lixdexia
Avenger
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2006
- Messages
- 27,952
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
1- since we are in agreement here #1 shall be henceforth disregarded1 - Food is great. No arguments there.
2 - Being eco-friendly means that you're a *****e, plus the common opinion towards environmentalism is skewed towards keeping the planet the same, which in itself does not follow the actual meaning of the term "eco-friendly".
3 - Here you go, sacrificing awesome explosions and wreckage for the safety of others.
4 - I don't know what you look like, but I doubt anyone wants to see you in a red unitard.
5 - You'd ally yourself with corporations (which everyone knows are evil) and yet still try to call yourself a hero? Do you think you can do that? Micheal Jordan only barely pulled it off. Are you saying you're better than Micheal Jordan?
2- calling people a *****e makes you a *****e. since this label is impossible to escape i'm not going to concern myself with it. similarly i won't concern myself with the common opinion of what's "eco-friendly". again, to measure the full impact studies would need to be done. i assume i would run through several pairs of shoes and my food consumption would skyrocket, the cost of these things to need to be measured to know the full impact.
3- i'm not michael bay. you want explosions go talk to spoons
4- that one is just for me, **** what anyone else wants. pretty sure the folks getting saved from an oncoming train are going to say thank you to the guy who saved them no matter what he's wearing
5- michael jordan is sub-human, so yes. yes i am saying exactly that. literally 85-90% of all people around the world are better than michael jordan.