Well the reason I say that is, if you would honestly give ORC a 6 or 7, then you'd probably end up giving RE 6 an 8 or a 9.
You really do have to play this game for yourself. I posted like a week ago about how I was bummed because my flatmate and co-op partner decided not to buy it after the demo? After watching me play Leon's campaign for 3 hours, he went out and bought it the next day. Now we're working our way through them all in co-op and we're having a blast and we are both puzzled where all these complaints are coming from.
Honestly, there isn't a single thing wrong with this game that wasn't either a) Already present earlier in the series or b) was much, much worse in previous titles, and even then, they're hardly game breaking or a big deal.
The main problem, or the polarizing issue, of this game seems to be the content, the focus on action rather than survival horror.
I know! After reading some of these reviews, it's like they played a completely different game.... Or just the demo

I guess they moved the character further to the side of the screen so you could swap hands when aiming but... ugh, after half an hour I feel like puking. Content isn't the problem, with those who scored the game lowly. It's pretty much everything else that tries to hold the game together. Controls, camera, bad gameplay additions, QTE's, story and explosions, explosions, explosions.
Still haven't played it myself, but those are the points reviewers agree on. Even reviews that gave the game good scores mention some of these points.
Well the reason I say that is, if you would honestly give ORC a 6 or 7, then you'd probably end up giving RE 6 an 8 or a 9.
You really do have to play this game for yourself. I posted like a week ago about how I was bummed because my flatmate and co-op partner decided not to buy it after the demo? After watching me play Leon's campaign for 3 hours, he went out and bought it the next day. Now we're working our way through them all in co-op and we're having a blast and we are both puzzled where all these complaints are coming from.
Honestly, there isn't a single thing wrong with this game that wasn't either a) Already present earlier in the series or b) was much, much worse in previous titles, and even then, they're hardly game breaking or a big deal.
The main problem, or the polarizing issue, of this game seems to be the content, the focus on action rather than survival horror.
RE1-3 arent ports. They are the PS1 originals. RE 4 is the HD remaster that was released last year and 5 and 6 of course are the newer ones from this genIs Resident Evil:Anthology worth getting? I also wonder if the games included are quality ports in graphics, gameplay, etc. Thoughts?
RE1-3 arent ports. They are the PS1 originals. RE 4 is the HD remaster that was released last year and 5 and 6 of course are the newer ones from this gen
I dont have it as I already own RE1-4 on PSN, but if you are a fan of the series and dont own the games, then yeah. Its only $30 more than RE6. Be warned that I personally dont think RE 1-3 hold up as well today. Controls are pretty bad and graphics dont look that great on an HDTV. But if you can get past that, then go for itOk. I stand corrected, but is the set worth buying?