Octoberist
point blank
- Joined
- May 13, 2005
- Messages
- 46,465
- Reaction score
- 17
- Points
- 33
is it me, or is the hype on this movie is no-where as big as it should be?

is it me, or is the hype on this movie is no-where as big as it should be?
is it me, or is the hype on this movie is no-where as big as it should be?
her name was never esmeralda... it was "Maddy".
So wht's a good name equivalent to the royal sounding Emeralda? Maddy.... Oh woops that sounds like we barely put effort into it... uh... Tiana. That sounds on the level with Emeralda right?and you really haven't been paying attention to the film if you think the swamp is gross.. some swamps can actually be quite beautiful, and i think they captured it well in the film. Stop being closed minded.
It pains me to say this but after listening to it multiple times Friends On The Other Side is a pretty disappointing villain song.
In the source material it was Emeralda, but I'm guessing that was changed because it's so close to Esmerelda from The Hunch Back film.So wht's a good name equivalent to the royal sounding Emeralda? Maddy.... Oh woops that sounds like we barely put effort into it... uh... Tiana. That sounds on the level with Emeralda right?
I've never seen a swamp that made me feel like, "yes, this belongs as the setting for a magical fairy tale." I just haven't. I've even googled plenty upon your notion of there existing beautiful swamps. I'm sorry, they carry an incompatible atmosphere with me, unless it's a horror film, and from the previews I saw this films setting is none different.
for an artist you have a very close minded view of beauty... aspire all you want, but with that point of view, that's all you will be doing is dreaming.
This also would not be the first time disney changed the name or added a name to a prince/princess from a fairy tale.
The film is also an ADAPTATION. I suggest you learn the meaning.
Eh, name changes happen all the time. Sleeping Beauty's name wasn't Aurora, or Briar Rose. Disney's just doing what they always do, making it their own. And yes, Disney won't have two star characters with the same name.In the source material it was Emeralda, but I'm guessing that was changed because it's so close to Esmerelda from The Hunch Back film.So wht's a good name equivalent to the royal sounding Emeralda? Maddy.... Oh woops that sounds like we barely put effort into it... uh... Tiana. That sounds on the level with Emeralda right?
Considering that this is a fairytale dealing heavily with frogs, I don't see how a swamp wouldn't feel appropriate.I've never seen a swamp that made me feel like, "yes, this belongs as the setting for a magical fairy tale." I just haven't. I've even googled plenty upon your notion of there existing beautiful swamps. I'm sorry, they carry an incompatible atmosphere with me, unless it's a horror film, and from the previews I saw this films setting is none different.
I love the movie.:heart:You didn't watch the Rescuers did you? That's one Disney movie that this reminds me a lot of, especially as that also had a lightning bug as a main character.
Eh, name changes happen all the time. Sleeping Beauty's name wasn't Aurora, or Briar Rose. Disney's just doing what they always do, making it their own.
And yes, Disney won't have two star characters with the same name.
Also this movie is based off of two stories, not just one.
Considering that this is a fairytale dealing heavily with frogs, I don't see how a swamp wouldn't feel appropriate.
And if you only see swamps as settings that only work in horror movies, that's honestly a bit sad.
i don't see how anyone can look at the scene in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies (i believe the 2nd) where they visit Tayadama's swamp hut.. and all the lanterns are lit and its just very enchanting.
Just FYI, the movie's getting very good reviews. Entertainment Weekly's Lisa Schwarzbaum gave it an A rating.