The fact that Peter wanting to be an Avenger qualifies as a character arc doesn't automatically make it a good one, or one that necessitates being explored over the entirety of a non-Avengers solo Spidey film.
Of corse it's natural for Peter to want to be an Avenger (or "continue" being an Avenger since he technically already fought alongside a version of the group), but is that something worth having so much focus and weight in his first MCU solo outing? Other than for the obvious business reasons.
I also agree that whole "it's not the suit that makes the man" lesson is something that is also silly/unnecessary for Spider-man to have, as well as being especially redundant coming from Tony Stark, who himself spent an entire film learning the same lesson.
Exactly. It should have been a sub-plot not his main motivation throughout the entire movie. This movie should have been about an established Spider-Man with a good grasp of his powers (since he's had them for nine months) finding his place in this huge universe. Does he want to be like the Avengers? Or does he want to go his own path? Does he gravitate towards Stark or Rogers? What kind of hero does he want to be? That's what it initially seemed like we were getting per Feige's 2015 comments.
Instead we got Spider-kid: Homecoming: Uncle Tony pls let me be an Avengerr! And a pseudo origin story literally nobody wanted or asked for.
Eh, you guys are kinda winning me over.
Reason I can't fully agree is because I want to see what is/isn't in the movie first. This has one of the most skewed marketing campaigns of any CBM when you think about it. They clearly have marketing preference to the Tony/Avengers side of things than the other sides, so who knows if the film's entirely about that?
I'll fully agree on the suit though. And it's redundant for other reasons too (i.e. symbiote).