Your points aren't going to get across because you're actually basing them on the evidence provided in the film instead of using fanboy rationalization and speculation. I applaud you for using erudition, but I fear that true critical thought is useless here. The Guard has constructed his argument using speculation and inferences in to things that are just not in the film. You can't budge stubborn fanboyism, even with rationality and knowledge.That, yes, but more that nothing in the film is actually affected by these plot points. If the romance was absent, what would be different? Nothing. If Sam wasn't struggling to find his place, what would be different? Maybe something, but I can't tell you what. It's not like he had the option to say "I'm not playing this game any more."
Now, you might say that Sam didn't affect the story, but the story affected Sam. Meh. Sam said he didn't want to help, but then later decided he did want to help. There's just not much there to make that meaningful or interesting. You only believe he had this change of heart because the film tells you. It doesn't show you.
Dude, I'm not talking about one type of fanboy being better than another. I'm discouraging fanboyism in favor of straight critical analysis.is this because only knowledgeable fanboys opinions count??
I agree with a lot of points you make in other posts, especially about the incomplete and empty subplots like the one with the Fallen going on TV. Bay forgot about that part in the next 2 minutes.That, yes, but more that nothing in the film is actually affected by these plot points. If the romance was absent, what would be different? Nothing. If Sam wasn't struggling to find his place, what would be different? Maybe something, but I can't tell you what. It's not like he had the option to say "I'm not playing this game any more."
Now, you might say that Sam didn't affect the story, but the story affected Sam. Meh. Sam said he didn't want to help, but then later decided he did want to help. There's just not much there to make that meaningful or interesting. You only believe he had this change of heart because the film tells you. It doesn't show you.
Dude, I'm not talking about one type of fanboy being better than another. I'm discouraging fanboyism in favor of straight critical analysis.
I agree on everything but the part in bold. They do have some chemistry, but she is so SUPER HOT and he is such a dork, that i cant buy it so easily. Its easier for me to buy huge alien robots transforming into carsThe romance, as an arc, doesn't work but the moments do work because of Shia and Megan. The romance is there for marketing and from a story point, to prove Mikaela's worth.
As she says, look at what she goes through. And honestly, I like it because their bond is shaped by these experiences in the two films with these alien wars. That's something only they share so I can buy the relationship and the growth between films.
Yes, you definitely have to make some assumptions to fill in the two years but because Shia and Megan play it really, really well, it works, despite the fact you don't need it and the writers didn't do the actors any favors by not giving them much to work with.
For some people, like me, it works only because of Shia and Megan's chemistry.
t:

I agree on everything but the part in bold. They do have some chemistry, but she is so SUPER HOT and he is such a dork, that i cant buy it so easily. Its easier for me to buy huge alien robots transforming into carst:
![]()
have you seen Christina Aguileras husband?? he looks like a hobbitThen my chances of scoring with a supermodel are good! Excellent... To the batmobile!then your cynicism is to blamehave you seen Christina Aguileras husband?? he looks like a hobbit


Seeing as The Fallen called Megatron his disciple, could it not have been The Fallen that turned Megatron bad and against his comrades? The Fallen is referred to as the first Decepticon, so this is entirely plausible.
Megatron mentions in ROTF he had failed the Fallen by not obtaining the Allspark, which would have powered the machine, The Allspark was not energon, otherwise it would have revived Jetfire completely and utterley, it didnt, it just woke him up.
Sam's Dad mentioned in the movie that the government were paying for re-construction on their house, is it out of the realm of possibility that they payed a lot of other people off as well. They wouldnt have caught everyone, but the people running for their lives at that moment in the first movie probably didnt know WTF was going on.
Starscream says in the movie their Energon is running out, and the Transformers also harvested Suns from lifeless planets in the past, could it maybe have been this what they were living off?
Jazz or Optimus didnt have a spare spark, the Decep's destroyed one of their own and gave his spark to Megatron, then at the end Prime got Jetfire's.
All of this, and other criticisms I hear are all in the frickin movie, its just about paying attention rather than looking for flaws.
Ah, apologies then.I know, I was agreeing and going for sarcasm, but it didn't work out
200 million in five days...over 400 million in six days...yeah, there's going to be a third.
As for the ending of said future film, Bay has referenced all of his films in these two films.
How did he end Armageddon?
And then blared Aerosmith.blew up a big rock and killed Bruce Willis
By the way, you do know how the third film is going to end, right guys?
They aren't in the movie. Even in the first example you had to assume what might have happen. These are flaws that are in your face. When I go see a movie, I want the story to be told to me. I don't want to go home and piece the plot together on a message board.