To each his own. I find the OTT nature of wrestling to be much more in my wheelhouse - if anything, I think that having the freedom to watch it as I have time fits my schedule much better. But that also may just be the way we differ in how we consume our entertainment. Another thing driving my disinterest in WWE's product is how much weekly content they actually produce at this point. Even if the shows were good, 3 hours of Raw & 2 hours of Smackdown every week is bordering on overkill.
When you say OTT are you talking about presentation or match style? As I was meaning the type of 8 head drops = 8 kick outs followed by "This is wrestling" chants that pervades through a lot of Indie wrestling. To me that is not good wrestling.
And as for hoping WWE & Reigns fail, I can understand the reasons behind it. I'd just rather spend my time enjoying wrestling, that's all. Even if ROH, NJPW or Lucha Underground can't quite reach the heights WWE could, they do better with what they've already got and I'd much rather support a product like that.
That's the issue for me though, I simply don't care much for those promotions, the few wrestlers left I actually like are in WWE so it's not the same option for me. I don't actually watch any wrestling now, I just like to hear of WWE shows getting crapped on as I feel they deserve it, I've felt that way pretty much since Punk left.
As you've said, it's pretty clear that Vince is going to run his company the way he wants. And that's fine, I'll just choose to ignore his company and stop saying anything at all about it. In this day & age where people can voice their opinion in so many ways, if they just stopped talking about WWE, things would change in a hurry.
I guess I'm having ym cake and eating it then lol, as I stopped watching and still make comments in this thread on the hideous booking that is evident without even watching single frame of WWE television.
I cannot argue your point. Sting and Taker really is the match to be made. I will totally admit that I have a bias too, because even though Taker/Sting is the biggest match to make, I'd hate to see Sting lose his first match at Mania.
I think there are a few reasons for the Sting/HHH match being made.
1) Taker's health and age combined with Sting's. Both men are older and have lingering issues. WWE has no idea what they'll get with the match. I think they want to gauge where both men are at physically and don't want a stinker. HHH can carry Sting to a better match at this point.
2) Like you pointed out, Sting gets a win in his debut, Taker gets a win back. Both men get to wrestle each other on wins in their home state of Texas.
3) I'm just guessing, but I really think WWE wants to familiarize Sting with WWE audience. The audience is so much younger these days with no connection to Sting. Having Sting face HHH gives him a chance build an emotional investment with the audience, given HHH's role as a heel. Sting fighting Taker would likely result in Stinger getting mostly boos. I think atmosphere will be much more intense and split next year.
4) HHH gets to live out his Ric Flair fantasy once again. Facing and getting pinned by Sting will probably be a cool moment for him. And of course he gets a little ego boost from it by being Sting's first opponent and can tell this silly I am the WWE narrative.
I can absolutely see why some fans have no desire to see Sting/HHH. It makes sense and Taker and Sting is the dream match people want to see. But WWE has some good reasons behind it and Sting himself has said he would like to wrestle HHH. Once again, I think WWE is using the wrong narrative to the build, as Taker will always be seen as the WWE, not HHH.
Despite the build, I'm sure the spectacle and match itself will be great. In a lot ways it reminds me of Hogan vs. Rock. The story and build up to the match was wrong, as everyone knows it should have been Austin vs. Hulk, but the Mania moment itself was still great to see and Rock's style probably was better suited to Hulk.
Your 4 points are all accurate, in particular Triple H wanting to add to his Ric Flair fantasy catalog.

I think Sting needing that win and getting established with the modern WWE fanbase is smart and Triple H is the only heel they could really do it with given his age and era spanning career, not to mention the fact he can eat the loss and it wont matter.
However it's just a flat out boring match to me, Triple H's sole contribution in the ring over the last decade was putting Bryan over last year, other than that he's been a complete cancer to everyone he's worked with and I find him dull as dishwater. I also don't think the crowd will be like they were with Hulk and Rock, as Hogan was THE ultimate WWE Icon coming home and Rock was the biggest face in the company at the time, it was truly a battle of generations. This is Sting from another era and company vs the 4th main star from an era that ended 15 years ago who barely works as a part timer this year.
This is why this Mania card is arguably the worst ever, there have been worse cards overall but that has been down to the lack of talent on the roster at the time.
This roster is full of great talent but they are all in a cluster**** ladder match while two 55 year olds who wrestle 1 match a year, a 45 year old COO who works about 3 times a year and a rookie vs a 4 times a year guy, hog the main events. Disgusting and disheartening IMO.
The Rise and Fall of WWE
[YT]20s8u_iPm-w[/YT]
This is magnificent
This is brilliant, love the placement of Bryan, Reigns and Punk.