• Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version.

Timeline of Wonder Woman's Killings, Post-Crisis (First Draft)

DK was an amazingly good movie considering how many things in it were so incredibly dumb.
 
I liked when Batman became Daredevil. :dry:
 
The Joker made up for all of them.
There was that.
Also, aside from the parts where Bale's voice was too over-the-top and gravelly ("WHERE IS HE?!"), and his killing of Two-Face, his Batman is pretty damn good.
 
I'd definitely like him to tone his voice down, but what I'd really kill for would be to see more detective work and Bruce using (what should be) his great intelligence, instead of relying on Lucius to always do the thinking for him. We got a couple hints of that in TDK, but it still wasn't nearly enough.
 
I was okay with Batman. If the movies were built on the strength of Nolan's Batman, though, they'd crash and burn. Instead, Begins was built on the strength of Bruce Wayne's journey to become Batman and on what Batman is all about, which Nolan nailed far better than he portrayed the actual physical Batman on screen. DK was about the concept of heroism and what it means in a world as corrupt and anarchic as Gotham, and Nolan's agent of anarchy is probably the most compelling character to appear on film in our generation, so Batman was practically an afterthought in that context.
 
Easily overshadowed by the awesomeness of Ledger's Joker. Pill popping jerk that he was. :o
 
Yeah, he's the agent of anarchy I was talking about, in case that wasn't clear.
 
Joker also got to kill Spawn in TDK. :o
 
But he failed to kill Bat-Manuel.
 
That's because he wears bulletproof eyeliner.
 
Personally I like to believe bats didnt go to kill Harvey but that it was an accident to the greatest degree.
 
That's what I think. If he actually wanted to push Harvey over the side, why would he risk also killing Jim Jr.?
 
I honestly think he wasn't really thinking about it at the time. The only thing on his mind was probably "save the boy."
 
Take it back! That is too Spike.
 
...The part where Two-Face had a gun and Gordon's kid would have been the perfect time to use a batarang. :huh:


1)Last time I checked his Batarangs were'nt that big

2)What if that had made the gun accidentaly go off
 
...What about football tackling him at Mach 7? You'd think that that might make the gun accidentally go off, too. Although I guess it wouldn't technically be an accident considering that it is in fact what Harvey is trying to do. v:Ov

The fact is that if the writers wanted to have the batarangs disarm Harvey at that precise moment, then the batarangs would have disarmed Harvey. The same way that they wanted the football tackle to work, and that's the reason that it worked.
 
Instead of knocking the gun off the batarang could have pierced the back of Two-Faces hand. I'm no doctor, but I think opening a clenched hand would be a natural involuntary reaction to that. And as far as I know it would be consistent with the accuracy Batman has been shown to have both in the movies and comics.
 
...What about football tackling him at Mach 7? You'd think that that might make the gun accidentally go off, too. Although I guess it wouldn't technically be an accident considering that it is in fact what Harvey is trying to do. v:Ov

The fact is that if the writers wanted to have the batarangs disarm Harvey at that precise moment, then the batarangs would have disarmed Harvey. The same way that they wanted the football tackle to work, and that's the reason that it worked.
My faith in common sense is apparently not in vain. :up:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"