The State of the Hype.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noir
  • Start date Start date
I was an annoying imature noob:yay:

That's actually my first name on the Hype.


And I have been banned before{under usernames which have thankly been deleted}.
 
I was an annoying imature noob:yay:

That's actually my first name on the Hype.


And I have been banned before{under usernames which have thankly been deleted}.

Cool.

I was a noob once....I have only ever had this name though.
 
Were my posts in this thread seriously deleted?

Way to prove my point Mods :up:

I said nothing inflammatory about C. Lee or Morg. I did not insult them on a personal level. I simply critiqued their moderating. If the moderators are so above criticism that they feel the need to delete any post slightly critical of a moderator we can see what a big problem there is on this site.
 
Were my posts in this thread seriously deleted?

Way to prove my point Mods :up:

I said nothing inflammatory about C. Lee or Morg. I did not insult them on a personal level. I simply critiqued their moderating. If the moderators are so above criticism that they feel the need to delete any post slightly critical of a moderator we can see what a big problem there is on this site.
Seriously?
I saw and read your post about C.Lee and Morg and you were right, it wasn't insulting or inflammatory.
I feel like we're in Burma now.
 
Seriously?
I saw and read your post about C.Lee and Morg and you were right, it wasn't insulting or inflammatory.
I feel like we're in Burma now.

I'm waiting for the sack to be shoved over my head. :csad:
 
You should take this to the press, or Hype News.
 
I second that.


I'd be curious too if I were you. It'd be nice to get a little bit of explanation.

Like that'll ever happen. The Forbidden Site is looking better and better each day. Perhaps it is time for ol' Matt to jump ship.
 
Any figure in authority is going to be subject to criticism, either in public or in private.....
 
Seriously?
I saw and read your post about C.Lee and Morg and you were right, it wasn't insulting or inflammatory.
I feel like we're in Burma now.

We're gonna need Matt to die under interrogation by the Mod's in order to keep up with Burma. :o

jag
 
58bc164c372c051edb4974ea57cf3416.gif

That's an awesome pic, do you got anymore?
 
Were my posts in this thread seriously deleted?

Way to prove my point Mods :up:

I said nothing inflammatory about C. Lee or Morg. I did not insult them on a personal level. I simply critiqued their moderating. If the moderators are so above criticism that they feel the need to delete any post slightly critical of a moderator we can see what a big problem there is on this site.


THIS is the state of the Hype.
The ownwership/management seems to be getting more and more petty and childish, with an accurate, but nonetheless ignoble "Hey, I have the power. There's nothing you can say or do, so if you don't like it, go to another site." - Attitude.

I've been told that I'll be banned just for even making an observation about a certain person, not even insults, I can't even talk about him. You can talk about any other poster, people can say that I'm "a ******", that I'm "overrated", that I'm arrogant, that I'm going to Hell, that I'm a deviant, that I'm clueless, whatever.
You can talk about the president of the united states, or make observations about Stan Lee, or Bendis, or JAL, but you can't talk about this person.

And the ellesspee thing has now escalated to comical proportions...
First they censor it.........then they uncensor it but say you can't post links to it..........then they censor it again.........then they uncensor it, BUT, yeah, you can post the name of it, BUT, if you do, you're banned.

Why not just uncensor the F word, since you're obviously just waiting to ban people for saying something that they are allowed to say?

Meanwhile, there's a whole thread about other sites where Hypesters post, and lo and behold, there are sites named that have just as much "adult" content as this one that's been singled out.

Vindictive, petty children. :whatever:


People act like Louis XIV here, it's really pathetic. It's like centuries ago where you'd be flayed for drawing a caricature of the King.
They should just grow up and everyone would enjoy the site more.
There's such a sour "Us vs. You" tone and that doesn't just appear spontaneously in a vacuum.

You don't see such criticism at The Site That Must Not Be Named, if anything you see gushing love-fests, and respect for the decisions that are made.

This "using your Mod power to delete any criticism" is pathetic. :o
 
I think Hype is Vermont.


