The TIH & TDK Effect: A Civil Debate

chosen1

Sidekick
Joined
May 10, 2005
Messages
2,091
Reaction score
0
Points
31
So i guess its going to be Man of Steel 2009
 
hopefully, if all goes according to plan.
 
I certainly wouldn't mind if it was, but then, Singer's really hasn't done anything to follow in Nolan's footsteps yet.
 
"The Dark Knight" sounds so much better than "Escalation".
 
at the moment, shazam is on imdb slated for 2007 but thats not a def, wonder woman is a possibility too, if the execs ever pass on whedon's script.
 
i don't think shazam is WB.... the movie rights went to somebody else. Don't forget, WB always has Harry Potter to be a tent pole though.
 
Cyclops3235 said:
wait, if this 09, and bats 08, what is dx have in 07?????

nothing :(.

it should've been Wonder Woman, but then Whedon is taking his sweet time. he said that studio has read his script and is arranging for a meeting, but even IF they liked his script and started casting and pre-prod the following day its too late to get this out by 2007, certainly not by the summer, and would feel totally rushed if they forced it for the winter release.
 
I would save The Man of Steel title for a future franchise re-start. It's too good for a SR sequel.
 
Well, if the villian of the movie is Braniac, then I'm hoping for the title to be The Last Son Of Krypton. If it was Metallo, then The Man Of Steel. Please, no Zod!!
 
Vile.47 said:
Well, if the villian of the movie is Braniac, then I'm hoping for the title to be The Last Son Of Krypton. If it was Metallo, then The Man Of Steel. Please, no Zod!!

Wow...that sounds good. Maybe use both in the subsequent sequels.
 
Vile.47 said:
Well, if the villian of the movie is Braniac, then I'm hoping for the title to be The Last Son Of Krypton. If it was Metallo, then The Man Of Steel. Please, no Zod!!

My friend I like your style, I also think that "The Man Of Tomorrow" could work well for either.
 
To steal... er I mean HOMAGE :cwink: from JcDc's thread, I want to make a new poll but without Ratner as the other choice.

hehehe. So just imagine that Nolan for some reason was available to do it, would you want him to or continue with singer?
:yay:

vote!
 
Just because Nolan did a great job with Begins it doesnt mean he'd do a good Superman movie.
 
i wanna see what Nolan's re-imagining would look like first.

as i've said i'm not a real fan of the term "re-imagining"
 
Dark_Lord said:
Just because Nolan did a great job with Begins it doesnt mean he'd do a good Superman movie.

Thats the same way I felt about Tim Burton directing a Superman movie like he was suppose to some years back. He did an excellent job with Batman and Batman Returns but I don't think he would've done a good job with Superman.
 
No, he would have Superman flying a plane because aliens and people flying don't exist in the real world :woot: Seriously, I don't think he's suited for Superman. I would rather have Peter Jackson or Singer of course. :yay:
 
Dark_Lord said:
Just because Nolan did a great job with Begins it doesnt mean he'd do a good Superman movie.

Whatt? :huh:

The quality of the story is determined by the quality of the story teller, and nothing else. It could be a story about a piece of poo (this does exist. It's some french film.) and if the story teller is good, he can keep you interested and tell a good story. So I don't see exactly how Nolan, a good story teller, and someone who respects the comics, wouldn't make a good supey movie.

INWT

ISWDT
 
I Am The Knight said:
No, he would have Superman flying a plane because aliens and people flying don't exist in the real world :woot: Seriously, I don't think he's suited for Superman. I would rather have Peter Jackson or Singer of course. :yay:

Golly a peter jackson superman might be swell.

Singer again? He'll have Superman stupidly walk up to lex and get manhandled and shot in the eye and then fly around crying all day but if that's what people want... who am i to fiddle on the roof about it...
 
Nolan did an excelent job with Batman, so this is a no brainer:

NOLAN
 
Singer. I liked Singer and for some reason I don't think that Nolan would do as well with Superman as he did with Batman.
 
Nolan is one my top three favorite directors, the others being Michael Mann and Oliver Stone. That being said, he is all wrong for Superman. Nolan loves doing gritty, dark, compelling psychological thrillers. He's perfect for Batman, all wrong for Supes. Besides, he hates Superman.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"