They know it won't that is why they wrangled RDJ back and likely have Evans appear as a Cap in another universe. They literally did nothing to build up Sam Wilson's Avenger team. I will likely hate Sam's version because his sidekick is lame and I don't want to see that 4ft tall Widow ever again.You think slapping the Name Avengers is going make you a billionaire. Good luck with that
Agatha All Along makes sense in the context of WandaVision. Born Again and First Steps are just to differentiate from previous adaptations.The Avengers (they should have removed the The)
Avengers Assemble (Uk title)
The Incredible Hulk (I remember this sounded a bit corny in 2008)
Captain America: The First Avenger (subtitle for the first film)
Spider-Man: Homecoming (subtitle for the first film)
The Marvels (Captain Marvel 2 is a better title and they even used it for other countries)
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (long subtitle for the first film)
The Fantastic 4: First Steps (subtitle for the first film, no need for the The)
Thunderbolts* (the only movie I know that uses an asterisk in the title)
Marvel Studios' movie titles are a mess. I don't care if the titles would have been similar to past movies (Spider-Man, Fantastic 4, Hulk). Its inconsistent as a whole especially if you read them in a list. Shang-Chi and Captain America didn't have a big budget movie before the Mcu, for them to add those extra words.
She Hulk: Attorney-at-Law, Secret Invasion, Agatha all Along and Daredevil: Born Again could have also been just She Hulk, Nick Fury, Agatha Harkness and Daredevil as well.
This feels akin to when Birds of Prey and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn went to simply just being called Birds of Prey as a desperate attempt to get more people into the theater. But again, it shouldn't be necessary if this movie is apparently doing well at the box office- despite it coming in under Captain America: Brave New World, right?It isn't even Monday yet and Marvel is already trying to spoil the meaning of the asterisk
I've read their explanation. But i prefer these titles to be direct and simple. Not sure why someone had to react "confused" to that.Agatha All Along makes sense in the context of WandaVision. Born Again and First Steps are just to differentiate from previous adaptations.
The long title for that movie was just not an unnecessary mess.This feels akin to when Birds of Prey and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn went to simply just being called Birds of Prey as a desperate attempt to get more people into the theater. But again, it shouldn't be necessary if this movie is apparently doing well at the box office- despite it coming in under Captain America: Brave New World, right?
The movie's still called Thunderbolts*.Or just call it New Avengers from the start.
Who... cares?The Avengers (they should have removed the The)
Avengers Assemble (Uk title)
The Incredible Hulk (I remember this sounded a bit corny in 2008)
Captain America: The First Avenger (subtitle for the first film)
Spider-Man: Homecoming (subtitle for the first film)
The Marvels (Captain Marvel 2 is a better title and they even used it for other countries)
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (long subtitle for the first film)
The Fantastic 4: First Steps (subtitle for the first film, no need for the The)
Thunderbolts* (the only movie I know that uses an asterisk in the title)
Marvel Studios' movie titles are a mess. I don't care if the titles would have been similar to past movies (Spider-Man, Fantastic 4, Hulk). Its inconsistent as a whole especially if you read them in a list. Shang-Chi and Captain America didn't have a big budget movie before the Mcu, for them to add those extra words.
She Hulk: Attorney-at-Law, Secret Invasion, Agatha all Along and Daredevil: Born Again could have also been just She Hulk, Nick Fury, Agatha Harkness and Daredevil as well.
Obviously using Avengers in a movie title for 3 consecutive years is a bit over kill for the general public.I don't think I understand what exactly the name change spoils. Did we not know they're gonna be a team going in? I'm confused.
I prefer Thunderbolts. I'm gonna keep calling them Thunderbolts.![]()
It spoils... the... ending of the movie?I don't think I understand what exactly the name change spoils. Did we not know they're gonna be a team going in? I'm confused.
![]()
YEP!It spoils... the... ending of the movie?
All the more reason to let them keep the name they picked for themselves (kind of).Obviously using Avengers in a movie title for 3 consecutive years is a bit over kill for the general public.
Since this movie, doesn't have an A-list Marvel superhero (Iron Man, Spider-Man, Thor, Captain America), they weren't probably ready to use that title prior to its release.
I'm curious if they are still going to call it Thunderbolts* in streaming and physical media.
The change in name didn't feel important to me at all. Guess I'll just continue to not get it.It spoils... the... ending of the movie?
Disagree on Red Guardian. He's important to Yelena's personal story.They could have come up with a more interesting line up for that. This movie was really a Yelena movie, with Bob getting the next focus as he was the main threat.
The rest are replaceable. They could have replaced Red Guardian with Iron Maiden (Melina). Tigra and Wonder Man could have been used instead of Walker and Ghost, since those two weren't really developed anyway. Bucky's role here is a downgrade from Winter Soldier, Civil War and his own show.