Yeah, that's all I've got to say.
since I got temp banned last time I tackled the subject of the state of Hype.
 
Like that'll ever happen. The Forbidden Site is looking better and better each day. Perhaps it is time for ol' Matt to jump ship.
You can't. You're one of the better posters here and besides... you can't abandon Survivor when it's in its early stage of conception.

Any figure in authority is going to be subject to criticism, either in public or in private.....
Not at certain places, I guess.

We're gonna need Matt to die under interrogation by the Mod's in order to keep up with Burma. :o

jag
Matt will be a martyr. :csad:

THIS is the state of the Hype.
The ownwership/management seems to be getting more and more petty and childish, with an accurate, but nonetheless ignoble "Hey, I have the power. There's nothing you can say or do, so if you don't like it, go to another site." - Attitude.

I've been told that I'll be banned just for even making an observation about a certain person, not even insults, I can't even talk about him. You can talk about any other poster, people can say that I'm "a ******", that I'm "overrated", that I'm arrogant, that I'm going to Hell, that I'm a deviant, that I'm clueless, whatever.
You can talk about the president of the united states, or make observations about Stan Lee, or Bendis, or JAL, but you can't talk about this person.

And the ellesspee thing has now escalated to comical proportions...
First they censor it.........then they uncensor it but say you can't post links to it..........then they censor it again.........then they uncensor it, BUT, yeah, you can post the name of it, BUT, if you do, you're banned.

Why not just uncensor the F word, since you're obviously just waiting to ban people for saying something that they are allowed to say?

Meanwhile, there's a whole thread about other sites where Hypesters post, and lo and behold, there are sites named that have just as much "adult" content as this one that's been singled out.

Vindictive, petty children. :whatever:


People act like Louis XIV here, it's really pathetic. It's like centuries ago where you'd be flayed for drawing a caricature of the King.
They should just grow up and everyone would enjoy the site more.
There's such a sour "Us vs. You" tone and that doesn't just appear spontaneously in a vacuum.

You don't see such criticism at The Site That Must Not Be Named, if anything you see gushing love-fests, and respect for the decisions that are made.

This "using your Mod power to delete any criticism" is pathetic. :o
BANNED! :csad:

But seriously, I get your point.
 
THIS is the state of the Hype.
The ownwership/management seems to be getting more and more petty and childish, with an accurate, but nonetheless ignoble "Hey, I have the power. There's nothing you can say or do, so if you don't like it, go to another site." - Attitude.

I've been told that I'll be banned just for even making an observation about a certain person, not even insults, I can't even talk about him. You can talk about any other poster, people can say that I'm "a ******", that I'm "overrated", that I'm arrogant, that I'm going to Hell, that I'm a deviant, that I'm clueless, whatever.
You can talk about the president of the united states, or make observations about Stan Lee, or Bendis, or JAL, but you can't talk about this person.

And the ellesspee thing has now escalated to comical proportions...
First they censor it.........then they uncensor it but say you can't post links to it..........then they censor it again.........then they uncensor it, BUT, yeah, you can post the name of it, BUT, if you do, you're banned.

Why not just uncensor the F word, since you're obviously just waiting to ban people for saying something that they are allowed to say?

Meanwhile, there's a whole thread about other sites where Hypesters post, and lo and behold, there are sites named that have just as much "adult" content as this one that's been singled out.

Vindictive, petty children. :whatever:


People act like Louis XIV here, it's really pathetic. It's like centuries ago where you'd be flayed for drawing a caricature of the King.
They should just grow up and everyone would enjoy the site more.
There's such a sour "Us vs. You" tone and that doesn't just appear spontaneously in a vacuum.

You don't see such criticism at The Site That Must Not Be Named, if anything you see gushing love-fests, and respect for the decisions that are made.

This "using your Mod power to delete any criticism" is pathetic. :o

RichardNixonFarewell.jpg
 
I'd like things to get a little more even handed around here, but I think its an issue of finding quality people.....someone who won't let the mod-ship go to their head.....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,304
Messages
22,082,683
Members
45,882
Latest member
Charles Xavier
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"