Paroxysm
Superhero
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2009
- Messages
- 8,070
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Well to be fair in 2000 we heard that computers were going to be messed up causing economic devestation if we don't fix it. than I heard we were going to fix it. than I heard we fixed it but there will still be a few glitches. than there were a few glitches.
Basiclly our computers needed to be updated, so we updated them.
And one could easily argue that geo magnetic reversals are pretty signifigant cycles.
Read this.......all of it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2000_problem#Cost
The opposing view of Y2K made these observations.
* The lack of Y2K-related problems in schools, many of which undertook little or no remediation effort. By September 1, 1999 only 28 percent of US schools had achieved compliance for mission critical systems, and a government report predicted that "Y2K failures could very well plague the computers used by schools to manage payrolls, student records, online curricula, and building safety systems".[32]
* The lack of Y2K-related problems in an estimated 1.5 million small businesses that undertook no remediation effort. On 3 January 2000 (the first weekday of the year) the Small Business Administration received an estimated 40 calls from businesses with computer problems, similar to the average. None of the problems were critical.[33]
* The lack of Y2K-related problems in countries such as Italy, which undertook a far more limited remediation effort than the United States. In an October 22, 1999, report, a US Senate Committee expressed concern about safe travel outside of the United States. The report stated that overseas public transit systems were considered vulnerable because many did not have an aggressive response plan in place for any problems. Internationally, the report singled out Italy, China and Russia as poorly prepared. The Australian government evacuated all but three embassy staff from Russia.[34] None of these countries experienced any Y2K problems regarded as worth reporting.[35]
* The absence of Y2K-related problems occurring before January 1, 2000, even though the 2000 financial year commenced in 1999 in many jurisdictions, and a wide range of forward-looking calculations involved dates in 2000 and later years. Estimates undertaken in the leadup to 2000 suggested that around 25% of all problems should have occurred before 2000.[36] Critics of large-scale remediation argued, during 1999, that the absence of significant problems, even in systems that had not been rendered compliant, suggested that the scale of the problem had been severely overestimated.[37]