The Caped Knight
Shield Avenger
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2004
- Messages
- 36,569
- Reaction score
- 7,517
- Points
- 103
So this wouldn't have worked?:
![]()
I think it looks great. I know its an old argument but it relates to this thread.
So then would you have like to have seen the classic BUMBLEBEE
![]()
Instead of what we got in the movie?
![]()
Troll bait, but I'll bite.
I'd have preferred to see movie bumblebee with: 1) More sheet metal on the exterior to provide volume and 2) A discernible face of some sort or just have his battle mask on the whole time.
Battle mask was 100 times better than his face.
You know, I would like to get an ILM rendition before I conclude that this wouldn't work on film.![]()
If you really think about it ... These robots look Way Cooler than the Cartoon.
I mean the animation for the cartoon was 1984ish animation. CGI is animation for our times, and it's a lot more advanced in every way; This isn't news to anyone reading this. What I'm getting at is the 'realism' of these robots really helps sell the idea even better than the cartoon could.
I mean, they looked like Robots... real robots - I heard a lot of complaining at first when people began to see what the transformers would look like for the film, and mostly I think the complaining was mostly over these transformers looking different from the cartoon - let's face it, sometimes the toys looked different from what was Drawn on screen back then.
I don't think I've seen enough said about how good of a job the CGI team did in bringing the transformers to life - and I mean really "to life".
With a sequel (or two, or three, or four), and more screen time for this new Artistic Version of what these transformers look like, I think people will come to appreciate these even more than the cartoon version, and simply view the cartoon as the building blocks of one Cool ass movie franchise.
Well you should talk to Hasbro because they're the ones who pushed for new and different designs. You know, just like they've been doing for 20 some years now.The mass audience doesn't give a crap, they are going to love Michael Bay garbage no matter what designs they used. Did they care about the fish lips? Do they care about robot designs? Nope, just watch them fight and it doesn't matter to the audience except those of us who care about the characters.
The designs in the cartoon were mathematically figured out in terms of their transformability. While that's nice to look at it may not be able to Transform realistically.
I love all the bot designs still a little iffy about SS, but hey it worked. Love to see earth-mode Megatron look more G1-ish in the future.
I don't see why Megatron couldn't be a tank like Devastator. Then the designers might have been able to incorporate an arm cannon better.
His role in the plot? The only thing I see it really interfering with is how he could get from Hoover Dam to LA without being a space jet.Because him being a tank conflicts with his role in the plot.
Megs being a tank was cool in Transformers: Armada, btw.
His role in the plot? The only thing I see it really interfering with is how he could get from Hoover Dam to LA without being a space jet.
I understand that. I just think that the writers could have found way for him to copy a vehicle. I mean, it's not like logic dictates the movie anyway.He crash landed in the Arctic Circle.