't even in jail yet and it got reduced for good behavior???

yes that is strange. It shouldn't have been done.

 

[xwolverine2]

 

[Matt]

yes that is strange. It shouldn't have been done.

It wasn't officially cut in half. It was expected that she would be paroled after 23 days (and most minor criminals are paroled after serving half of their sentence due to over population in our prisons). However, by violating the judge's order she has in effect violated her parole, therefore she will serve her entire term.

 

[Matt]

I was able to comprehend it. I merely disagree with your assessments. And the sheriff is not in trouble. He has the legal right to overrule the authority, and he could do it again, but he said he wont.

The sheriff may not be in trouble yet (however with both the district attorney, a judge, and the public pissed at him, there is a good chance you will see his resignation within the next week) but if he does not produce the documents he promised that proves Paris' medical condition he will be.

 

[Arkady Rossovich]

Its sad that the rich and famous have a edge,and are treated differently.I hope she spends a year in jail.

 

[Enriquespy]

So she is still in jail?

 

[Badger]

Um, yes

 

[Enriquespy]

Kudos!!!!

 

[Badger]

 

[Boom]

 

[xwolverine2]

lol thx